MA: Coakley (D) internal: Baker (R) +2 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 12:33:22 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2014 Gubernatorial Election Polls
  MA: Coakley (D) internal: Baker (R) +2 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: MA: Coakley (D) internal: Baker (R) +2  (Read 5033 times)
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

« on: October 25, 2014, 12:59:45 PM »

That's alot of undecideds for 10 days out, and I suspect a big chunk of them will come home to Martha on election day.

Like they did for Buono? 

Not really comparable. Christie was a popular incumbent governor with a 65% approval rating. The recent MassINC poll shows both Baker and Coakley are viewed favorably, but Baker moreso. And this also lays credence to the claim that other Dems wouldn't be doing better than Coakley at this point. She's not losing because of horrible favorability scores or something.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

« Reply #1 on: October 25, 2014, 01:30:27 PM »

That's alot of undecideds for 10 days out, and I suspect a big chunk of them will come home to Martha on election day.

Like they did for Buono? 

The undecideds actually did break for Buono, so that's perhaps not the best example you could have used.

Still, if Coakley's campaign is behind by 2 in their own internal poll they're pitching to the press, she's most definitely losing.

Undecideds broke for Coakley in 2010 as well, but it didn't matter because Brown was already over 50.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 13 queries.