Gallup 65 country poll: "Would you fight for your country in case of war ?"

[Tender Branson]

Year-end 2014 poll in 65 countries:

You must be logged in to read this quote.

http://www.wingia.com/en/services/end_of_year_survey_2014/regional_country_results/8/46/

I compiled a summary:

"If there were a war that involved [your country], would you be willing to fight for your country?"

(ranked by net balance)

94-05 Fiji [+89]
94-06 Morocco [+88]
85-01 Azerbaijan [+84]
89-07 Pakistan [+82]
89-09 Vietnam [+80]
84-08 Papua New Guinea [+76]
86-12 Bangladesh [+74]
72-13 Thailand [+59]
76-18 Georgia [+58]
75-17 India [+58]
76-20 Afghanistan [+56]
69-13 Kazakhstan [+56]
74-20 Finland [+54]
70-17 Indonesia [+53]
66-13 Israel [+53]
73-21 Turkey [+52]
72-23 Armenia [+49]
71-23 China [+48]
63-18 Malaysia [+45]
70-26 Philippines [+44]
69-27 Kenya [+42]
55-15 Sweden [+40]
59-20 Russia [+39]
62-24 Ukraine [+38]
66-30 Lebanon [+36]
58-24 Kosovo [+34]
64-32 Panama [+32]
61-32 Peru [+29]
56-27 Palestinian Territories [+29]
54-27 Greece [+27]
61-36 Colombia [+25]
54-35 Ecuador [+19]
55-39 Bosnia & Herzegovina [+16]
56-41 Mexico [+15]
41-27 Latvia [+14]
47-34 Poland [+13]
44-31 USA [+13]
46-36 Serbia [+10]
50-46 Nigeria [+4]
48-44 Brazil [+4]

43-43 Argentina [+/-0]
37-37 Denmark [+/-0]

38-40 Ireland [-2]
38-41 Romania [-3]
39-47 Switzerland [-8]
42-50 South Korea [-8]
38-49 Macedonia [-9]
30-43 Australia [-13]
30-45 Canada [-15]
29-44 France [-15]
28-47 Portugal [-19]
25-47 Bulgaria [-22]
27-51 UK [-24]
26-52 Iceland [-26]
21-49 Spain [-28]
10-43 Japan [-33]
23-57 Hong Kong [-34]
19-56 Belgium [-37]
23-64 Czech Republic [-41]
21-62 Austria [-41]
18-62 Germany [-44]
20-68 Italy [-48]
15-64 Netherlands [-49]

Iraq: no data
Saudi Arabia: no data

[politicus]

"If there were a war that involved [your country], would you be willing to fight for your country?"

(ranked by net balance)

37-37 Denmark [+/-0]

Pathetic.

EDIT: Well, maybe understandable after Iraq and Afghanistan.

15-64 Netherlands [-49]

In need of some Dutch courage.

[Sol]

Sweden higher than 'Murica?

[Antonio V]

I wouldn't, to be honest.

[politicus]

Sweden higher than 'Murica?

Sweden has a proud military tradition and they have been used to the idea of having to defend themselves being neutral under the Cold War. Look at Finland with 74-20 [+54]. Scandinavian countries are not pacifist.

[*Equip Sunglasses*]

Wonder what Phil thinks of Italy after those numbers. Actually I'll say for this: Germany, Italy and the Netherlands = Freedom Countries

[politicus]

27-51 UK [-24].

Good thing the Battle of Britain is not fought today.

EDIT: Well, maybe understandable after Iraq and Afghanistan. Homeland defence would be a different matter.

[Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl]

No, I wouldn't. The U.S. is pretty much 100% guaranteed to be the aggressor.

On the other hand its understandable for countries like Finland, Sweden, Poland to have a different view considering their history of being bullied by their giant neighbor to the East. (Finland not being in NATO, I think has done a lot of joint military exercises and cooperation with Sweden in the event of Russian aggression despite the USSR's embarrassment in the Winter War). It's pretty much unthinkable that Finland or Sweden would start a war of aggression, but there is unfortunately a nonzero chance they may need to fight a defensive war if Putin really goes mad.

Italy really isn't under any threat by anybody. If Italy went to war it would probably be because Berlusconi or someone like him is in power and joins a U.S. coalition in a war of aggression, like they did with Iraq. Netherlands is in even less danger of having to defend itself.

[Deus Naturae]

I certainly wouldn't. If the US was actually being invaded I'd probably just head to Canada.

[Famous Mortimer]

This is a dumb question. I can't answer categorically one way or the other. It would depend on the specific conflict.

[Vosem]

This is a dumb question, because you don't really know how you'd react when your courage is tested up until it is. I hope the answer is yes (and I would answer 'yes' to this question), but there's no real way to tell.

Nice to see Israel way ahead of Palestine, though.

[Hatman 🍁]

Yup, junk poll. For many people, it would depend on circumstances. Nonetheless, I'm surprised to see Canada so low. Good, I guess?

[MaxQue]

Yup, junk poll. For many people, it would depend on circumstances. Nonetheless, I'm surprised to see Canada so low. Good, I guess?

Canada always had a strong anti-militarist streak in some areas and the unpopularity of Afghanistan War probably doesn't help.

[Consciously Unconscious]

I probably wouldn't enlist, but if I was drafted I don't think I'd dodge the draft. 

[SNJ1985]

Here are statistics on the same subject from 1990:

http://www.nationmaster.com/country-info/stats/Lifestyle/Will-fight-for-country

[Lief 🐋]

I certainly wouldn't. If the US was actually being invaded I'd probably just head to Canada.

[Boston Bread]

A breakdown by gender might be interesting here.

If countries like Sweden are that high up then...
http://satwcomic.com/swedish-army
(humon comic)

[Murica!]

If someone invaded the USA I'd go Makhno(i.e fighting both sides and creating an anarchist society).

[Associate Justice PiT]

This is a dumb question. I can't answer categorically one way or the other. It would depend on the specific conflict.

     Pretty much, I have no idea how I would answer this question given a binary like this. As an aside, I'm rather surprised that Switzerland is that low. It'd probably be higher if we factored out the French parts (i.e. fake Switzerland).

[NewYorkExpress]

I wonder how many American Democrats said no...

[Ban my account ffs!]

It would depend very much on the circumstances.

[She's everything. He's just scum.]

If the US itself were actually threatened (i.e a Hitler-esque figure seized power in Mexico and proceeded to conduct a Blitzkrieg-style aerial assault and ground invasion)? Yes.

Run-of-the-mill neocon war of choice to protect our strategic interests/liberate the oppressed people of Absurdistan? No.

[politicus]

Here are statistics on the same subject from 1990:

http://www.nationmaster.com/country-info/stats/Lifestyle/Will-fight-for-country

Yes, they had Scandinavian countries at the top.

1      Norway    90%    1990    
1    Sweden    90%    1990    
3    Denmark    89%    1990    
4    Finland    86%    1990

This was in the immediate post-Cold War era where war was thought of as "attack on your country" in Europe. The participation in Iraq/Afghanistan changed that. I think Denmark having the highest losses per capita in Afghanistan played a big role in our drop. In Finland and Sweden the question is likely still interpreted as defense of homeland.

"Would you defend your country if it was attacked?" would be a more interesting question.

[politicus]

5    United States    78%    1990    
6    Australia    75%            1990    
=7    Switzerland    74%    1990    
=7    United Kingdom 74%    1990    
9    Netherlands    69%    1990

US fifth with Vietnam almost a generation behind and long before Iraq/Afghanistan. Britain post-Falkland was also quite high. The Brits had second highest per capita loss in Afghanistan and also high per capita loss in  Iraq.

It is interesting that the Netherlands were actually in top 10 back then, and they have not had the same losses in overseas operations as Britain and Denmark.

The humiliation in Srebrenica shouldn't be that influential. Again I think that the lack of a realistic threat to the homeland is crucial, still the collapse in willingness to fight has been far larger in the Netherlands than in other similar countries.

[Insula Dei]

5    United States    78%    1990    
6    Australia    75%            1990    
=7    Switzerland    74%    1990    
=7    United Kingdom 74%    1990    
9    Netherlands    69%    1990

US fifth with Vietnam almost a generation behind and long before Iraq/Afghanistan. Britain post-Falkland was also quite high. The Brits had second highest per capita loss in Afghanistan and also high per capita loss in  Iraq.

It is interesting that the Netherlands were actually in top 10 back then, and they have not had the same losses in overseas operations as Britain and Denmark.

The humiliation in Srbrenica shouldn't be that influential. Again I think that the lack of a realistic threat to the homeland is crucial, still the collapse in willingness to fight has been far larger in the Netherlands than in other similar countries.

Never ever mention Srebrenica to a Dutchman.

And it's not as if that's the only reason for Dutch national confidence to take a bit of a fall over the last 25 years.