|           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
September 19, 2020, 05:21:35 pm
News:
If you are having trouble logging in due to invalid user name / pass:

Consider resetting your account password, as you may have forgotten it over time if using a password manager.

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs? (Moderators: Kalwejt, Apocrypha)
  Post random maps here
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 31 32 33 34 35 [36] 37 38 39 40 41 ... 239
Author Topic: Post random maps here  (Read 856044 times)
○∙◄☻tπ[╪AV┼cV└
jfern
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,823


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #875 on: June 09, 2006, 04:49:16 am »
« edited: June 09, 2006, 04:58:39 am by jfern »

Actually, I made a couple mistakes. Nebraska and Florida should both be blue.
Anybody want to guess?
Okay, since nobody wants to guess, I'll just say what it is. Each state is colored according to the political affiliation of the last incumbent Senator to lose reelection. I think Kansas should also be blue, though.
That's a pretty cool idea.
Some of these are pretty long ago, I suppose?

Interesting. Note that losing the primary counts. In NH, Smith was the last Republican incumbent to lose when he lost the 2002 primary. Durkin, a Democrat, was the last to lose a general election, in 1980.

Alaska is weird. Current Presidential candidate Mike Gravel beat an incumbent Democrat in the 1968 primary, and served 2 terms before he himself lost the primary. Alaska has had 2 Republicans since his term ended in 1981. Who would have thought that both incumbent Alaska Senators defeated would be Democrats who lost in the primary?
Logged
Soaring Eagle
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 611


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #876 on: June 09, 2006, 03:25:38 pm »
« Edited: June 09, 2006, 03:29:02 pm by Soaring Eagle »

Actually, I made a couple mistakes. Nebraska and Florida should both be blue.
Anybody want to guess?
Okay, since nobody wants to guess, I'll just say what it is. Each state is colored according to the political affiliation of the last incumbent Senator to lose reelection. I think Kansas should also be blue, though.
That's a pretty cool idea.
Some of these are pretty long ago, I suppose?
Yeah, I had to do a bit of research. Some I was able to get easily (South Dakota) and others I had to look up (Maryland). Louisiana, Mississippi, and Vermont have never had an incumbent be defeated.
Logged
True Democrat
true democrat
Concerned Citizen
*****
Posts: 7,369
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.10, S: -2.87

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #877 on: June 12, 2006, 06:35:03 pm »



Hints: Has to do with the 1992 election. Green indicates a tie.

I think you have Vermont wrong, but is it Perot % + Losing candidates %, or something like that.  That explains the tie in Maryland.  California would be wrong too then, hmm, maybe that's not right actually.
Logged
jokerman
Cosmo Kramer
Concerned Citizen
*****
Posts: 6,969
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #878 on: June 12, 2006, 10:04:12 pm »

Here is a new one related to Presidential elections:


Most EC Votes, yes this has been done before, I believe.
Logged
Soaring Eagle
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 611


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #879 on: June 13, 2006, 11:59:02 am »

Here is a new one related to Presidential elections:


Most EC Votes, yes this has been done before, I believe.
Has it? I was too lazy to check. Tongue
Logged
adam
Captain Vlad
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,938


Political Matrix
E: 2.45, S: -5.04

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #880 on: June 13, 2006, 04:59:59 pm »



Hints: Has to do with the 1992 election. Green indicates a tie.

I think you have Vermont wrong, but is it Perot % + Losing candidates %, or something like that.  That explains the tie in Maryland.  California would be wrong too then, hmm, maybe that's not right actually.

Yeah, I messed up Vermont and California - but you got it right.
Logged
○∙◄☻tπ[╪AV┼cV└
jfern
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,823


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #881 on: June 13, 2006, 11:23:38 pm »
« Edited: June 13, 2006, 11:26:00 pm by jfern »

The only hint I'm giving is that they're fairly unrelated. The first 3 are hard, the last one is easy.










Logged
Jake
dubya2004
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,647
Cuba


Political Matrix
E: -0.90, S: -0.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #882 on: June 13, 2006, 11:58:25 pm »

Here's one, politics related.

Logged
ilikeverin
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,020
Timor-Leste


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #883 on: June 15, 2006, 12:03:06 pm »



Dark and light shades do have something to do with one another.

Oops, I sort of did the map wrong.  It should actually look like this:



With this new completely standardized map, it would be pretty much impossible to have light green or light orange.  Light blue *could* exist, but [hint]probably only for members like Harry and Josh22[/hint].  Oh, and [hint]afleitch too[/hint].

Heck, I could do this map for other places too:

Logged
True Democrat
true democrat
Concerned Citizen
*****
Posts: 7,369
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.10, S: -2.87

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #884 on: June 16, 2006, 01:48:57 pm »

The only hint I'm giving is that they're fairly unrelated. The first 3 are hard, the last one is easy.












The third one is 1916 with the parties reversed and a slight swing to the Republican.  The fourth one is obviously the 2004 election, but where are Alaska and Hawaii?
Logged
Josh/Devilman88
josh4bush
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,083
Political Matrix
E: 3.61, S: -1.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #885 on: June 26, 2006, 10:26:53 pm »



Dark and light shades do have something to do with one another.

Oops, I sort of did the map wrong.  It should actually look like this:



With this new completely standardized map, it would be pretty much impossible to have light green or light orange.  Light blue *could* exist, but [hint]probably only for members like Harry and Josh22[/hint].  Oh, and [hint]afleitch too[/hint].

Heck, I could do this map for other places too:



Wow, that is really hard.
Logged
Josh/Devilman88
josh4bush
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,083
Political Matrix
E: 3.61, S: -1.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #886 on: June 28, 2006, 11:23:28 am »
« Edited: June 28, 2006, 02:38:05 pm by Josh22 »

What would make this happen?

Logged
Shilly
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 564
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #887 on: June 28, 2006, 02:11:01 pm »

This one should be easy.

Logged
True Democrat
true democrat
Concerned Citizen
*****
Posts: 7,369
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.10, S: -2.87

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #888 on: June 28, 2006, 04:19:53 pm »


5 point swing to Carter in 1976.
Logged
Josh/Devilman88
josh4bush
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,083
Political Matrix
E: 3.61, S: -1.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #889 on: June 28, 2006, 08:19:37 pm »

Right!
Logged
○∙◄☻tπ[╪AV┼cV└
jfern
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,823


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #890 on: June 28, 2006, 08:21:50 pm »

The only hint I'm giving is that they're fairly unrelated. The first 3 are hard, the last one is easy.












The third one is 1916 with the parties reversed and a slight swing to the Republican.  The fourth one is obviously the 2004 election, but where are Alaska and Hawaii?

For comparision's sake I took out Alaska and Hawaii. Yes, you got the easy one, and 1/3 of the hard ones. I think I may have screwed up DE on one of the other two, BTW.
Logged
Hatman 🍁
EarlAW
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,959
Canada


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #891 on: June 28, 2006, 08:53:05 pm »



Dark and light shades do have something to do with one another.

Oops, I sort of did the map wrong.  It should actually look like this:



With this new completely standardized map, it would be pretty much impossible to have light green or light orange.  Light blue *could* exist, but [hint]probably only for members like Harry and Josh22[/hint].  Oh, and [hint]afleitch too[/hint].

Heck, I could do this map for other places too:



Wow, that is really hard.

Political map?
Logged
Josh/Devilman88
josh4bush
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,083
Political Matrix
E: 3.61, S: -1.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #892 on: June 28, 2006, 09:48:15 pm »

And What about this one?

Logged
minionofmidas - supplemental forum account
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,232
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #893 on: June 29, 2006, 03:12:23 am »

That's a pretty cool map.
Logged
Soaring Eagle
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 611


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #894 on: June 29, 2006, 06:55:50 pm »



Hint: Howard Dean related.
Logged
Harry Hayfield
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,954
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -2.58, S: 0.35

P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #895 on: June 30, 2006, 12:17:59 pm »


Howard Dean lost Iowa convincingly in the 2004 primary season and Iowa is in grey, so therefore does it show a connection between Dean's primary vote compared to Kerry's?
Logged
Soaring Eagle
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 611


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #896 on: June 30, 2006, 08:30:09 pm »


Howard Dean lost Iowa convincingly in the 2004 primary season and Iowa is in grey, so therefore does it show a connection between Dean's primary vote compared to Kerry's?
No, it has nothing to do with voting percentages. Though you are on to something by saying he lost Iowa.
Logged
○∙◄☻tπ[╪AV┼cV└
jfern
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,823


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #897 on: July 02, 2006, 04:00:02 am »

Logged
ilikeverin
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,020
Timor-Leste


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #898 on: July 04, 2006, 06:26:53 pm »



Dark and light shades do have something to do with one another.

Oops, I sort of did the map wrong.  It should actually look like this:



With this new completely standardized map, it would be pretty much impossible to have light green or light orange.  Light blue *could* exist, but [hint]probably only for members like Harry and Josh22[/hint].  Oh, and [hint]afleitch too[/hint].

Heck, I could do this map for other places too:



Wow, that is really hard.

Political map?

No; earlier, AlcHitlre said something about it having to do with letters, and I said that was somewhat close to what it is.
Logged
MasterJedi
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,605
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #899 on: July 04, 2006, 06:43:18 pm »

Ok, how does this happen in 2008?

Logged
Pages: 1 ... 31 32 33 34 35 [36] 37 38 39 40 41 ... 239  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 7.706 seconds with 13 queries.