Provisional Parliament: Voting on Amendment

[Leinad]

Aye.

[TNF]

The vote has passed.

And that concludes the Provisional Parliament, ladies and gents.

[Leinad]

The vote has passed.

And that concludes the Provisional Parliament, ladies and gents.

I'd say it went well. A little rushed, here and there, but it got the job done. That guy with the yellow GA avatar needed to shut up, but most members were pretty good.

Anyways, I think I speak for all of us when I say: let's do this!

[Cranberry]

The vote has passed.

And that concludes the Provisional Parliament, ladies and gents.

I'd say it went well. A little rushed, here and there, but it got the job done. That guy with the yellow GA avatar needed to shut up, but most members were pretty good.

Anyways, I think I speak for all of us when I say: let's do this!

Speaking of yourself in third person really doesn't make you any more likeable.

[Leinad]

The vote has passed.

And that concludes the Provisional Parliament, ladies and gents.

I'd say it went well. A little rushed, here and there, but it got the job done. That guy with the yellow GA avatar needed to shut up, but most members were pretty good.

Anyways, I think I speak for all of us when I say: let's do this!

Speaking of yourself in third person really doesn't make you any more likeable.

Eh, I generally find self-deprecating humor makes people more likeable, although I wasn't really trying to improve my likeability. I was just trying to make a joke in that sentence--the main point of the post was stating my opinion that the Provisional Parliament was successful in it's job, and to voice eagerness in starting the real thing.

I'm not sure what purpose critiquing my posts does, but hey, whatever floats your boat, I guess.

[Cranberry]

The vote has passed.

And that concludes the Provisional Parliament, ladies and gents.

I'd say it went well. A little rushed, here and there, but it got the job done. That guy with the yellow GA avatar needed to shut up, but most members were pretty good.

Anyways, I think I speak for all of us when I say: let's do this!

Speaking of yourself in third person really doesn't make you any more likeable.

Eh, I generally find self-deprecating humor makes people more likeable, although I wasn't really trying to improve my likeability. I was just trying to make a joke in that sentence--the main point of the post was stating my opinion that the Provisional Parliament was successful in it's job, and to voice eagerness in starting the real thing.

I'm not sure what purpose critiquing my posts does, but hey, whatever floats your boat, I guess.

Well, if that was a joke, then we really have quite a different sense of humour.

Does critiquing needs a specific purpose? Is it not more acquainting someone of your opinion on a certain action of your opposite? The case could be made that such is a purpose, in which case we have found that specific purpose you were speaking of, but that should be left to every one's individual interpretation, should it not?

[Leinad]

I'd say it went well. A little rushed, here and there, but it got the job done. That guy with the yellow GA avatar needed to shut up, but most members were pretty good.

Anyways, I think I speak for all of us when I say: let's do this!

Speaking of yourself in third person really doesn't make you any more likeable.

Eh, I generally find self-deprecating humor makes people more likeable, although I wasn't really trying to improve my likeability. I was just trying to make a joke in that sentence--the main point of the post was stating my opinion that the Provisional Parliament was successful in it's job, and to voice eagerness in starting the real thing.

I'm not sure what purpose critiquing my posts does, but hey, whatever floats your boat, I guess.

Well, if that was a joke, then we really have quite a different sense of humour.

Does critiquing needs a specific purpose? Is it not more acquainting someone of your opinion on a certain action of your opposite? The case could be made that such is a purpose, in which case we have found that specific purpose you were speaking of, but that should be left to every one's individual interpretation, should it not?

I wouldn't be shocked if we did have quite different senses of humor--mine seems to be not-normal. Oftentimes my jokes are kind of subtle (which is sometimes the nice word for "not funny enough to even tell it was a joke").

Yeah, you're right, it doesn't need a specific purpose, and it should be left up to the individual. Hence my line of "whatever floats your boat." Just as how you are allowed to critique me, shouldn't I be allowed to critique your critiquing of me? Especially when your critique seemed to be based on the faulty premise that I value being liked above all.

Anyway, I look forward to working with you and the others when this begins for real!

[Cranberry]

I'd say it went well. A little rushed, here and there, but it got the job done. That guy with the yellow GA avatar needed to shut up, but most members were pretty good.

Anyways, I think I speak for all of us when I say: let's do this!

Speaking of yourself in third person really doesn't make you any more likeable.

Eh, I generally find self-deprecating humor makes people more likeable, although I wasn't really trying to improve my likeability. I was just trying to make a joke in that sentence--the main point of the post was stating my opinion that the Provisional Parliament was successful in it's job, and to voice eagerness in starting the real thing.

I'm not sure what purpose critiquing my posts does, but hey, whatever floats your boat, I guess.

Well, if that was a joke, then we really have quite a different sense of humour.

Does critiquing needs a specific purpose? Is it not more acquainting someone of your opinion on a certain action of your opposite? The case could be made that such is a purpose, in which case we have found that specific purpose you were speaking of, but that should be left to every one's individual interpretation, should it not?

I wouldn't be shocked if we did have quite different senses of humor--mine seems to be not-normal. Oftentimes my jokes are kind of subtle (which is sometimes the nice word for "not funny enough to even tell it was a joke").

Yeah, you're right, it doesn't need a specific purpose, and it should be left up to the individual. Hence my line of "whatever floats your boat." Just as how you are allowed to critique me, shouldn't I be allowed to critique your critiquing of me? Especially when your critique seemed to be based on the faulty premise that I value being liked above all.

Anyway, I look forward to working with you and the others when this begins for real!

"Subtle" would not be the first word I would use to describe what I have seen thus far of your sense of humour, but alas, to each the way he wants (or does this sound strange when being used in English, the language barrier leaves me wondering...)

I don't recall ever "not allowing" you your right of critiquing me, hence I am afraid I am not really able to grasp your argumentation in this paragraph.