Gravis-NV Heck has large advantage (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 06:57:12 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 Senatorial Election Polls
  Gravis-NV Heck has large advantage (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Gravis-NV Heck has large advantage  (Read 4846 times)
Coolface Sock #42069
whitesox130
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,695
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.39, S: 2.26

« on: July 23, 2015, 06:10:34 PM »

Keep in mind that Nevada voters almost elected that loathsome disgrace Shelley Berkley to the Senate. If she can come so close to beating an incumbent, I'm not so sure that Heck will have an easy time winning this seat. Ugh, NV Democrats are awful.

Heller was an interim Incumbent, which is basically not really an incumbent.
Not as far as predicting elections goes. They have about the same win/loss records as people running for open seats.
Logged
Coolface Sock #42069
whitesox130
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,695
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.39, S: 2.26

« Reply #1 on: July 23, 2015, 06:18:56 PM »

Is there any data to show how well appointed incumbents do compared to actual incumbents?  Neither Heller nor Berkley had been on the ballot statewide before.  Berkley probably had an advantage because her district was so overpopulated at the time so she was representing more voters.
Larry Sabato had something about it when he was talking about the 2014 Montana Senate race right after John Walsh was appointed to the seat, but I don't remember how in-depth it got.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 13 queries.