Post random maps here (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 20, 2024, 11:27:03 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs? (Moderator: Dereich)
  Post random maps here (search mode)
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4
Author Topic: Post random maps here  (Read 986753 times)
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #25 on: June 23, 2005, 03:36:46 AM »
Quote from: Machiavelli on June 22, 2005, 03:59:38 PM
Quote from: Senator Colin Wixted on June 22, 2005, 03:22:41 PM

Let me take a shot at it. 1912 if all of Teddy Roosevelt's votes went for Wilson?

Doesn't explain Michigan.

Maybe TR is taken off the ballot altogether... or something.
Almost got it. It's the percentage of the major-party (ie, Dem or Rep) vote. Michigan is the only state where Wilson came third, btw.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #26 on: June 23, 2005, 03:37:44 AM »
Quote from: Lewis Trondheim on June 22, 2005, 04:34:51 AM

What's this?
Non-political btw. Demographic.
Anyone to try this?
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #27 on: June 23, 2005, 06:40:54 AM »
Plus Lieberman as candidate would lose vast sh**tloads of northeastern and western votes.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #28 on: June 24, 2005, 02:51:32 PM »
Quote from: Lewis Trondheim on June 22, 2005, 04:34:51 AM

What's this?
Non-political btw. Demographic.
hint
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #29 on: June 24, 2005, 03:56:57 PM »
Hmph. Nobody tries to guess. I'll have to punish you guys with a new map.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #30 on: June 26, 2005, 09:35:48 AM »
Red - Mexicans are largest immigrant group (by place of birth).
Blue - They're not.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #31 on: June 28, 2005, 03:51:03 AM »


Maps are related to each other.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #32 on: June 28, 2005, 04:07:02 AM »
Political. 2004 election.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #33 on: June 28, 2005, 06:16:34 AM »
Quote from: LiberalPA on June 28, 2005, 06:09:07 AM
is it results according to 2 certain age brackets?
No. The grey in Alaska and DC might give you a clue btw. Smiley
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #34 on: June 29, 2005, 06:46:49 AM »
It's the most and least non-hispanic White county in every state. Note that there' a no. of states (such as Iowa) where the least White county is still lily-white.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #35 on: June 30, 2005, 04:42:32 AM »
Something about Senator's ratings?
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #36 on: July 01, 2005, 04:09:13 AM »
Quote from: Bono on June 30, 2005, 03:48:53 PM
Quote from: Lewis Trondheim on June 22, 2005, 04:34:51 AM

What's this?
Non-political btw. Demographic.

Growing states vs aging states?
I'd already solved this one. I might do one intra-US migration patterns...
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #37 on: July 05, 2005, 11:57:32 AM »
Quote from: Lewis Trondheim on July 01, 2005, 04:09:13 AM
Quote from: Bono on June 30, 2005, 03:48:53 PM
Quote from: Lewis Trondheim on June 22, 2005, 04:34:51 AM
What's this?
Non-political btw. Demographic.

Growing states vs aging states?
I'd already solved this one. I might do one intra-US migration patterns...
Here goes. Specially for you.
Red=positive lifetime internal migration balance (ie, more people living here born in other states of the union or DC than people born here but living in other states of the union or DC)
Blue=negative lifetime internal migration balance
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #38 on: August 27, 2005, 10:21:12 AM »
Quote from: skybridge on August 16, 2005, 02:10:19 PM

Alright, since you've all been impatiently patiently enthusiastic about the results, I shall reveal them.

Blue - Harding lost zero to one county.
Red - Harding lost more than one county.

Alaska and Hawaii were left for confusion.
That's a pretty cool map.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #39 on: October 11, 2005, 06:57:52 AM »
Something to do with Atlas Fantasy Politics?
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #40 on: November 23, 2005, 09:02:43 AM »
« Edited: November 23, 2005, 11:16:35 AM by Didi & Stulle »
EDIT: Ah, whatever, I'll solve em right away.


Blue - more people originally from this state now residing in Florida than in California. Red - more in California. Green - more in California than in Florida, but more native Californians in this state than natives of this state in California.
I like that fairly clean East-West cut, although bleeding Kentuckians complicate the matter...


Blue - net lifetime immigration state (from other US states, DC and P.R. only; without immigration from foreign countries.)
Red - net lifetime emigration state (ditto)
Colour shades are what they always are, ie 60% means immigrants to this state are 60-70% of (immigrants to + emigrants from) this state. (In other words, immigrants outnumber emigrants by over 3 to 2, and by not much more than 2 to 1.) etc.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #41 on: November 24, 2005, 10:53:32 AM »
Quote from: Joe Republic on November 23, 2005, 07:49:52 PM
How the heck was anybody supposed to get either of those? Tongue
The second one is fairly easy, Joe. What else can you think of distributed in such a fashion except growth?

The first is pretty impossible, grant you that. It's just something I stumbled upon and found interesting.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #42 on: December 01, 2005, 09:05:56 AM »
« Edited: December 06, 2005, 06:31:15 PM by Dave Leip »
Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #43 on: December 01, 2005, 09:20:30 AM »


Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #44 on: December 06, 2005, 08:16:46 AM »
Quote from: Ted Stevens on December 05, 2005, 07:51:52 PM


Color has nothing to do with it.

//Edit\

The percentage does have something to do with it, but the party choice does not.
Yeah, I'd figured that without the Edit....let's push this topic to the next page.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #45 on: January 04, 2006, 06:20:35 AM »
No, actually this is a ten-point swing to FDR:
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #46 on: January 09, 2006, 10:01:13 AM »
With the added complication that y is treated as a consonant even where no sane person would dream of doing such a thing (Kentucky).
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #47 on: January 09, 2006, 11:39:44 AM »

May have been done before.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #48 on: January 09, 2006, 12:39:05 PM »
« Edited: January 10, 2006, 09:07:29 AM by César Chávez »

I don't think this one's been done.

EDIT - noticed and corrected error in Oregon. And colour of DC is a matter of definition, it could just easily be the other shade.
Both are silly/unpolitical, by the way.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #49 on: January 12, 2006, 09:58:16 AM »
Nobody willing or able?
Alright, I'll solve:
Blue states would be further to the front of the alphabet if spelled backwards.Blue states' names exist as county names. (District of Columbia treated as "Columbia".)
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.058 seconds with 12 queries.