Post random maps here

[Antonio the Sixth]

Here's an easy one :

[Antonio the Sixth]

White : States Nixon never carried
Green : States he carried in 1972 only
Red : States he carried in 1968 and 1972
Yellow : States he carried in 1960 and 1972
Blue : States he carried each time


What about mine ?

[Antonio the Sixth]

Here's an easy very easy one :

Democrat : 33.12%, 202 EVs
Republican : 33.12%, 195 EVs
Independent : 33.12%, 141 EVs

[Antonio the Sixth]

On the same subject :

Independent : 37.41%, 320 EVs
Democrat : 35.51%, 181 EVs
Republican : 26.45%, 37 EVs

[Antonio the Sixth]

Congratulations, you got it.
To be fair, you were the only one who really tried...

Note that for the second map I chose to take to Bush -0ù of the votes I gave to Perot, and 40% to Clinton, which I thonk is the most realistic possibility if Perot had performed so well. As a result, it makes Clinton's margin over Bush higher by 3.5 points, which gives him a 9 points edge results in flipping to Clinton North Carolina.

[Antonio the Sixth]

So it's Clinton 37%, Bush 31% and Perot 31% ? Interesting to see how almost every Perot State comes from the bush side.

[Antonio the Sixth]

Interesting to see how almost every Perot State comes from the bush side.

5 were clinton states 6 were bush.

Oh, well... at a first sight it looked like there were almost only Bush States... however, most of te Clinton state going for Perot are less democratic than the national margin.

[Antonio the Sixth]

A map similar to my previous ones. It should be very easy :

Independent : 30.8%, 180 EVs
Democratic : 30.8%, 176 EVs
Republican : 30.8%, 175 EVs

[Antonio the Sixth]

A map similar to my previous ones. It should be very easy :

Independent : 30.8%, 180 EVs
Democratic : 30.8%, 176 EVs
Republican : 30.8%, 175 EVs

1912?

Right year. Can you tell more about it ?

[Antonio the Sixth]

...and how it would result on the Electoral College. You got it.

[Antonio the Sixth]

Sorry, already done.

Here's an easy very easy one :

Democrat : 33.12%, 202 EVs
Republican : 33.12%, 195 EVs
Independent : 33.12%, 141 EVs

[Antonio the Sixth]

From 1876 to 1888 :
- Blue : States that always voted for Republicans
- Light blue : States that voted for Republicans most of the time
- Light red : States that voted for Democrats most of the time
- Red : States that always voted for Democrats

[Antonio the Sixth]

1932 in case of a Roosevelt/Hoover tie. I know because I've alreasy made the map on my computer.

[Antonio the Sixth]

An attempt to create more geographically coherent Senate classes while at the same time equally dividing each of the four big regions.

[Antonio the Sixth]

Red : voted dem in 1976, 1980 and 1984
Yellow : voted dem in 1976 and 1980, rep in 1984
Green : voted dem in 1976, rep in 1980 and 1984
Blue : voted rep in 1976, 1980 and 1984
White : // // // but swang dem from 1980 to 1984

[Antonio the Sixth]

Now it's my turn !

This one is hard, but if you remember of anothere map I posted several months ago, it might help you. ask me for further hints.

[Antonio the Sixth]

So nobody for mine. Anyways, a Teddy Roosevelt victory in 1912 :

Roosevelt : 42.4%, 330 EVs
Wilson : 36.84%, 201 EVs
Taft : 15.17%, 0 EVs

[Antonio the Sixth]

This one should be very easy:

1916/2000 comparison :

Blue : Wilson/Bush
Light blue : Hughes/Bush
Light red : Wilson/Gore
Red : Hughes/Gore

Also, New Hampshire is the wrong color : it should be dark blue.

[Antonio the Sixth]

Some maps regarding Atlas data :


Year of the earliest State's County map available (numbers from 72 to 96 represent 1800 years, those from 00 to 60 represent 1900 ones) :

States for which CD data are available (yellow States have only one CD) :

Which means we have 272 districts of 435.

[Antonio the Sixth]

1916/2000 comparison :

Blue : Wilson/Bush
Light blue : Hughes/Bush
Light red : Wilson/Gore
Red : Hughes/Gore

Also, New Hampshire is the wrong color : it should be dark blue.

Extremely close, and New Hampshire is the right color.

Ok, I got it.
It's a comparison between 1916, 2000 and 2004, with dark red meaning voting for Hughes, Gore and Kerry and dark blue being Wilson and Bush. Light shades are combinations of those.

[Antonio the Sixth]

Now it's my turn !

This one is hard, but if you remember of anothere map I posted several months ago, it might help you. ask me for further hints.

[Antonio the Sixth]

1908/2008 elections

Red : Bryan/Obama
Yellow : Bryan/McCain
Green : Taft/Obama
Blue : Taft/McCain
Grey : -/Obama
White : -/McCain

[Antonio the Sixth]

Now it's my turn !

This one is hard, but if you remember of anothere map I posted several months ago, it might help you. ask me for further hints.

[Antonio the Sixth]

Now it's my turn !

This one is hard, but if you remember of anothere map I posted several months ago, it might help you. ask me for further hints.

Is this another comparison one?

No, colors don't relfect political parties.

It's about the 2000 census and the 2003 redistricting, just to give you a hint.

[Antonio the Sixth]

Couldn't have said it better. Congratulations.

That means if the House had 425 seats, blue States would have one seat less, and if it had 445 red States would have one more. To be more precise, California would have 2 less or 1 more and Texas one less or one more.