Opinion of threesomes (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 24, 2024, 02:17:19 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Forum Community
  Forum Community (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, YE, KoopaDaQuick 🇵🇸)
  Opinion of threesomes (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: What is your opinion of threesomes?
#1
Freedom Sexual Practice?
 
#2
Horrible Sexual Practice?
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 58

Author Topic: Opinion of threesomes  (Read 4420 times)
Starbucks Union Thug HokeyPuck
HockeyDude
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,376
United States


« on: April 16, 2015, 11:22:35 AM »

What kind of monster would find something wrong with a threesome?  
Logged
Starbucks Union Thug HokeyPuck
HockeyDude
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,376
United States


« Reply #1 on: April 16, 2015, 11:23:16 AM »

I wonder how many around here have actually engaged in the practice. Smiley

Three way makeout sesh (MFF, of course) is as far as I've taken that, unfortunately.  : (
Logged
Starbucks Union Thug HokeyPuck
HockeyDude
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,376
United States


« Reply #2 on: April 17, 2015, 08:35:58 AM »

HSP of course. This thread is inappropriate.

Quote from: Restricted
You must be logged in to read this quote.



What in the good lord's name is this?
[/quote]

Correct me if I'm wrong (Lief) but I believe that is Jesus on a computer.  Presumably reading Update and casting judgment on PAPOY. 
Logged
Starbucks Union Thug HokeyPuck
HockeyDude
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,376
United States


« Reply #3 on: April 17, 2015, 11:53:28 AM »

Yes, that is a Jesus at his 9-5 job as a pharmacy IT specialist.

Bushie-related.

RIP Lief : (
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 14 queries.