Quinnipiac: Casey increases lead over Santorum
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 07, 2025, 11:17:05 AM
News: Election Calculator 3.0 with county/house maps is now live. For more info, click here

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Virginiá, KaiserDave)
  Quinnipiac: Casey increases lead over Santorum
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Quinnipiac: Casey increases lead over Santorum  (Read 4817 times)
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: April 20, 2005, 09:33:34 AM »

In a thread that's going to probably get a million replies...

http://www.quinnipiac.edu/x11379.xml?ReleaseID=676

April 20, 2005 - Casey Widens Lead In Pennsylvania Senate Race, Quinnipiac University Poll Finds; Schiavo, Social Security Take Toll On Santorum
State Treasurer Robert Casey, Jr., has a 49 - 35 percent lead over incumbent Republican U.S. Sen. Rick Santorum in the 2006 Senate race, according to a Quinnipiac poll released today.

This compares to a 46 - 41 percent Casey lead in a February 16 poll by the independent Quinnipiac (KWIN uh-pe-ack) University.

Pennsylvania voters give Sen. Santorum a 48 - 35 percent approval rating, down from 52 - 31 percent Feb. 16 and comparable to his all-time low of 47 - 30 percent.

Voters reject 55 - 37 percent President George W. Bush's plan to privatize Social Security and 38 percent say they are less likely to vote for Santorum because of his support for Bush's proposal. Another 15 percent say they are more likely to vote for Santorum and 43 percent say his Social Security position does not make a difference.

Only 14 percent of Pennsylvania voters are more likely to vote for Santorum because of his highly visible role in the Terri Schiavo case, with 34 percent who say they are less likely and 47 percent who say it does not make a difference.

"The numbers show clearly that Sen. Santorum has lost ground in his re-election bid over the last two months. The Senator has come under strong criticism for his outspoken involvement in the Schiavo case and his campaigning for President Bush's unpopular Social Security proposal," said Clay F. Richards, assistant director of the Quinnipiac University Polling Institute.

"Sen. Santorum also has been targeted in press reports for his strong conservative stands, and for appearing to moderate those stands in an election year. In short, Santorum has become a more controversial public figure in the past two months and Bob Casey, without doing much of anything to attract headlines, is the beneficiary," Richards added.

"But this campaign, which has miles to go and millions to spend, is still in early previews."

Casey's biggest gain is among Democrats who went from 74 - 17 percent for the challenger in the February 16 poll to 77 - 10 percent today. He also has gained among men and women voters and slightly among independent voters, who now back him 52 - 28 percent.

Pennsylvania voters give Santorum a 36 - 25 percent favorability with 20 percent mixed and 19 percent who say they don't know enough to form an opinion.

Voters say 44 - 37 percent that Santorum deserves to be reelected, down from 53 - 30 percent February 16. He is too conservative, 25 percent of voters say, with 8 percent who say he is too liberal and 44 percent who say he is "about right."

Casey gets a 40 - 6 percent favorability, with 15 percent mixed and 38 percent who say they don't know enough to form an opinion.

While both Santorum and Casey are pro-life in the abortion debate, 39 percent of Pennsylvania voters say they would be "very likely" or "somewhat likely" to vote for a pro-choice candidate instead.

Voters disapprove 53 - 43 percent of the job President Bush is doing, compared to his all-time low of 55 - 41 percent disapproval May 27, 2004.

Senior Sen. Arlen Specter gets a 53 - 33 percent approval.

From April 13 - 18, Quinnipiac University surveyed 1,395 Pennsylvania voters with a margin of error of +/- 2.6 percentage points.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 69,632
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: April 20, 2005, 09:47:11 AM »

Regional numbers are interesting as well
Logged
falling apart like the ashes of American flags
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 118,056
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: April 20, 2005, 11:00:02 AM »

where is the regional breakdown? I don't see it.

Good news, but 8% think Santorum is too liberal and 5% think he's pro-choice? wow.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 69,632
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: April 20, 2005, 11:05:11 AM »

where is the regional breakdown? I don't see it.


                        Alghny  Philly  NthEst  SthEst  NthWst  SthWst  Central

Casey                   58%     62%     49%     47%     51%     50%     40%
Santorum                25      20      35      38      30      39      46
SMONE ELSE(VOL)          -       4       1       -       -       1       1
WLDN'T VOTE(VOL)         -       1       4       -       3       1       1
DK/NA                   16      13      11      15      15       9      11
Logged
falling apart like the ashes of American flags
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 118,056
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: April 20, 2005, 11:12:22 AM »

I thought Casey would do a lot better in the Northeast, his home turf.

And he has to do better than that in Philadelphia.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 69,632
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: April 20, 2005, 11:17:04 AM »

This is also very interesting:


                        Alghny  Philly  NthEst  SthEst  NthWst  SthWst  Central

Deserves reelection     36%     35%     45%     41%     47%     41%     55%
Does not                57      36      33      38      33      38      28
DK/NA                    8      29      22      20      20      21      16


Note that Santorum was a Congressman for a district in Allegheny County before becoming Senator.
Logged
AuH2O
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,239


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: April 20, 2005, 11:20:56 AM »

Not buying.
Logged
nini2287
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,616


Political Matrix
E: 2.77, S: -3.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: April 20, 2005, 11:22:18 AM »

This is also very interesting:


                        Alghny  Philly  NthEst  SthEst  NthWst  SthWst  Central

Deserves reelection     36%     35%     45%     41%     47%     41%     55%
Does not                57      36      33      38      33      38      28
DK/NA                    8      29      22      20      20      21      16


Note that Santorum was a Congressman for a district in Allegheny County before becoming Senator.

Wow, those Philly numbers are shocking.
Logged
Wakie
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,767


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: April 20, 2005, 12:10:38 PM »

This is also very interesting:


                        Alghny  Philly  NthEst  SthEst  NthWst  SthWst  Central

Deserves reelection     36%     35%     45%     41%     47%     41%     55%
Does not                57      36      33      38      33      38      28
DK/NA                    8      29      22      20      20      21      16


Note that Santorum was a Congressman for a district in Allegheny County before becoming Senator.

1) He is against organized labor.  Unions are HUGE in Pittsburgh.
2) He's got Bush opposing social security.  Allegheny County is the 2nd oldest (per capita) county in the nation (behind only Palm Springs).
3) While he's been in office Santorum hasn't done anything to help his constituents.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: April 20, 2005, 02:35:07 PM »

Yeah this is bad news. His approval ratings also took a hit. He went from 52% approval to 48%. Disapproval still in the 30s.
Logged
Moooooo
nickshepDEM
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,909


Political Matrix
E: -0.52, S: 3.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: April 20, 2005, 04:22:50 PM »
« Edited: April 20, 2005, 04:30:18 PM by nickshepDEM »

14% sounds a tad high.  Its probably closer to a solid 5%.


Side note:  Casey's poll numbers may look good, but his funds are lacking, big time.  Santorum, on the other hand, is raking in the money.

From Morning Call:

Santorum's campaign war chest is 40 times the size of Casey's

"Sen. Rick Santorum raked in nearly $2 million in campaign contributions during the first three months of the year, giving himself a large financial head start over Democrat Bob Casey Jr.

Santorum's haul, combined with money raised earlier, gave him $2.8 million in cash on hand as of March 30.

Casey, who entered the race in early March, raised $90,000 and had just $73,500 in the bank after expenses, according to his financial report."
Logged
Wakie
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,767


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: April 20, 2005, 04:31:45 PM »

Yeah, Santorum is raking in the money from out-of-state donors.  Sorry but I've always had a problem with someone from Texas donating to a Senate campaign in Idaho.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: April 20, 2005, 07:02:58 PM »

Yeah, Santorum is raking in the money from out-of-state donors.  Sorry but I've always had a problem with someone from Texas donating to a Senate campaign in Idaho.

You'll have the same problem with Casey then. He'll be getting a lot of cash from outside PA.
Logged
Rococo4
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,491


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: April 20, 2005, 07:32:38 PM »

still early.....will all depend on if Specter decides to help out Santrorum like he did for him in 2004.  I would not want to be Santorum counting on Specter
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: April 20, 2005, 07:39:40 PM »

still early.....will all depend on if Specter decides to help out Santrorum like he did for him in 2004.  I would not want to be Santorum counting on Specter

Specter is looking out for himself. He won't help Santorum much and even if he does, it won't matter all that much.
Logged
Akno21
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,066
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: April 20, 2005, 07:49:36 PM »

What would Specter do, campaign? He's not exactly going to be Bill Clinton going in there and lighting up the crowd.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: April 20, 2005, 07:50:53 PM »

What would Specter do, campaign? He's not exactly going to be Bill Clinton going in there and lighting up the crowd.

He does help with some voters in the SE but it won't do much.
Logged
Emsworth
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,054


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: April 20, 2005, 08:10:34 PM »

Why isn't Joe Hoeffel running again? He did somewhat better than expected in 2004.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: April 20, 2005, 08:36:08 PM »

Why isn't Joe Hoeffel running again? He did somewhat better than expected in 2004.

No, he was expected to get around 40%. This was his race though. He was supposed to be the nominee until the national Dem leaders got involved and recruited someone that would win.
Logged
Rococo4
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,491


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: April 20, 2005, 10:33:33 PM »

Specter helping is better than not helping.  Him campaiging against Casey could be the difference in what will likely be an extremely tight race.

The fact that is not a presidential election yr should benefit Santorum turnout wise I would think
Logged
TeePee4Prez
Flyers2004
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,479


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: April 21, 2005, 02:41:20 AM »

Why isn't Joe Hoeffel running again? He did somewhat better than expected in 2004.

I'd like Hoeffel to run again, but I guess I'l have to back Casey 100%.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: April 21, 2005, 01:59:51 PM »

Specter helping is better than not helping.  Him campaiging against Casey could be the difference in what will likely be an extremely tight race.

The fact that is not a presidential election yr should benefit Santorum turnout wise I would think

Specter won't do much and wouldn't make much of a difference. Believe me.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: April 21, 2005, 03:45:14 PM »

I'm not sure that, with a 6% disapproval rating, Casey needs anyone to be running with him.

The only thing that confuses me about this poll is that the number of people who don't know enough about Casey to have an opinion has risen since February. That's really weird. He must have really good name recognition to have his "don't know" rating go up after he announced candidacy.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 69,632
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: April 21, 2005, 03:46:42 PM »

It's the surname. They knew that alright...
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.059 seconds with 9 queries.