Would you remove Mohammed from history if you could?

[falling apart like the ashes of American flags]

yes, definately. One less pedophile too.

[phk]

screwing 9 year olds is sick stuff for sure.

[John Dibble]

No, just like I wouldn't remove Hitler. You have no idea what the effects on the timeline would be from removing someone like that - you might even prevent your own birth.

[Bono]

No, becasue then my arab ancestors would have never invaded that read that is ortugal today, and that was at the time teh Visigoth Kingdom, and so I would never been born.

[phk]

No, becasue then my arab ancestors would have never invaded that read that is ortugal today, and that was at the time teh Visigoth Kingdom, and so I would never been born.

Your Middle Eastern too?

[Bono]

No, becasue then my arab ancestors would have never invaded that read that is ortugal today, and that was at the time teh Visigoth Kingdom, and so I would never been born.

Your Middle Eastern too?

*sigh*
NO.
Don't you know the Arabs invaded the Iberian Peninsula?

[JohnFKennedy]

No, just like I wouldn't remove Hitler. You have no idea what the effects on the timeline would be from removing someone like that - you might even prevent your own birth.

^^ Though I wouldn't say Mohammed is comparable to Hitler personally.

[minionofmidas]

Certainly not.

[KEmperor]

No, just like I wouldn't remove Hitler. You have no idea what the effects on the timeline would be from removing someone like that - you might even prevent your own birth.

Exactly what I was going to say.

[phk]

No, becasue then my arab ancestors would have never invaded that read that is ortugal today, and that was at the time teh Visigoth Kingdom, and so I would never been born.

Your Middle Eastern too?

*sigh*
NO.
Don't you know the Arabs invaded the Iberian Peninsula?

Indeed, and Arabs are Middle Easterners.

[phk]

No, just like I wouldn't remove Hitler. You have no idea what the effects on the timeline would be from removing someone like that - you might even prevent your own birth.

^^ Though I wouldn't say Mohammed is comparable to Hitler personally.

Muhammad was a war-mongering idiot who couldn't even add fractions.

[John Dibble]

No, just like I wouldn't remove Hitler. You have no idea what the effects on the timeline would be from removing someone like that - you might even prevent your own birth.

^^ Though I wouldn't say Mohammed is comparable to Hitler personally.

Muhammad was a war-mongering idiot who couldn't even add fractions.

Considering not many people back then could add fractions, that's not saying much. Mathematics and education were not as advanced back then.

[Bono]

No, becasue then my arab ancestors would have never invaded that read that is ortugal today, and that was at the time teh Visigoth Kingdom, and so I would never been born.

Your Middle Eastern too?

*sigh*
NO.
Don't you know the Arabs invaded the Iberian Peninsula?

Indeed, and Arabs are Middle Easterners.

But I was not born in the middle east, and anyways, my arab ancestors got mixed with a lot of other ethnicities since the 10th century.

[John Dibble]

No, becasue then my arab ancestors would have never invaded that read that is ortugal today, and that was at the time teh Visigoth Kingdom, and so I would never been born.

Your Middle Eastern too?

*sigh*
NO.
Don't you know the Arabs invaded the Iberian Peninsula?

Indeed, and Arabs are Middle Easterners.

But I was not born in the middle east, and anyways, my arab ancestors got mixed with a lot of other ethnicities since the 10th century.

Perhaps he's too lazy to look up what the Iberian Peninsula is.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iberian_Peninsula

It's part of Europe, not the Middle East.

[True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)]

Absent the Islamic theocratic empire, we’d have a Byzantine theocratic empire that would right now be waitng for the emperor to appoint a replacement for the recently deceased Joseph III, Partiarch of Constantinople.  Or rather those parts of it that had received word of the Patriarch’s death would be waiting for it. At least by the time the Poles received news of his death, he’d already be buried, so Constantinople would not be overflowing with mourners as Rome is now.

[Hitchabrut]

No, just like I wouldn't remove Hitler. You have no idea what the effects on the timeline would be from removing someone like that - you might even prevent your own birth.

[ian]

No.

[Kevinstat]

I voted yes, but after reading Justice John Dibble's reply and briefly thinking about it I changed my mind.  I have thought about the effect that even much smaller differences in the past can have on today, especially regarding people's existence.

[7,052,770]

without Mohammed, the world would be totally unrecognizable today.  So no, I wouldn't remove him.

[phk]

No, just like I wouldn't remove Hitler. You have no idea what the effects on the timeline would be from removing someone like that - you might even prevent your own birth.

^^ Though I wouldn't say Mohammed is comparable to Hitler personally.

Muhammad was a war-mongering idiot who couldn't even add fractions.

Considering not many people back then could add fractions, that's not saying much. Mathematics and education were not as advanced back then.

Than why give fractions that add up to greater than 1/1 in the Koran for the allocation of inheritance.

Sounds like bullsh**t if he was speaking to God.

[John Dibble]

No, just like I wouldn't remove Hitler. You have no idea what the effects on the timeline would be from removing someone like that - you might even prevent your own birth.

^^ Though I wouldn't say Mohammed is comparable to Hitler personally.

Muhammad was a war-mongering idiot who couldn't even add fractions.

Considering not many people back then could add fractions, that's not saying much. Mathematics and education were not as advanced back then.

Than why give fractions that add up to greater than 1/1 in the Koran for the allocation of inheritance.

Sounds like bullsh**t if he was speaking to God.

And that contradicts my point how?

[phk]

No, just like I wouldn't remove Hitler. You have no idea what the effects on the timeline would be from removing someone like that - you might even prevent your own birth.

^^ Though I wouldn't say Mohammed is comparable to Hitler personally.

Muhammad was a war-mongering idiot who couldn't even add fractions.

Considering not many people back then could add fractions, that's not saying much. Mathematics and education were not as advanced back then.

Than why give fractions that add up to greater than 1/1 in the Koran for the allocation of inheritance.

Sounds like bullsh**t if he was speaking to God.

And that contradicts my point how?

Shouldn't something divinely inspired by God have at least correct math?

[KEmperor]

No, just like I wouldn't remove Hitler. You have no idea what the effects on the timeline would be from removing someone like that - you might even prevent your own birth.

^^ Though I wouldn't say Mohammed is comparable to Hitler personally.

Muhammad was a war-mongering idiot who couldn't even add fractions.

Considering not many people back then could add fractions, that's not saying much. Mathematics and education were not as advanced back then.

Than why give fractions that add up to greater than 1/1 in the Koran for the allocation of inheritance.

Sounds like bullsh**t if he was speaking to God.

And that contradicts my point how?

Shouldn't something divinely inspired by God have at least correct math?

If you are going to use that argument, you should also mention Pi=3 in the Jewish/Christian bible.

[phk]

No, just like I wouldn't remove Hitler. You have no idea what the effects on the timeline would be from removing someone like that - you might even prevent your own birth.

^^ Though I wouldn't say Mohammed is comparable to Hitler personally.

Muhammad was a war-mongering idiot who couldn't even add fractions.

Considering not many people back then could add fractions, that's not saying much. Mathematics and education were not as advanced back then.

Than why give fractions that add up to greater than 1/1 in the Koran for the allocation of inheritance.

Sounds like bullsh**t if he was speaking to God.

And that contradicts my point how?

Shouldn't something divinely inspired by God have at least correct math?

If you are going to use that argument, you should also mention Pi=3 in the Jewish/Christian bible.

Uh, I don't care about Jews and Christians.

[John Dibble]

No, just like I wouldn't remove Hitler. You have no idea what the effects on the timeline would be from removing someone like that - you might even prevent your own birth.

^^ Though I wouldn't say Mohammed is comparable to Hitler personally.

Muhammad was a war-mongering idiot who couldn't even add fractions.

Considering not many people back then could add fractions, that's not saying much. Mathematics and education were not as advanced back then.

Than why give fractions that add up to greater than 1/1 in the Koran for the allocation of inheritance.

Sounds like bullsh**t if he was speaking to God.

And that contradicts my point how?

Shouldn't something divinely inspired by God have at least correct math?

That still doesn't contradict my point about knowledge of mathematics being crappy back then. I never said he was a legitamite prophet - I think all the religions on Earth are probably wrong, atheism included.