Challenge: describe a Smith 1928 / Hoover 1932 voter
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 29, 2024, 10:04:45 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Challenge: describe a Smith 1928 / Hoover 1932 voter
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Challenge: describe a Smith 1928 / Hoover 1932 voter  (Read 1254 times)
buritobr
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,675


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: January 15, 2015, 06:55:57 PM »

In Massachusetts, Smith margin in 1928 was 1% and FDR margin in 1932 was 4%. So, only a 3% swing. Much smaller than the national swing of 36%.

If one considers that the Hoover 1928 / FDR 1932 voters (it's the economy stupid voters) in Massachusetts were more than 3%, there were some Smith 1928 / Hoover 1932 voters. Who were them?


Smith was a Smith 1928 / Roosevelt 1932 / Landon 1936 voter
Logged
Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl
Libertas
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,899
Finland


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: January 16, 2015, 02:12:23 AM »

If you look closely at Catholic Southern Louisiana (you can look at my own maps posted in this section of the forum), you can notice there is a dropoff in Democratic support with several >80% Dem counties dropping to >70% Dem counties due to the fact that FDR was not a Catholic and was not doing as well among Catholic voters compared to Al Smith.

In general I'd say a Smith '28/Hoover '32 voter was a staunch Republican-but even stauncher Catholic- who voted for Al Smith out of Catholic identity loyalty in 1928 but then reverted to the GOP in 1932.
Logged
Intell
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,812
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: -6.71, S: -1.24

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: January 16, 2015, 02:21:14 AM »

Catholics.
Logged
Libertarian Socialist Dem
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 345
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: January 16, 2015, 04:10:11 AM »

Most Catholics (other then Italians) were Democrats at that time, someone specifically who would have jumped from Smith to Hoover would have to be someone with a particular axe to grind like a Tammany Hall oriented NYC Democrat who was aligned against FDR's upstate wing of the party and maybe had been denied a patronage job.
Logged
Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl
Libertas
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,899
Finland


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: January 16, 2015, 05:00:52 PM »

Most Catholics (other then Italians) were Democrats at that time, someone specifically who would have jumped from Smith to Hoover would have to be someone with a particular axe to grind like a Tammany Hall oriented NYC Democrat who was aligned against FDR's upstate wing of the party and maybe had been denied a patronage job.

What explains the drop-off in support among Catholics in Catholic Southern Louisiana? There was no third-party candidate to possibly explain why FDR got a smaller percentage of the vote in some counties in Acadiana than Al Smith did, in case that's what you were thinking. Several counties fell from >80% Smith '28 to >70% FDR '32.

1928


1932
Logged
Libertarian Socialist Dem
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 345
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: January 16, 2015, 06:51:19 PM »

Most Catholics (other then Italians) were Democrats at that time, someone specifically who would have jumped from Smith to Hoover would have to be someone with a particular axe to grind like a Tammany Hall oriented NYC Democrat who was aligned against FDR's upstate wing of the party and maybe had been denied a patronage job.

What explains the drop-off in support among Catholics in Catholic Southern Louisiana? There was no third-party candidate to possibly explain why FDR got a smaller percentage of the vote in some counties in Acadiana than Al Smith did, in case that's what you were thinking. Several counties fell from >80% Smith '28 to >70% FDR '32.

1928


1932



Touché
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 12 queries.