MA - UMass(Lowell)l/7 News: Baker (R) 45; Coakley (D) 41
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 28, 2024, 02:08:02 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2014 Gubernatorial Election Polls
  MA - UMass(Lowell)l/7 News: Baker (R) 45; Coakley (D) 41
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: MA - UMass(Lowell)l/7 News: Baker (R) 45; Coakley (D) 41  (Read 2170 times)
Recalcuate
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 444


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: October 28, 2014, 08:32:22 AM »
« edited: October 28, 2014, 08:38:47 AM by Recalcuate »

601 LV. MOE +/- 4.5% Conducted  10/21/14-10/25/14.

Coakley taking only 73% of all Democrats. Baker at 86% of Republicans. 6% other, 8% Undecided.

Link: http://www.uml.edu/docs/TOPLINE-UMass-Lowell-7News-Mass-Gov-Oct-2014_tcm18-155520.pdf
Logged
The Other Castro
Castro2020
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,230
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: October 28, 2014, 10:39:07 AM »

Tilt R
Logged
Rockefeller GOP
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,936
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: October 28, 2014, 11:08:21 AM »

Blue (Red) New England! Tongue
Logged
Free Bird
TheHawk
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,918
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.84, S: -5.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: October 28, 2014, 11:45:29 AM »

Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,876


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: October 28, 2014, 11:46:42 AM »

RIP Coakley, FF.

Hopefully Democrats never try to run a woman here again.
Logged
Attorney General, LGC Speaker, and Former PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,578
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: October 28, 2014, 12:11:07 PM »

All Hail Baker!
Logged
Rockefeller GOP
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,936
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: October 28, 2014, 01:15:50 PM »

RIP Coakley, FF.

Hopefully Democrats never try to run a woman here again.

The only reason MA could elect a Republican is if the voters are sexist against the Democrat?  Even though MA has routinely elected Republicans in the past?  Get a life...
Logged
Dixie Reborn
BeyondTruthAndIdeals
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 817
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: October 28, 2014, 01:34:03 PM »

RIP Coakley, FF.

Hopefully Democrats never try to run a woman here again.
Seriously what the hell is wrong with you? Just because someone doesn't want to vote for a female candidate doesn't make them sexist. By the same logic, anyone who didn't vote for Romney in 2012 is an anti-white racist.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,841
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: October 28, 2014, 01:43:09 PM »

RIP Coakley, FF.

Hopefully Democrats never try to run a woman here again.

The only reason MA could elect a Republican is if the voters are sexist against the Democrat?  Even though MA has routinely elected Republicans in the past?  Get a life...

The Boston machine took forever to back Warren, and sat out instead of backing Coakley in 2010 (and if wormyguy is right, 2014 as well). That seems like an awfully strange coincidence to me. Maybe not the state as a whole, but the old boys club in Boston certainly seems to have a streak of sexism.

Anyway, this actually wasn't as bad as I thought. It's Baker's race to lose, but Coakley isn't sunk yet.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,609
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: October 28, 2014, 01:44:58 PM »

Coakley is a dreadful human being, so why care?
Logged
New_Conservative
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,139
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: October 28, 2014, 02:06:25 PM »

She was a trainwreck in last night's debate, she was a mess.
Logged
Senate Minority Leader Lord Voldemort
Joshua
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,710
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.52, S: -5.91

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: October 28, 2014, 04:15:30 PM »

Logged
ElectionAtlas
Atlas Proginator
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,628
United States


P P P
WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: October 28, 2014, 04:21:58 PM »

New Poll: Massachusetts Governor by UMass Lowell on 2014-10-25

Summary: D: 41%, R: 45%, I: 6%, U: 8%

Poll Source URL: Full Poll Details
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,405
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: October 29, 2014, 12:25:18 AM »

She was a trainwreck in last night's debate, she was a mess.

lol. What happened?
Logged
Roemerista
MQuinn
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 935
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.39, S: 5.91

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: October 29, 2014, 09:13:43 AM »

Well, the train wreck continued...in the debate last night when asked if she would raise fees:
 

Coakely: I don't know, would you raise fees?
Baker: No.
Coakley: Then I won't either.
Logged
Bigby
Mod_Libertarian_GOPer
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,164
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: 3.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: October 29, 2014, 01:28:34 PM »

Well, the train wreck continued...in the debate last night when asked if she would raise fees:
 

Coakely: I don't know, would you raise fees?
Baker: No.
Coakley: Then I won't either.

Sounds about as bad as Romney's habit of starting his rebuttals of Obama with "I agree with the President..." That sends a bad message.
Logged
Ljube
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,987
Political Matrix
E: 2.71, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: October 29, 2014, 03:32:12 PM »

RIP Coakley, FF.

Hopefully Democrats never try to run a woman here again.

Including Hillary?
Logged
New_Conservative
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,139
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: October 29, 2014, 07:55:43 PM »

Well, the train wreck continued...in the debate last night when asked if she would raise fees:
 

Coakely: I don't know, would you raise fees?
Baker: No.
Coakley: Then I won't either.

It really was a nauseating debate in general. Everyone involved (including moderators) performed poorly.  Coakley stood out as the worst of the bunch though, with her constant attempts at jokes (most awkward of them was randomly screaming Jimmy Garropolo during one of Baker's answers, but of codes Baker egged it on by giving her a high-five, I thought he was goin to ask her out for a drink), and of course Coakley blantaly lying about her support of higher taxes, and Baker didn't call her out on it.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.039 seconds with 13 queries.