Post random maps here (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 05:56:24 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs? (Moderator: Dereich)
  Post random maps here (search mode)
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]
Author Topic: Post random maps here  (Read 985509 times)
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #75 on: July 06, 2007, 03:42:06 PM »

First one is county won by the biggest margin. Second one is narrowest county.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #76 on: July 11, 2007, 01:24:47 PM »

That's not random. That's a map of what Hawaii would look like if it looked like Switzerland.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #77 on: July 13, 2007, 03:47:31 PM »


The 2004 election, where Bush wins the states in which he exceeded his national percentage of the vote, and Kerry gets the rest?
...plus with Ohio and New Mexico reversed just to make it harder? Tongue
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #78 on: October 13, 2007, 02:45:39 PM »

Shouldn't DC be its own colour? It's not as if the standard abbreviation was DOC. Tongue
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #79 on: November 04, 2007, 04:42:54 PM »

It's the first (or maybe second) round of the Atlasian 2005 presidential election.

Red: Lewis
Pink: KEmperor
Orange: Al
memories...
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #80 on: April 04, 2008, 09:59:21 AM »

Gray = Undeclared.  (Seriously, I couldn't find any record of Paterson's faith anywhere.)
Not sure if he's a member, but he got married and even sworn into office (both as Lt.Gov. and as Gov.) here.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #81 on: May 12, 2008, 07:52:53 AM »

Wow, exactly right!  Cheesy

I was very surprised to see that Kansas and Nebraska were not only not the flattest states, but weren't even in the same bracket as the several states that actually were flatter.
They are planes... they're just not parallel to the NN plane...
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #82 on: May 12, 2008, 08:00:16 AM »



No idea if this has been done before, but it should have been. DC and VT should be D>90. AL should be R>100.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #83 on: May 12, 2008, 12:13:35 PM »



No idea if this has been done before, but it should have been. DC and VT should be D>90. AL should be R>100.

Something to do with state politics. Alaska would imply that it has to do with the legislature, though California nullifies that...
Nope. Wrong track entirely. This is about a presidential election.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #84 on: May 12, 2008, 01:18:22 PM »

No.

2004 election.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #85 on: May 13, 2008, 04:08:29 AM »

I'd guess it has something to do with the swing, though South Dakota kind of muddies that.
It does indeed have something to do with the swing. (And I've just rechecked SD, but it's depicted correctly.)

Last hint, because now it should be really easy:
Think about Alabama.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #86 on: May 24, 2008, 02:00:31 PM »

Losers. It's the share of the increase in the major party vote, ie (for blue states):
(Bush2004-Bush2000)/((Bush2004-Bush2000)+(Kerry2004-Gore2000))

In Alabama, Kerry received marginally fewer votes than Gore.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #87 on: June 17, 2008, 09:54:09 AM »



Colours are random and non-political but mean something.

See if you can guess.

There is one error on the map, Correze should be red. I probably gave part away.

Something to do with population growth?

No. It's political.

Huh
The map is political, the colors are not.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #88 on: June 19, 2008, 11:08:37 AM »

Mitterrand?
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #89 on: July 28, 2008, 01:39:05 PM »



The green states have none of something, the red states have only that thing, and the gray states have some of that thing. The map is apolitical.


Isn't NJ's northern border is a straight-line and isn't most of SC's northern border also in straight lines?
And as Hawaii doesn't have any border, shouldn't it be green?

I made a few mistakes, of course.
Four of them, by my count: Hawaii should be green, SC, NJ and NM should be gray. (Yeah, NM has a tiny bit of non-straight line border near El Paso.)
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.031 seconds with 10 queries.