PA-Franklin & Marshall: Toomey up 5, tons of undecideds
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
July 15, 2024, 10:05:43 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 Senatorial Election Polls
  PA-Franklin & Marshall: Toomey up 5, tons of undecideds
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: PA-Franklin & Marshall: Toomey up 5, tons of undecideds  (Read 2627 times)
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: March 26, 2015, 04:28:47 PM »

Toomey 34
Sestak 29

http://www.fandm.edu/uploads/files/943825657393157904-franklin-marshall-college-poll-march-2015.pdf
Logged
moderatevoter
ModerateVAVoter
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,381


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: March 26, 2015, 04:43:24 PM »

Polls like this (with obscene amounts of undecideds) are so unhelpful.
Logged
Mr.Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 91,374
Jamaica


Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: March 26, 2015, 05:53:21 PM »

Well, Democratic targets of control of Senate remains: WI, OH, Pa and IL.  Also, FL for the 51 clear majority.
Logged
Free Bird
TheHawk
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,916
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.84, S: -5.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: March 26, 2015, 06:42:46 PM »

Where for art thou, pbrower?
Logged
Miles
MilesC56
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,325
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: March 26, 2015, 07:09:45 PM »

Too high undecideds, but not unusual for an F&M poll.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: March 26, 2015, 07:14:52 PM »

Too high undecideds, but not unusual for an F&M poll.

It would make sense for there to be a decent amount of undecideds considering the relative anonymity of Toomey and Sestak, but this still seems like quite a bit too high.
Logged
Pandaguineapig
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,608
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: March 26, 2015, 07:20:27 PM »

Too high undecideds, but not unusual for an F&M poll.

It would make sense for there to be a decent amount of undecideds considering the relative anonymity of Toomey and Sestak, but this still seems like quite a bit too high.
If you look at their past polls in 2014 and 2012 they have a tendency to have ungodly amounts of undecideds because they don't push leaners
Logged
Senator & Ambassador Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,144
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: March 26, 2015, 08:18:08 PM »

Too high undecideds, but not unusual for an F&M poll.
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,396
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: March 26, 2015, 08:47:30 PM »

Yeah, I guess with this many undecideds, you can't really make any conclusions, other than we'll have to wait and see.
Logged
The Other Castro
Castro2020
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,230
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: March 26, 2015, 10:19:20 PM »

I wish this was Nevada, the winner would be None of These Candidates.
Logged
Ebsy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,001
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: March 26, 2015, 10:23:02 PM »

Well, Democratic targets of control of Senate remains: WI, OH, Pa and IL.  Also, FL for the 51 clear majority.
NH is probably going to be in the mix.
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,930
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: March 27, 2015, 08:48:36 AM »
« Edited: March 27, 2015, 09:25:06 AM by pbrower2a »

Damning in faint praise!

Not in the approve-disapprove format or in something that one can relate to it (like grades of A, B, C, D, and F).

"Excellent", "Good", and "Poor"  are clear enough... but "Fair" is ambiguous. "Fair" performance by a seven-year-old violinist is something that one praises a child for. "Fair" performance by an adult on stage is something that you would feel cheated for buying a ticket to see.

Not usable for my purposes. But 31% "excellent" or "good" isn't good for an incumbent Senator.

High turnout sinks Pat Toomey in 2016. If he hasn't been the sick joke that Tom Cotton or Marco Rubio have become, he is far from solid.
Logged
Flake
Flo
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,688
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: May 10, 2015, 11:58:29 AM »

New Poll: Pennsylvania Senator by Franklin and Marshall College on 2015-03-23

Summary: D: 29%, R: 34%, I: 0%, U: 37%

Poll Source URL: Full Poll Details
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.03 seconds with 13 queries.