Post random maps here (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 24, 2024, 06:14:29 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs? (Moderator: Dereich)
  Post random maps here (search mode)
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4
Author Topic: Post random maps here  (Read 988736 times)
nini2287
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,616


Political Matrix
E: 2.77, S: -3.39
« Reply #50 on: September 10, 2005, 07:54:31 PM »

Who won a majority of each state's counties?
Logged
nini2287
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,616


Political Matrix
E: 2.77, S: -3.39
« Reply #51 on: September 10, 2005, 08:02:14 PM »

Actually no, looking at the data, NH should be red.  Maybe who won the smallest county (in population) of each state?
Logged
nini2287
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,616


Political Matrix
E: 2.77, S: -3.39
« Reply #52 on: September 14, 2005, 03:44:01 PM »
Logged
nini2287
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,616


Political Matrix
E: 2.77, S: -3.39
« Reply #53 on: September 15, 2005, 12:48:52 PM »
« Edited: September 15, 2005, 12:58:24 PM by nini2287 »
Quote from: pellaken on September 14, 2005, 05:33:42 PM
something to do with the states, or congress. Not senators, not represetnives, not state governors, not state senators, not state houses...
It is government related although blue and red are arbitrary.
Logged
nini2287
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,616


Political Matrix
E: 2.77, S: -3.39
« Reply #54 on: September 15, 2005, 12:57:26 PM »


Political, but red and blue are interchangeable.  Also in the news lately.
Logged
nini2287
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,616


Political Matrix
E: 2.77, S: -3.39
« Reply #55 on: September 15, 2005, 01:06:17 PM »
Quote from: pellaken on September 15, 2005, 01:04:08 PM
Quote from: pellaken on September 15, 2005, 01:00:02 PM
Quote from: nini2287 on September 15, 2005, 12:48:52 PM
Quote from: pellaken on September 14, 2005, 05:33:42 PM
something to do with the states, or congress. Not senators, not represetnives, not state governors, not state senators, not state houses...
It is government related although blue and red are arbitrary.

my thinking is something to do with governors, but what, I have no clue.

women in the senate come CLOSE...

Combine the two ideas.
Logged
nini2287
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,616


Political Matrix
E: 2.77, S: -3.39
« Reply #56 on: September 15, 2005, 01:11:51 PM »
Quote from: pellaken on September 15, 2005, 01:08:39 PM
Quote from: nini2287 on September 15, 2005, 01:06:17 PM
Quote from: pellaken on September 15, 2005, 01:04:08 PM
Quote from: pellaken on September 15, 2005, 01:00:02 PM
Quote from: nini2287 on September 15, 2005, 12:48:52 PM
Quote from: pellaken on September 14, 2005, 05:33:42 PM
something to do with the states, or congress. Not senators, not represetnives, not state governors, not state senators, not state houses...
It is government related although blue and red are arbitrary.

my thinking is something to do with governors, but what, I have no clue.

women in the senate come CLOSE...

Combine the two ideas.

alright then Tongue places with women in statwide office

am I right with my other guess above?

Yeah that's correct (I didn't bother to look up row offices or count Wyoming [their one statewide US Rep is a woman])

Sorry I missed your guess but that is correct (members of the Judiciary Comittee)
Logged
nini2287
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,616


Political Matrix
E: 2.77, S: -3.39
« Reply #57 on: September 16, 2005, 04:00:30 PM »
Quote from: Bacon King on September 16, 2005, 06:19:56 AM
I'll give a hint for mine. Colors are arbitrary. Red means they have/had something that the other states don't. Grey means they came close to becoming red.

celebrity governors?
Logged
nini2287
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,616


Political Matrix
E: 2.77, S: -3.39
« Reply #58 on: September 16, 2005, 05:41:22 PM »
Quote from: Judge Max Power on September 16, 2005, 05:13:18 PM
Quote from: Bacon King on September 16, 2005, 05:08:22 PM
Very close. To be more specific, what movie were all three of the celebrities in together?
Predator!! Minnesota and California elected one, and Kentucky almost did!!! Grin

Pardon my ignorance, who ran from Kentucky?
Logged
nini2287
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,616


Political Matrix
E: 2.77, S: -3.39
« Reply #59 on: September 17, 2005, 04:06:07 PM »
Quote from: Bacon King on September 17, 2005, 03:21:10 PM
Quote from: Boss Tweed on September 17, 2005, 02:25:53 PM

The red states are not 50% of any race (no race has a majority); the gray state is majority-minority.

Huh
Can't be it, IIRC Arizona- and probably another state- would be red too.

Yeah Texas would be.
Logged
nini2287
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,616


Political Matrix
E: 2.77, S: -3.39
« Reply #60 on: September 19, 2005, 07:37:41 PM »

The highest % the Democrats have ever gotten in each state?
Logged
nini2287
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,616


Political Matrix
E: 2.77, S: -3.39
« Reply #61 on: September 21, 2005, 03:34:32 PM »
Quote from: pellaken on September 21, 2005, 01:30:43 AM


hehehe, no one will ever get this one. The three colours are interchangable (AKA blue does not mean republican, etc)

clue: KY and NJ are "sometimes" red

ack I didn't see Earl's post and posted the same thing lol
Logged
nini2287
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,616


Political Matrix
E: 2.77, S: -3.39
« Reply #62 on: October 10, 2005, 11:04:43 AM »

I think it's 2004, not 2000.
Logged
nini2287
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,616


Political Matrix
E: 2.77, S: -3.39
« Reply #63 on: October 13, 2005, 12:27:06 PM »


Based on 2004 Election Results.  I had to extrapolate some states where there wasn't enough data, and for WY-there was no data.
Logged
nini2287
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,616


Political Matrix
E: 2.77, S: -3.39
« Reply #64 on: October 14, 2005, 12:17:36 PM »

The more red, the longer the state's name and vice versa.
Logged
nini2287
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,616


Political Matrix
E: 2.77, S: -3.39
« Reply #65 on: October 14, 2005, 01:12:42 PM »

Well I thought it was a political map at first seeing Utah and Idaho that dark blue.
Logged
nini2287
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,616


Political Matrix
E: 2.77, S: -3.39
« Reply #66 on: October 14, 2005, 05:16:56 PM »
Quote from: Alcon on October 14, 2005, 05:10:31 PM
Quote from: nini2287 on October 13, 2005, 12:27:06 PM


Based on 2004 Election Results.  I had to extrapolate some states where there wasn't enough data, and for WY-there was no data.

CNN exit poll listing for "Suburban"?

Yup, BRTD would not be happy.
Logged
nini2287
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,616


Political Matrix
E: 2.77, S: -3.39
« Reply #67 on: October 14, 2005, 07:33:03 PM »
Quote from: Alcon on October 14, 2005, 05:30:32 PM
May have already been done, but here is a fairly easy one that I changed to be harder:



The governor map after the 2002 but before the 2003 election, with the % of the vote the winner got in the preceding election.
Logged
nini2287
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,616


Political Matrix
E: 2.77, S: -3.39
« Reply #68 on: October 16, 2005, 12:13:58 PM »

The 1896 election with a few new states added?
Logged
nini2287
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,616


Political Matrix
E: 2.77, S: -3.39
« Reply #69 on: October 17, 2005, 12:15:43 PM »
Quote from: Joe Republic on October 17, 2005, 11:53:38 AM
Probably a few mistakes with this one.

PLEASE NOTE THAT THE NUMBER IN MAINE SHOULD BE 2, AND NEBRASKA SHOULD BE 0.



The number of female representatives and senators in each state
Logged
nini2287
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,616


Political Matrix
E: 2.77, S: -3.39
« Reply #70 on: October 24, 2005, 01:13:30 PM »


Non-political
Logged
nini2287
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,616


Political Matrix
E: 2.77, S: -3.39
« Reply #71 on: October 27, 2005, 12:46:33 PM »
Quote from: Joe Republic on October 27, 2005, 11:47:29 AM
These maps are related.  Should be fairly easy.







Map 1-How each state's most populated county voted in 2004.

Map 2-How each state's least populated county voted in 2004.
Logged
nini2287
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,616


Political Matrix
E: 2.77, S: -3.39
« Reply #72 on: November 21, 2005, 06:17:40 PM »
Quote from: Joe Republic on November 21, 2005, 03:15:34 PM
Quote from: ilikeverin on November 20, 2005, 01:11:03 PM
Quote from: Joe Republic on November 19, 2005, 07:10:43 PM



The SD, MS and AL results should hopefully be a sufficient clue.

McGovern v. Goldwater or something?

You're very close, but missing another detail.

Is it a combination of the 1964 and 1972 maps?
Logged
nini2287
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,616


Political Matrix
E: 2.77, S: -3.39
« Reply #73 on: November 25, 2005, 09:22:25 PM »


Political, but red and blue don't mean Republican or Democrat.
Logged
nini2287
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,616


Political Matrix
E: 2.77, S: -3.39
« Reply #74 on: November 26, 2005, 04:58:09 PM »
Quote from: SoS True Independent on November 26, 2005, 10:40:56 AM
Quote from: Harry Hayfield on November 26, 2005, 04:58:05 AM
Quote from: nini2287 on November 25, 2005, 09:22:25 PM


Political, but red and blue don't mean Republican or Democrat.

Red states: Turnout over 60% in Election 2004
Blue States: Turnout between 50 and 60% in Election 2004
Grey States: Turnout less than 50% in Election 2004

That can't be it, since turnout was over 60% for the whole nation.

Nope.  Here's a hint.  I'll give you the map from 5 years ago:
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.08 seconds with 12 queries.