PPP: Hillary up by 7-10 nationally
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 28, 2024, 04:26:26 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  PPP: Hillary up by 7-10 nationally
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: PPP: Hillary up by 7-10 nationally  (Read 1322 times)
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,173
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: February 25, 2015, 12:42:43 PM »

February 20-22, 2015
Survey of 691 registered voters

...

Hillary Clinton.................................................. 50%
Jeb Bush......................................................... 40%

Jeb Bush......................................................... 45%
Joe Biden........................................................ 39%

Jeb Bush......................................................... 43%
Elizabeth Warren ............................................ 41%

...

Hillary Clinton.................................................. 48%
Ben Carson..................................................... 40%

Hillary Clinton.................................................. 48%
Chris Christie .................................................. 40%

Hillary Clinton.................................................. 50%
Ted Cruz ......................................................... 40%

Hillary Clinton.................................................. 50%
Mike Huckabee ............................................... 41%

Hillary Clinton.................................................. 47%
Rand Paul ....................................................... 40%

Hillary Clinton.................................................. 48%
Rick Perry ....................................................... 41%

Hillary Clinton.................................................. 48%
Marco Rubio ................................................... 41%

Hillary Clinton.................................................. 48%
Scott Walker ................................................... 40%

...

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/2015/PPP_Release_National_22515.pdf
Logged
Landslide Lyndon
px75
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,611
Greece


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: February 25, 2015, 01:00:57 PM »

No electability gap among Republicans? That's impressive.
Logged
Skill and Chance
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,521
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: February 25, 2015, 01:02:59 PM »

No electability gap among Republicans? That's impressive.

Save for Akin-level gaffes, the parties have very high presidential floors in this era.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,841
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: February 25, 2015, 01:38:07 PM »

No electability gap among Republicans? That's impressive.

I'm skeptical of that. Every other pollster shows at least Cruz doing far worse than everyone else.
Logged
Frozen Sky Ever Why
ShadowOfTheWave
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,610
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: February 25, 2015, 02:01:10 PM »

Bill Clinton's favorable rating is only 49-42?
Logged
Attorney General, LGC Speaker, and Former PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,577
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: February 25, 2015, 03:34:55 PM »

Bill Clinton's favorable rating is only 49-42?
Yes. That should be obvious after his 2014 campaigning didn't help any democrat.
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,841
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: February 25, 2015, 05:28:39 PM »

No electability gap among Republicans? That's impressive.

I'm skeptical of that. Every other pollster shows at least Cruz doing far worse than everyone else.

He's been quiet recently. That's one way to avoid Akin-like gaffes.

...We know what a 7% vote gap in a binary election looks like when the Democrat has the advantage:



One might switch Arizona or Georgia for Indiana.

A 10% gap as a Democratic advantage?



That will be "76 years ago"  in November 2016. Ancient history.

https://la.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franklinus_D._Roosevelt
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,073
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: February 25, 2015, 08:26:31 PM »

fav/unfav %:

Carson 35/17% for +18%
Walker 33/26% for +7%
Huckabee 37/35% for +2%
H. Clinton 45/47% for -2%
Rubio 30/32% for -2%
Warren 29/31% for -2%
Biden 38/47% for -9%
Paul 28/39% for -11%
Perry 28/40% for -12%
Cruz 26/38% for -12%
J. Bush 29/45% for -16%
Christie 28/49% for -21%

Remarkably, even though Christie has the worst net negative rating, he also has the highest raw favorability with Democrats of any of the Republicans tested here.  27% of Dems have a favorable opinion of Christie, just 1% less than his overall favorability.  That tells you how comparatively weak he is with his own party (and Independents).

Also, 21% of Democrats have a favorable opinion of George W. Bush(!), and 18% of Republicans have a favorable opinion of Bill Clinton.

Also, among blacks....

Biden 89/3% for +86%
H. Clinton 79/13% for +66%
Carson 32/23% for +9%
Walker 28/26% for +2%
Christie 38/55% for -17%
J. Bush 16/67% for -51%

Yes, Christie has higher favorable #s among blacks than whites.
Logged
bobloblaw
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,018
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: March 03, 2015, 08:14:26 PM »

No electability gap among Republicans? That's impressive.

I'm skeptical of that. Every other pollster shows at least Cruz doing far worse than everyone else.

He's been quiet recently. That's one way to avoid Akin-like gaffes.

...We know what a 7% vote gap in a binary election looks like when the Democrat has the advantage:



One might switch Arizona or Georgia for Indiana.

A 10% gap as a Democratic advantage?



That will be "76 years ago"  in November 2016. Ancient history.

https://la.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franklinus_D._Roosevelt

Indiana wont go Dem even with a 7% margin. IN in 2008 was a fluke.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.037 seconds with 13 queries.