MA: Amendment to Article I, Section 5 (Passed)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 05:55:54 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government
  Regional Governments (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  MA: Amendment to Article I, Section 5 (Passed)
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3
Author Topic: MA: Amendment to Article I, Section 5 (Passed)  (Read 2981 times)
Boston Bread
New Canadaland
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,636
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -5.00, S: -5.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: March 03, 2015, 09:16:07 PM »

JCL, can you explain the importance of section 4? Ultimately I would accept either mine or Shua's amendments but the rest of the assembly seems to agree that section 4 isn't necessary in its current form.
Logged
MyRescueKittehRocks
JohanusCalvinusLibertas
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,763
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: March 03, 2015, 10:01:45 PM »

JCL, can you explain the importance of section 4? Ultimately I would accept either mine or Shua's amendments but the rest of the assembly seems to agree that section 4 isn't necessary in its current form.

Clause 4 explains the possible cases of needing the Lt. Gov. to cast a decide a tie breaking vote. I'm just trying to understand why my fellow assemblymen don't see the need for clause 4. I'm willing to work with either amendment.
Logged
Boston Bread
New Canadaland
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,636
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -5.00, S: -5.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: March 03, 2015, 10:27:03 PM »

I believe tie-breaking procedure should be more flexible so it does a better job of breaking gridlock, but I'm willing to compromise.
Logged
🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸
shua
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,687
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 1.29, S: -0.70

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: March 03, 2015, 10:35:28 PM »

JCL, can you explain the importance of section 4? Ultimately I would accept either mine or Shua's amendments but the rest of the assembly seems to agree that section 4 isn't necessary in its current form.

Clause 4 explains the possible cases of needing the Lt. Gov. to cast a decide a tie breaking vote. I'm just trying to understand why my fellow assemblymen don't see the need for clause 4. I'm willing to work with either amendment.

Do you believe we need to limit when the LG can break ties?
Logged
MyRescueKittehRocks
JohanusCalvinusLibertas
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,763
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: March 04, 2015, 07:57:49 PM »

JCL, can you explain the importance of section 4? Ultimately I would accept either mine or Shua's amendments but the rest of the assembly seems to agree that section 4 isn't necessary in its current form.

Clause 4 explains the possible cases of needing the Lt. Gov. to cast a decide a tie breaking vote. I'm just trying to understand why my fellow assemblymen don't see the need for clause 4. I'm willing to work with either amendment.

Do you believe we need to limit when the LG can break ties?

I'm trying to figure a way to give him/her this power but still maintain separation of powers and prevent abuse of said power. Giving an absolute tie breaker vote may subvert that.
Logged
Boston Bread
New Canadaland
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,636
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -5.00, S: -5.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: March 05, 2015, 01:05:10 PM »

Let's start sorting this out. I will call a vote on Shua's amendment. Please vote Aye, Nay, or Abstain.
Logged
MyRescueKittehRocks
JohanusCalvinusLibertas
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,763
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: March 05, 2015, 05:28:46 PM »

Abstain
Logged
🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸
shua
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,687
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 1.29, S: -0.70

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: March 05, 2015, 08:27:23 PM »

Aye
Logged
Boston Bread
New Canadaland
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,636
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -5.00, S: -5.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #33 on: March 07, 2015, 02:05:50 PM »

Abstain
Logged
Boston Bread
New Canadaland
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,636
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -5.00, S: -5.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #34 on: March 08, 2015, 12:10:19 PM »

There has been enough voting time on Shua's amendment, and it has passed 1-0, 2 abstaining.
Assemblyman JCL, would you rather have a vote on my amendment or a final vote now? Like I said I would accept either of the two amendments.
Logged
MyRescueKittehRocks
JohanusCalvinusLibertas
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,763
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #35 on: March 09, 2015, 05:11:29 PM »

There has been enough voting time on Shua's amendment, and it has passed 1-0, 2 abstaining.
Assemblyman JCL, would you rather have a vote on my amendment or a final vote now? Like I said I would accept either of the two amendments.

I'd like to request a vote on your amendment.
Logged
Boston Bread
New Canadaland
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,636
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -5.00, S: -5.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #36 on: March 10, 2015, 11:01:26 AM »

I am calling a vote on my amendment. Please vote Aye, Nay, or Abstain. Note that Shua's amendment will be replaced if it passes.
Logged
🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸
shua
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,687
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 1.29, S: -0.70

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #37 on: March 10, 2015, 08:20:22 PM »

Nay
Logged
MyRescueKittehRocks
JohanusCalvinusLibertas
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,763
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #38 on: March 11, 2015, 03:12:50 PM »

Aye
Logged
Boston Bread
New Canadaland
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,636
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -5.00, S: -5.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #39 on: March 11, 2015, 03:31:58 PM »

Aye
Logged
Boston Bread
New Canadaland
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,636
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -5.00, S: -5.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #40 on: March 12, 2015, 09:01:19 AM »

The amendment has passed 2-1. A final vote will follow if there is no additional debate by tomorrow.
Logged
🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸
shua
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,687
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 1.29, S: -0.70

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #41 on: March 13, 2015, 01:28:19 AM »

I have an amendment removing the two clauses which I consider superfluous given their enactment is assumed by the process of adopting a constitutional amendment.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Also I think we may need to clarify what is meant by a "deadlock."
Logged
Boston Bread
New Canadaland
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,636
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -5.00, S: -5.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #42 on: March 13, 2015, 09:25:17 AM »

I support Shua's suggestions. Regarding the ambiguity of a deadlock, I am proposing a modified amendment to clarify what a deadlock is.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Shua, would this suffice?
Logged
🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸
shua
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,687
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 1.29, S: -0.70

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #43 on: March 13, 2015, 06:16:17 PM »

I'll go ahead and amend it further to show the kind of clarification i think we need:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
Boston Bread
New Canadaland
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,636
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -5.00, S: -5.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #44 on: March 13, 2015, 09:47:35 PM »

I accept Shua's suggestion. I withdraw my amendment.
Logged
MyRescueKittehRocks
JohanusCalvinusLibertas
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,763
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #45 on: March 13, 2015, 10:41:10 PM »

Why is clause 5 marked out?
Logged
🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸
shua
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,687
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 1.29, S: -0.70

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #46 on: March 13, 2015, 10:46:10 PM »

Constitutional Amendments always go into force upon their ratification, unless stated otherwise, so it isn't necessary.
Logged
MyRescueKittehRocks
JohanusCalvinusLibertas
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,763
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #47 on: March 13, 2015, 10:50:47 PM »

Constitutional Amendments always go into force upon their ratification, unless stated otherwise, so it isn't necessary.

Then I'm ok with it.
Logged
Boston Bread
New Canadaland
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,636
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -5.00, S: -5.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #48 on: March 14, 2015, 05:44:36 PM »

I am calling a vote on Shua's most recent amendment. Please vote Aye, Nay, or Abstain.
Logged
Negusa Nagast 🚀
Nagas
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,826
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #49 on: March 14, 2015, 06:11:12 PM »

Aye
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.041 seconds with 12 queries.