Why didn't Bill Clinton reach 50% in 1996? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 08:41:16 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Why didn't Bill Clinton reach 50% in 1996? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why didn't Bill Clinton reach 50% in 1996?  (Read 3187 times)
Starbucks Union Thug HokeyPuck
HockeyDude
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,376
United States


« on: February 20, 2015, 07:05:28 AM »

Everyone knew that Bill would win in a landslide, which caused low turnout.

Everyone new Reagan would win in 1984 and there was still high turnout

Reagan was much more of a polarizing figure than Clinton ever was.

In which planet was Reagan more polarizing,  Reagan won 49 states, 525 electoral votes, and 58.8% of the vote in 1984 and left office with 63% approval and because of him Bush won 400+ electoral votes in 1988.

Clinton won 379 electoral votes and 31 states in his reelection campaign and was impeached(Unjustifiably sure but that doesn't make him less polarizing). Clinton had 66% approval leaving office and his Vice President Gore lost in 2000.

Clinton was tied with Reagan in greatness but he was more polarizing then Reagan.






Gore lost because he ran away from Clinton's record, not because Clinton was polarizing.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 12 queries.