|           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
July 07, 2020, 05:46:10 pm
News:
If you are having trouble logging in due to invalid user name / pass:

Consider resetting your account password, as you may have forgotten it over time if using a password manager.

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2014 Gubernatorial Election Polls
  2014 Senatorial Election Polls
  SD-Harper: Rounds +4 over Weiland, Weiland +10 over Pressler
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: SD-Harper: Rounds +4 over Weiland, Weiland +10 over Pressler  (Read 1610 times)
JRP1994
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,881


P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: October 13, 2014, 09:51:33 am »

http://harperpolling.com/docs/default-source/default-document-library/hp-14-10-sd-memo.pdf?sfvrsn=0

Rounds: 37%
Weiland: 33%
Pressler: 23%
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,960
Austria


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: October 13, 2014, 10:00:00 am »

Confirms SUSA and PPP's results.

BTW: Is this an internal for Rounds because it says "TO: Interested Parties" ?
Logged
SPC
Chuck Hagel 08
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,008
Latvia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: October 13, 2014, 10:04:16 am »

BTW: Is this an internal for Rounds because it says "TO: Interested Parties" ?

If so, then Pressler is probably doing better than this. In any case, bad news for Rounds.
Logged
The Other Castro
Castro2020
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,070
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: October 13, 2014, 10:44:43 am »

If I was the South Dakota puppetmaster for the Weiland and Pressler campaigns, at this point I would try to best ensure a non-Republican win by getting Pressler to take just enough Rounds votes to let Weiland edge past.
Logged
Dr. RI, Trustbuster
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,410
Vatican City State


Political Matrix
E: -0.39, S: 4.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: October 13, 2014, 10:44:47 am »
« Edited: October 13, 2014, 10:47:17 am by realisticidealist »

BTW: Is this an internal for Rounds because it says "TO: Interested Parties" ?

I don't think so. On Harper's website, they usually post if they did the poll on behalf of someone. They didn't list anyone for this one.
Logged
Trends are real, and I f**king hate it
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,072
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: October 13, 2014, 11:37:42 am »

Go Weiland! Smiley
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 43,588
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: October 13, 2014, 12:07:04 pm »

Fascinating.
Logged
MalaspinaGold
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 990


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: October 13, 2014, 12:11:44 pm »

What would this race look like if SHS or Brendan Johnson had taken the plunge?

Also, did they also do two-way matchups?
Logged
SteveRogers
duncan298
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,030


Political Matrix
E: -3.87, S: -5.04

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: October 13, 2014, 12:38:51 pm »

This definitely confirms that Rounds is in trouble. However, this is exactly what I was afraid of: We're going to get a series of polls showing Weiland and Pressler flipping back and forth for 2nd place. Since neither one is going to drop out, the best chance of beating Rounds is for one of them to cement their position as the clear alternative, causing whoever is viewed as being in third place to start hemorrhaging supporters in the last week of the campaign. As long as both Weiland and Pressler seem viable, they'll keep on splitting the vote right down the middle, and Rounds will probably squeak by.
Logged
From Prussia With Love
jdb
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,192
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: October 13, 2014, 12:48:54 pm »

Harper is a Republican firm; I thought this was well-known.
Logged
MR. CORY BOOKER
olawakandi
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 38,333
Jamaica


Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: October 13, 2014, 01:00:36 pm »
« Edited: October 13, 2014, 01:05:48 pm by OC »

Weiland should win.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,651


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: October 13, 2014, 01:04:00 pm »

Eriland eill kerp us ftom losing senatr.

Post of the Century
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,957
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: October 13, 2014, 01:21:08 pm »

I don't trust Harper. I have a feeling they're showing Weiland doing so well to encourage him not to drop out, and therefore assure Rounds a plurality win. It reminds me of when PPP showed Akin ahead after his legitimate rape comment. I respect PPP, but that poll was clearly garbage designed to encourage Akin to stay in, and soured my views on them for a while.

Regardless, this race is clearly on the board now.  Who would've thought that Kansas and South Dakota could end up saving the Democratic Senate majority?
Logged
MR. CORY BOOKER
olawakandi
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 38,333
Jamaica


Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: October 13, 2014, 01:29:49 pm »

Never underestimate ND and SD electing Dem senators. 2012.
Logged
Joshua
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,549
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.52, S: -5.91

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: October 13, 2014, 02:25:07 pm »

Never underestimate ND and SD electing Dem senators. 2012.

Technically Republicans have only won two senate elections in South Dakota since 1990 and ONE senate election in North Dakota since 1980.
Logged
Torie
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 38,061
Samoa


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: October 13, 2014, 04:29:03 pm »

My hunch is that the Pubs have a materially higher chance of blowing this seat, than the Kansas one. The dynamics are just different. We shall see what the Pub emergency infusion of cash into the race does to the numbers, if anything. Pub money tearing the opponents down, where little has been spent before, has move of a potential delta function, than a billion dollars from the Dems into this race. That is because the Dem leadership is unpopular in the state at the moment - very unpopular.
Logged
○∙◄☻tπ[╪AV┼cV└
jfern
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,479


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: October 13, 2014, 04:32:38 pm »

Never underestimate ND and SD electing Dem senators. 2012.

Technically Republicans have only won two senate elections in South Dakota since 1990 and ONE senate election in North Dakota since 1980.

Technically only one Democrat has ever been elected Senator from Vermont. Technically only one Republican has been elected Senator from Louisiana since reconstruction.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 39.719 seconds with 16 queries.