Post random maps here (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 29, 2024, 03:12:30 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs? (Moderator: Dereich)
  Post random maps here (search mode)
Pages: 1 [2] 3
Author Topic: Post random maps here  (Read 980166 times)
SPC
Chuck Hagel 08
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,004
Latvia


« Reply #25 on: February 21, 2013, 07:42:48 PM »

2012 election if the South votes similarly to the rest of the nation and national popular vote is even:

Logged
SPC
Chuck Hagel 08
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,004
Latvia


« Reply #26 on: July 06, 2013, 04:49:26 PM »

House vote on NAFTA by state:
Logged
SPC
Chuck Hagel 08
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,004
Latvia


« Reply #27 on: July 06, 2013, 04:56:44 PM »

House vote on NDAA authorization:
Logged
SPC
Chuck Hagel 08
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,004
Latvia


« Reply #28 on: July 07, 2013, 12:21:32 AM »

TARP:
Logged
SPC
Chuck Hagel 08
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,004
Latvia


« Reply #29 on: August 10, 2013, 10:20:50 PM »

McCain vs Romney, in terms of raw votes:
Logged
SPC
Chuck Hagel 08
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,004
Latvia


« Reply #30 on: January 19, 2014, 11:40:12 PM »



Romney 2012 vs Bush 2000, in terms of vote percentage.
Logged
SPC
Chuck Hagel 08
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,004
Latvia


« Reply #31 on: January 20, 2014, 01:04:48 AM »



Romney 2012 vs Bush 2000, in terms of vote percentage.

I don't get what the color shades represent.

Each shade is a 2% increment. For instance. D>30% means Bush did <2% better than Romney, D>40% means Bush did 2-4% better than Romney, etc.
Logged
SPC
Chuck Hagel 08
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,004
Latvia


« Reply #32 on: January 26, 2014, 11:35:41 PM »



Barack Obama 24.9% 165 EV
Hillary Clinton 24.7% 181 EV
John McCain 20.9% 147 EV
Mike Huckabee 9.7% 35 EV
Mitt Romney 9.5% 8 EV
Logged
SPC
Chuck Hagel 08
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,004
Latvia


« Reply #33 on: April 02, 2014, 12:52:14 AM »



Clinton 1996 % vs Gore 2000 %
Logged
SPC
Chuck Hagel 08
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,004
Latvia


« Reply #34 on: April 03, 2014, 12:27:31 AM »



Eisenhower 1952 vote total vs Nixon 1960 vote total
Logged
SPC
Chuck Hagel 08
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,004
Latvia


« Reply #35 on: April 19, 2014, 10:07:49 PM »



Dewey 1944 vote total vs Dewey 1948 vote total
Logged
SPC
Chuck Hagel 08
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,004
Latvia


« Reply #36 on: April 25, 2014, 09:36:40 PM »



Vice President Richard Nixon (R-CA)/Ambassador Henry Lodge Jr. (R-MA) - 50.05%, 270 EV's
Senator John Kennedy (D-MA)/Majority Leader Lyndon Johnson (D-TX) - 49.22%, 259 EV's



President Richard Nixon (R-CA)/Vice President Henry Lodge Jr (R-MA) - 61.8%, 507 EV's
Senator Wayne Morse (D-OR)/Senator Eugene McCarthy (D-MN) - 36.8%, 31 EV's



Senator John F. Kennedy (D-MA)/Senator Hubert Humphrey (D-MN) - 46.8%, 330 EV's
Governor Nelson Rockefeller (R-NY)/Governor Spiro Agnew (R-MD) - 44.2%, 191 EV's
Governor George Wallace (I-AL)/Colonel Sanders (I-KY) - 8.5%, 17 EV's



Does Nixon veto the CRA in this timeline?
Logged
SPC
Chuck Hagel 08
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,004
Latvia


« Reply #37 on: May 17, 2014, 06:13:46 PM »

1996: Upset over Perot's perceived effect on the 1992 election, Republican state legislators across the nation inplement instant-runoff voting:



Bill Clinton 371
Bob Dole 167

2000: Republican legislators quickly regret their push for instant-runoff voting:



Al Gore 296
George W. Bush 242
Logged
SPC
Chuck Hagel 08
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,004
Latvia


« Reply #38 on: May 22, 2014, 05:05:57 PM »



Dukakis/Bentsen 280 50.4%
Bush/Quayle 258 48.6%



Powell/Cheney 283 40.3%
Dukakis/Bentsen 245 38.8%
Perot/Stockdale 10 20.5%
Logged
SPC
Chuck Hagel 08
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,004
Latvia


« Reply #39 on: June 16, 2014, 11:43:11 AM »

One Party Rule

1968:


Nixon/Agnew 43.4% 301
Humphrey/Muskie 42.7% 191
Wallace/LeMay 13.5% 46

1972:


Nixon/Agnew 60.7% 521
McGovern/Shriver 37.5% 17

1976:


Ford/Bush 50.1% 394
Carter/Mondale 47.9% 144

Ford and Bush's avoidance of major gaffes during the Presidential debates allows the ticket to continue to gain momentum for an upset victory.

1980:


Reagan/Bush 49.6% 283
Kennedy/Glenn 48.8% 255

Kennedy appeared to be a shoo-in with stagflation under the Ford administration and a divided Republican Party after Governor Reagan's primary victory over Vice-President Bush. However, an October Surprise in the form of the Iranian government releasing the American hostages gave Reagan the boost needed to win the election.

1984:


Reagan/Bush 54.8% 421
Hart/Dukakis 44.6% 117

A recovering economy, Reagan's personal charisma, and Hart's marital indiscretions enable a comfortable re-election for the President.

1988:


Bush/Quayle 53.4% 426
Dukakis/Bentsen 45.7% 112

1992:


Bush/Quayle 38.0% 275
Clinton/Gore 38.6% 259
Perot/Silber 22.7% 4

Divided opposition enables the incumbent to narrowly prevail despite a recession, largely thanks to Senator Gore's inability to deliver his home state for the Democratic ticket. Democrats are frustrated by the loss in the Electoral College despite obtaining more popular votes.

1996:


Dole/Kemp 48.8% 274
Cuomo/Gephart 48.8% 264

President Bush's immense popularity is just barely enough to drag Senator Dole across the finish line, after an easy primary victory over Vice-President Quayle. Democrats blame Ralph Nader for siphoning votes from Cuomo.
Logged
SPC
Chuck Hagel 08
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,004
Latvia


« Reply #40 on: July 10, 2014, 11:12:47 PM »

^I've always thought there was a pretty good chance that in the event of a tie, the Democratic Senate would put up their Presidential nominee for VP.

That sure as hell would be interesting to have a sitting VP challenge the President

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election,_1800
Logged
SPC
Chuck Hagel 08
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,004
Latvia


« Reply #41 on: July 14, 2014, 10:33:27 PM »

A Random Walk Down Pennsylvania Avenue....


Clinton 370
Bush 168


Clinton 338
Dole 200


Bush 357
Gore 181


Bush 374
Kerry 164


Obama 277
McCain 261


Romney 328
Obama 210
Logged
SPC
Chuck Hagel 08
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,004
Latvia


« Reply #42 on: July 19, 2014, 10:13:36 PM »



Obama/Biden 538
Palin/Ayotte 0
Logged
SPC
Chuck Hagel 08
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,004
Latvia


« Reply #43 on: July 19, 2014, 10:34:22 PM »



Nixon 1960 49.9% 301
Eisenhower 1952 50.1% 230
Logged
SPC
Chuck Hagel 08
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,004
Latvia


« Reply #44 on: November 05, 2014, 08:05:47 PM »

If the polling biases of 2012 and 2014 switched:

Romney 321-Obama 217


GOP 52
Dems+Ind 48


GOP 56
Dems+Ind 42
Runoffs 2
Logged
SPC
Chuck Hagel 08
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,004
Latvia


« Reply #45 on: November 23, 2014, 09:39:02 AM »



Clinton 323 37.4%
Perot 161 32.9%
Bush 54 29.0%
Logged
SPC
Chuck Hagel 08
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,004
Latvia


« Reply #46 on: December 01, 2014, 07:20:58 PM »

Why would Hillary Clinton join the party that ousted her husband? (Okay, I suppose my question presupposes a degree of loyalty in a couple that is power-hungry, but you get the idea)
Logged
SPC
Chuck Hagel 08
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,004
Latvia


« Reply #47 on: December 02, 2014, 03:38:11 PM »



Portman/Baker 60% 495
Clinton/Mabus 34% 43
Sanders/Snowden 3%
Logged
SPC
Chuck Hagel 08
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,004
Latvia


« Reply #48 on: December 06, 2014, 02:36:28 PM »

Romney's the One!



Romney/Hogan 43.4% 274
Clinton/Klobuchar 42.7% 232
Cruz/LePage 13.5% 32
Logged
SPC
Chuck Hagel 08
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,004
Latvia


« Reply #49 on: December 12, 2014, 02:19:45 AM »



Reagan 1980 vs Romney 2012

(>30% corresponds to less than 3.6%, which is the difference between Reagan's percentage and Romney's percentage. All other shades are increments of 5%)
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.226 seconds with 10 queries.