Post random maps here (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 18, 2024, 09:44:30 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs? (Moderator: Dereich)
  Post random maps here (search mode)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5]
Author Topic: Post random maps here  (Read 984905 times)
Smid
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,151
Australia


« Reply #100 on: May 06, 2010, 01:04:14 AM »


One last bump, if anyone wants to take a guess.

They all went for Bush in 2004, so I guess something to do with that. Iowa and New Mexico didn't go for Bush in 2000, and they're shaded a lighter colour...
West Virginia...?

You're on the right track. Smiley

I'd been going to suggest that it was sort of the Republican "winning streak" - how many elections in a row it had been won by the Republican candidate - ie. in 2004 IA and NM were just once, WV was twice... except it can't be that because there were other states that should have been just twice, and others that should have been shaded darker.
Basically... no Republican since 04 has won the general without Iowa/New Mexico.

No Republican since 2000 has won the general without WV.

etc.

As for the darkest states, no Republican since 1952 (and beyond in some cases) has won without them.

Good map!


Well, MS/AL stick out for some reason.

Do MS/AL have something to do with 1968, and NH something to do with 2000?

You're correct with 2000, but not 1968. You're on the right track though.

The red and green ones all went for Gore in 2000 (or were lost by Bush in 2000, depending on how you want to look at it), so that's a starting point.
Logged
Smid
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,151
Australia


« Reply #101 on: May 10, 2010, 10:27:46 PM »


I would have guessed something along the lines of "% of the population identifying as mormon" (Utah's strongest, lesser in the states above Utah, weakest in the strong baptist areas of the south), except that Oklahoma is unshaded. This suggests to me that it's some sort of third party results map.
Logged
Smid
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,151
Australia


« Reply #102 on: June 29, 2010, 08:30:33 PM »


I find it interesting that Alaska, DC and Hawaii are all in grey. Is it presidential from before they had EVs?
Logged
Smid
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,151
Australia


« Reply #103 on: July 02, 2010, 09:50:02 PM »


Still no idea, but I notice that Map 2 has ten different colours/categories, perhaps that will help others with it a little?
Logged
Smid
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,151
Australia


« Reply #104 on: June 27, 2011, 07:54:49 PM »

Can't be Anderson, because he did well in both NH and VT, according to my memory.
In 88, I think Paul got nearly nation wide ballot access aside from Missouri. I'm not gonna count Perot 92, but maybe 96. Maybe it's Gene in 1976. Just throwing ideas out there.

NOTE: I saw this before I posted (see below)
1968

And Dallas totally didn't feed me the answer.

Dalls totally didn't tell me something too.

Possibly Congressional?
Logged
Smid
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,151
Australia


« Reply #105 on: February 01, 2013, 10:22:04 PM »

Okay guys, guess what this is:



Rep Candidate 271
Dem Candidate 267

I'm guessing "unlikely"?
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.052 seconds with 12 queries.