Suffolk University/USA Today: Hillary leads all Republicans (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 02:15:52 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  Suffolk University/USA Today: Hillary leads all Republicans (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Suffolk University/USA Today: Hillary leads all Republicans  (Read 2571 times)
EliteLX
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,037
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.64, S: 0.85

« on: July 14, 2015, 05:57:53 PM »

Hmm.. nice numbers for Bush that he's closing out the gap this early on.

As far as Walker & Pauls numbers? Doesn't sound too right to me. If old-man-jenkins (McCain) & Palin (LOL) are behind at a 6-7% loss on an extremely fresh & new historical candidate at the end of a very unpopular term for the previous president, Rand Paul & Walker wouldn't be falling behind 11%+, not even close.
Logged
EliteLX
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,037
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.64, S: 0.85

« Reply #1 on: July 15, 2015, 12:35:23 AM »

Nice to see Clinton still leads Jeb.

Still mindblowing to me to see people believe that woman has more of a track record, accomplishment, and eligibility for commander in chief of the greatest nation in the world than Jeb Bush. Laughable, almost.
Logged
EliteLX
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,037
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.64, S: 0.85

« Reply #2 on: July 15, 2015, 03:11:21 PM »
« Edited: July 15, 2015, 03:19:39 PM by EliteLX »

Nice to see Clinton still leads Jeb.

Still mindblowing to me to see people believe that woman has more of a track record, accomplishment, and eligibility for commander in chief of the greatest nation in the world than Jeb Bush. Laughable, almost.
Out of all the criticisms one could lob at Clinton you chose lack of experience?  8 years as an active first lady, 8 years in the Senate, and 4 years as Secretary of State would make her perhaps the most prepared candidate running.  This is almost indisputably true on foreign policy.

Pretty much any attack against Clinton would be better than the angle you're trying to pull off.

Sure does sound nice all on paper, yes? Wow, she's ready to be commander in chief. Eh, not so fast. When you look a bit further Hillary still is lacking the eligibility and the only reason she IS electable is because she's the Kim Kardashian of politics, a damn celebrity, not a commander in chief.

8 years as FL - What!? haha. Sure, a lot of time around the environment, but this "record" really doesn't accompany nearly any requirements of office. It offers no fiscal experience, legislative experience, and rarely any political experience. Social experience? Uh, sure.. but. That can be achieved in many other areas. So uh, nothing here for Hillary.

8 years NY senator - Her senate office time was piss-poor, barely having her name pass through any significant legislation at all. She was extremely ineffective, with nearly none of her sponsored legislation heading into law. Of 337 bills that Hillary has introduced, only 2 have become law. It's not the easiest to pass a bill but Hillary spins out empty legislation like it was her job. She accomplished very very little, and never stood up and LEAD the battle for the senate on key issues. GovTrack.us has Hillary Clinton ranked 24th out of her 39 democrats in the department at the time in getting her bills to the committee, essentially being poor at getting much done in her time there. Most of her legislature was press-picture legislation, or "look-nice" legislation. Such as dozens of her pieces being nothing but congratulating certain organizations or people, "permitting the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for a ceremony to honor Constantino Brumidi on the 200th anniversary of his birth. (!?!?!)", I could go on. Hillary has nothing to stand on during her 8 years, a very VERY average senator at absolute best.

4 Years as SS - I.. I don't even need to go here. Dishonesty, controversy and scandal that has been revealed, and poor handling of situations across the board. She's everything but a shining star of a Secretary of State.

Hillary is the Kim Kardashian of her party and that's the only thing making her electable, and even Dems know that deep down. She has no actual shining track record and she's not ready to lead the greatest country in the world. I will stand by that until the day I die.
Logged
EliteLX
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,037
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.64, S: 0.85

« Reply #3 on: July 15, 2015, 09:59:24 PM »
« Edited: July 15, 2015, 10:03:18 PM by EliteLX »

I suggest mental hospital EliteLX. You seem possessed.

What? That's the best thing you have? I'm possessed for making a perfectly viable point? Hillary Clinton, in comparison to some of the track records and achievements of some Dems and Pubs in '16, is a joke. She has no notable achievments or battles at ALL from her Senate term, Secretary State has her being caught for a lot of lies with foreign nations, taking money from them for their organization, controversial Benghazi and email gate. First Lady really isn't that much special. If THAT'S what you trust to determine someones  executive experience you shouldn't vote.

You don't just throw out a poor insult and have absolutely no basis when I made a perfectly reasonable point, doesn't quite work like that.
Logged
EliteLX
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,037
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.64, S: 0.85

« Reply #4 on: July 15, 2015, 10:00:56 PM »
« Edited: July 16, 2015, 12:59:39 PM by EliteLX »

I suggest mental hospital EliteLX. You seem possessed.

What? That's the best thing you have? I'm possessed for making a perfectly viable point? Hillary Clinton, in comparison to some of the track records and achievements of some Dems and Pubs in '16, is a joke. She has no notable achievments or battles at ALL from her Senate term, Secretary State has her being caught for a lot of lies with foreign nations, taking money from them for their organization, controversial Benghazi and email gate. First Lady really isn't that much special. If THAT'S what you trust to determine someones  executive experience you shouldn't vote.

You don't just throw out a poor insult and have absolutely no basis when I made a perfectly reasonable point, doesn't quite work like that.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.031 seconds with 13 queries.