OH-Quinnipiac: Portman trails Strickland, crushes Sittenfeld (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 06:17:21 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 Senatorial Election Polls
  OH-Quinnipiac: Portman trails Strickland, crushes Sittenfeld (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: OH-Quinnipiac: Portman trails Strickland, crushes Sittenfeld  (Read 2541 times)
International Brotherhood of Bernard
interstate73
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 651


« on: June 22, 2015, 11:01:36 AM »

I can imagine being unabashedly pro-trade (having been Bush's Trade Representative) really hurts Portman in Appalachia (in addition to Strickland's personal popularity there), which is what makes him alot more vulnerable than Toomey is as of right now.
Logged
International Brotherhood of Bernard
interstate73
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 651


« Reply #1 on: June 22, 2015, 02:57:28 PM »

Um. What. No. Specter would not have beaten Toomey.

Specter would have been able to attract more of the right-leaning independent and republican vote than Sestak due to his bipartisan nature and past affilations.
If anything, Specter would've lost by more. The Democratic base was already depressed by the national environment and the gubernatorial election that Corbett was winning in a walk (ah, memories), and only would've been depressed more by having the 2004 GOP primary matchup as the general election, and Republican voters were turned off by his blatant opportunism and flip-flopping. Even if Specter had won Democrats would've lost the seat in 2012 because Specter passed, and Corbett would've appointed a Republican to the seat.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 14 queries.