Post random maps here (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 06:03:49 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs? (Moderator: Dereich)
  Post random maps here (search mode)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8
Author Topic: Post random maps here  (Read 991747 times)
RIP Robert H Bork
officepark
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,030
Czech Republic


« Reply #125 on: December 29, 2009, 08:21:06 PM »

Logged
RIP Robert H Bork
officepark
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,030
Czech Republic


« Reply #126 on: December 31, 2009, 07:19:10 PM »

2004 election, only Bush dumps Cheney as his vp and instead chooses Christine Todd Whitman who swings New Jersey to the Republican column, but is unable to create enough Republican votes in the Northeast to hold New Hampshire or gain other states. She campaigns heavily in Hawaii however, and brings it into the Republican column, because she doesn't have the baggage Cheney has.

Linda Lingle as the vice president nominee?
Possibly could attract more moderate support, helping Bush win New Jersey. The campaign just didn't focus as much in New Hampshire, so they lost it.



Both incorrect.

2008 election with the same swing as 2004.
Logged
RIP Robert H Bork
officepark
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,030
Czech Republic


« Reply #127 on: January 23, 2010, 08:27:57 PM »



Hint: numbers do not refer to electoral votes
Logged
RIP Robert H Bork
officepark
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,030
Czech Republic


« Reply #128 on: January 29, 2010, 08:26:22 PM »


No one guessed this, so: Cities with population 100,000 or greater
Logged
RIP Robert H Bork
officepark
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,030
Czech Republic


« Reply #129 on: February 09, 2010, 07:04:50 PM »


The Republicans choose to endorse an independent candidate instead of running their own?

It's the 1992 election with George Bush take off the ticket and Perrot tied with Bill Clinton with the popular vote.

I thought so, especially with how VA, NC and SC stand out.
Logged
RIP Robert H Bork
officepark
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,030
Czech Republic


« Reply #130 on: February 24, 2010, 10:22:54 PM »

Hm, something to do with the Senate?
Logged
RIP Robert H Bork
officepark
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,030
Czech Republic


« Reply #131 on: March 02, 2010, 08:03:42 PM »





Logged
RIP Robert H Bork
officepark
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,030
Czech Republic


« Reply #132 on: March 12, 2010, 10:16:22 PM »


Yes...why did it take so long for the forum to figure this out?
Logged
RIP Robert H Bork
officepark
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,030
Czech Republic


« Reply #133 on: March 12, 2010, 11:00:45 PM »

Hey, I got it right away! Tongue This is just the first time I looked at it.

But it's been there 10 days already.
Logged
RIP Robert H Bork
officepark
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,030
Czech Republic


« Reply #134 on: March 14, 2010, 03:40:04 PM »

Yes...I noticed that Massachusetts and Pennsylvania are shaded differently even though they both have 4 syllables. (I pronounce the last three letters of the latter as one syllable.)
Logged
RIP Robert H Bork
officepark
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,030
Czech Republic


« Reply #135 on: March 14, 2010, 10:59:26 PM »


0=gray
1=red
2=blue
3=green
4=yellow
5=orange
Logged
RIP Robert H Bork
officepark
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,030
Czech Republic


« Reply #136 on: March 18, 2010, 11:03:38 AM »


Something to do with swing/trend in 2008? Because of how CT and VT stand out....
Logged
RIP Robert H Bork
officepark
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,030
Czech Republic


« Reply #137 on: March 23, 2010, 05:57:33 PM »


States where all counties voted for Nixon in 1972?
Logged
RIP Robert H Bork
officepark
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,030
Czech Republic


« Reply #138 on: March 23, 2010, 09:13:01 PM »


There's one mistake though.
Logged
RIP Robert H Bork
officepark
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,030
Czech Republic


« Reply #139 on: March 23, 2010, 09:22:34 PM »


South Carolina and Alaska (so yes, two mistakes).
Logged
RIP Robert H Bork
officepark
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,030
Czech Republic


« Reply #140 on: March 23, 2010, 09:30:39 PM »


Yes, true. Tongue

And you also got South Carolina wrong.
Logged
RIP Robert H Bork
officepark
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,030
Czech Republic


« Reply #141 on: March 24, 2010, 03:16:57 PM »

Logged
RIP Robert H Bork
officepark
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,030
Czech Republic


« Reply #142 on: March 24, 2010, 03:35:30 PM »

Blank and red states voted for Smith in 1928, that's all I come up with.

That's part of it. There's something else, though.
Logged
RIP Robert H Bork
officepark
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,030
Czech Republic


« Reply #143 on: March 25, 2010, 10:09:05 PM »


Green=Voted for Hoover in 1928 and Johnson in 1964
Red=Voted Smith and Johnson
Blue=Voted Hoover and Goldwater
White=Voted Smith and Johnson
Yellow=Didn't vote in 1928

YES! We have a winner!

It should have been obvious by the way, thanks to how the gray states (Deep South) stood out in both elections.
Logged
RIP Robert H Bork
officepark
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,030
Czech Republic


« Reply #144 on: April 09, 2010, 05:03:26 PM »


Your prediction for post-election governorships?
Logged
RIP Robert H Bork
officepark
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,030
Czech Republic


« Reply #145 on: June 16, 2010, 10:06:37 PM »


Something to do with 1972 and adjacent presidential elections.
Logged
RIP Robert H Bork
officepark
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,030
Czech Republic


« Reply #146 on: June 29, 2010, 06:44:34 PM »

I tried this before, to no avail. So now, here's an all-new attempt (using 2009 data, so there's a hint right there).

Map 1:



Map 2:



Notes:

Both maps are non-political. Also, in both maps, shades are not related to each other (so for example, in map 2, Massachusetts is not a "weaker" Wyoming or anything). Finally, though the maps themselves are related, the shades are not (so Texas in map 2 does not mean the same as Iowa or Louisiana in map 1, even though they are all the same color).
Logged
RIP Robert H Bork
officepark
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,030
Czech Republic


« Reply #147 on: June 30, 2010, 10:46:49 PM »

I tried this before, to no avail. So now, here's an all-new attempt (using 2009 data, so there's a hint right there).

Map 1:



Map 2:



Notes:

Both maps are non-political. Also, in both maps, shades are not related to each other (so for example, in map 2, Massachusetts is not a "weaker" Wyoming or anything). Finally, though the maps themselves are related, the shades are not (so Texas in map 2 does not mean the same as Iowa or Louisiana in map 1, even though they are all the same color).

Anyone?
Logged
RIP Robert H Bork
officepark
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,030
Czech Republic


« Reply #148 on: August 27, 2010, 06:28:00 PM »

Logged
RIP Robert H Bork
officepark
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,030
Czech Republic


« Reply #149 on: August 27, 2010, 06:59:22 PM »

Something to do with the 2008 election?

Yes.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.073 seconds with 11 queries.