NH-Dartmouth College: Junk poll shows Republicans ahead of Hillary

[Tender Branson]

Definitely a junk poll.

So junky that I only post the link:

http://rockefeller.dartmouth.edu/library/2015nhstatepoll.pdf

[King]

I really commend Tender for being able to look at the pdf and decipher what the hell the results of that poll were.

[Skye]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

What?

Also, 2016 results:

37/34 Clinton/Christie
37/34 Bush/Clinton
36/33 Clinton/Paul
39/36 Clinton/Huckabee
40/29 Clinton/Cruz
35/34 Clinton/Rubio
39/35 Walker/Clinton

Reading through this poll was hell.

[NeverAgain]

Did they have a third option for the poll? Like: Bush, Clinton, or Reagan reincarnate.

[IceSpear]

I expect better from an Ivy League school.

[Senate Minority Leader Lord Voldemort]

I expect better from an Ivy League school.

Honestly I was thinking the same thing. Didn't at least one of them have to take introductory statistics to end up at Dartmouth? No one could call BS before this was published?

[Ebsy]

According to The New York Times 2012 exit polls, only 62% of voters in New Hampshire were married, but this sample was 70% married. That might be the culprit of the odd results they surfaced with.

[Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers]

Ia is more of a tossup than NH. But, Clinton not leading in NH; is worrisome.  Need to do some campaigning in NH while there are competetive primaries going on, on the GOP to sure up some support.

[Xing]

It seems like several pollsters are having trouble with NH so far...

[pbrower2a]

The focus could be on the caucuses, where D activity will be slight (foregone conclusion) and R activity will be heavy. Once the partisan politics subside some after the caucuses, the rightful focus on the general election will begin.