SC-Opinion Savvy/InsiderAdvantage: Bush ahead, Walker slides, Christie @ 0% (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 02:37:29 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
  SC-Opinion Savvy/InsiderAdvantage: Bush ahead, Walker slides, Christie @ 0% (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: SC-Opinion Savvy/InsiderAdvantage: Bush ahead, Walker slides, Christie @ 0%  (Read 1355 times)
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,181
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84
« on: June 25, 2015, 01:47:29 PM »
They polled all 16 announced or likely candidates:

19.0% Bush
13.2% Carson
12.5% Graham
  9.7% Trump
  8.7% Huckabee
  5.1% Rubio
  3.8% Paul
  3.0% Perry
  2.9% Cruz
  1.9% Walker
  1.6% Fiorina
  0.6% Santorum
  0.4% Jindal
  0.4% Kasich
  0.4% Pataki
  0.0% Christie
16.9% Undecided

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

http://opinionsavvy.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/SCPres6.23.15.pdf
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,181
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84
« Reply #1 on: June 25, 2015, 01:50:45 PM »

In such a splintered field, it actually makes sense to publish polls with decimals.

For example if you have a sample of 458 and 2 persons vote for Kasich, you get 0.4%

He does not have 0% or 1%, he simply has 0.4% ...

Decimals do not make polls inaccurate.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 14 queries.