CO-SUSA: Gardner +2 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 03:18:09 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2014 Gubernatorial Election Polls
  2014 Senatorial Election Polls
  CO-SUSA: Gardner +2 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: CO-SUSA: Gardner +2  (Read 5422 times)
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,942


« on: October 30, 2014, 12:33:27 PM »

It's happening folks!

Seems reasonable. This race may very well have the exact same result as 2010, only it is Gardner who gets the win.

Ummm then it's literally the opposite of the exact same result...
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,942


« Reply #1 on: October 30, 2014, 12:40:09 PM »

Again, like PPP and unlike Rass and Quinnipiac, SUSA has historically been good in CO (though slightly R leaning). This race is a pure toss up.
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,942


« Reply #2 on: October 30, 2014, 02:07:51 PM »

Again, like PPP and unlike Rass and Quinnipiac, SUSA has historically been good in CO (though slightly R leaning). This race is a pure toss up.

Again, this is a PPP/LCV (D) poll, not a PPP non-partisan poll. The true release should come over the weekend.

I wonder if they'll do one.

I honestly don't care much for Colorado polls this late in the game. Mail-in voting changes everything. Almost 60% of the electorate has already voted. That isn't a sample of 500 likely voters. It is 60% of actual voters. Those numbers are much more meaningful than these ostensible exit polls.

I'm not sure what the distinction is? Polls in Oregon and Washington work fine, and they have similar systems.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 15 queries.