MA: Rasmussen: Coakley trails Baker

[You kip if you want to...]

"Coakley" became a verb for 'to lose hilariously' way back in 2010.

[Recalcuate]

This is what happens when you go with a proven loser.

How is Coakley the best the Democrats can do with that deep of a bench of successful candidates in Massachusetts? They deserve to lose the unloseable for simply nominating her.

[Talleyrand]

Hate to say I told you so, Talley...

Unfortunately you're probably correct. Coakley will likely lose at this point.

As for the people complaining that someone else would be doing better, they clearly did not pay attention to her opponents in the primary. Judging by the polling taken during the primary, they would likely be doing even worse. I do not consider Grossman or Berwick better candidates electorally speaking than Coakley.

[Brittain33]

We're going to have a new attorney general this year.

[New_Conservative]

This is what happens when you go with a proven loser.

How is Coakley the best the Democrats can do with that deep of a bench of successful candidates in Massachusetts? They deserve to lose the unloseable for simply nominating her.

Huge Baker supporter saying Grossman would have probably crushed him.

A lot of Grossman Democrats are hesitating on whether or not to vote for Coakley.

[KCDem]

This is what happens when you go with a proven loser.

How is Coakley the best the Democrats can do with that deep of a bench of successful candidates in Massachusetts? They deserve to lose the unloseable for simply nominating her.

Huge Baker supporter saying Grossman would have probably crushed him.

A lot of Grossman Democrats are hesitating on whether or not to vote for Coakley.

Can you provide evidence as to the existence of such sexist pigs?

[ElectionsGuy]

Coakley is the only candidate that could have lost this race, and she's somehow losing it.

[IceSpear]

Grossman and Berwick were doing worse in the polls than Coakley. People tend to forget that despite Patrick's somewhat comfortable win in 2010 (he was held under 50%, remember) that the race was expected to be extremely close. MA has no problem electing Republican governors.

[New_Conservative]

This is what happens when you go with a proven loser.

How is Coakley the best the Democrats can do with that deep of a bench of successful candidates in Massachusetts? They deserve to lose the unloseable for simply nominating her.

Huge Baker supporter saying Grossman would have probably crushed him.

A lot of Grossman Democrats are hesitating on whether or not to vote for Coakley.

Can you provide evidence as to the existence of such sexist pigs?

I can't. I said that based on what people around here have been saying (many Democrats that voted for Grossman). So feel free to take what I said with a grain of salt.

[tpfkaw]

A Boston Globe poll from August had these numbers for Grossman voters in the primary:

[KCDem]

A Boston Globe poll from August had these numbers for Grossman voters in the primary:

Those fake Democrats can leave the state, thank you very much.

[Lief 🐋]

Goddamn it's pretty crazy how sexist Massachusetts voters are. It's a wonder Warren managed to beat Brown at all.

[Maxwell]

Ahahaha I love this!

[New_Conservative]

Goddamn it's pretty crazy how sexist Massachusetts voters are. It's a wonder Warren managed to beat Brown at all.

Wow

Anways, here is an article I saw on Boston's NPR affiliate's website.

http://www.wbur.org/2014/10/14/martha-coakley-democratic-base

You must be logged in to read this quote.

You must be logged in to read this quote.

[Congrats, Griffin!]

Ahahaha I love this!

Seconded

[Maxwell]

Ahahaha I love this!

Agreed

People here are such bad losers. And Coakley can definitely still pull it out. It's a god damn Rassy poll for god sakes.