Why did Carter do so well in the plains? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 29, 2024, 01:14:16 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Why did Carter do so well in the plains? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why did Carter do so well in the plains?  (Read 5070 times)
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,107
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
« on: April 21, 2015, 04:02:29 PM »

Or in other words, why did Ford do so bad. This is Republican territory yet North Dakota only was 52-46 for Ford, South Dakota 50-49, Kansas 52-45, and Oklahoma 50-49. Yet Nebraska went 59-38 Ford. Did Carter do better than traditional Democrats in rural areas because of some sort of appeal. Did the 'good old Democrat' nature of his candidacy that won him nearly every southern state have an affect here? I'm struggling to figure this out, and why Nebraska was so Republican too.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 12 queries.