There are people in this thread literally blaming the (almost) victims of the attack. Nothing justifies trying to shoot people, and to insist that people should just stop doing something because a radical fringe group of people might attack is against the idea of free speech itself.
The irony is that the same people most likely to victim blame when it comes to victims of religious radicals (most often Muslims) are the same people who become enraged when people are questioning of the victim in... other crimes, let's say.
So is the suggestion that we should legislatively ban the practice of a religion we don't like.
Who in this thread supports this position?
