PPP (D) for MoveOn.org (D): Warner leads in VA, tied race in KY

[Tender Branson]

VA: 49-35 Warner/Gillespie

http://de.scribd.com/doc/216793874/Virginia-Medicaid-Polling-Results

KY: 45-44 Grimes/McConnell

http://de.scribd.com/doc/216793719/Kentucky-Medicaid-Polling-Results

[windjammer]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Strange! Maybe because she's extremely pretty?

[Lief 🗽]

Dominating.

[Potatoe]

But..........BUT...........#GILLMENTUM?

More seriously, this is great news especially with Grimes in the lead.

[Bandit3 the Worker]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Strange! Maybe because she's extremely pretty?

The breakdowns in this poll were weird again, especially the age breakdown.

On the other hand, I think this was just a poll of likely voters. If everyone actually voted, things could improve considerably.

[Oldiesfreak1854]

For MoveOn.org?  So much for PPP being a "good" and "unbiased" pollster.

[free my dawg]

^^^^^

[7,052,770]

For MoveOn.org?  So much for PPP being a "good" and "unbiased" pollster.

Why wouldn't you judge them by actual studies of pollster bias, rather than "OMG one time they did something for moveon!!!!!1" ?

[Chancellor Tanterterg]

For MoveOn.org?  So much for PPP being a "good" and "unbiased" pollster.

Why wouldn't you judge them by actual studies of pollster bias, rather than "OMG one time they did something for moveon!!!!!1" ?

Because then he'd have to acknowledge that they are an excellent polling firm, thus defeating the whole purpose of ignoring inconvenient facts about PPP's strong track record.

[Maxwell]

For MoveOn.org?  So much for PPP being a "good" and "unbiased" pollster.

Why wouldn't you judge them by actual studies of pollster bias, rather than "OMG one time they did something for moveon!!!!!1" ?

Because then he'd have to use his brain, and that's hard because he doesn't have one.

[LeBron]

For MoveOn.org?  So much for PPP being a "good" and "unbiased" pollster.

Why wouldn't you judge them by actual studies of pollster bias, rather than "OMG one time they did something for moveon!!!!!1" ?

Because then he'd have to use his brain, and that's hard because he doesn't have one.

.....Was that really necessary? Oldies obsession with PPP being a terrible pollster gets annoying, but that's an outright insult and I recommend you apologize to him.

And considering the Gov polls by MoveOn were a few points off, McConnell is probably up by about 1-2 points, but still very much in trouble. As for Warner, he's polling below 50 against the underdog and sensational Gillespie, so it's undoubtedly a tossup! Can't be anything else!

[Maxwell]

For MoveOn.org?  So much for PPP being a "good" and "unbiased" pollster.

Why wouldn't you judge them by actual studies of pollster bias, rather than "OMG one time they did something for moveon!!!!!1" ?

Because then he'd have to use his brain, and that's hard because he doesn't have one.

.....Was that really necessary? Oldies obsession with PPP being a terrible pollster gets annoying, but that's an outright insult and I recommend you apologize to him.

And considering the Gov polls by MoveOn were a few points off, McConnell is probably up by about 1-2 points, but still very much in trouble. As for Warner, he's polling below 50 against the underdog and sensational Gillespie, so it's undoubtedly a tossup! Can't be anything else!

I'd apologize if Oldies got a clue and actually showed any critical thought, which he has not done.

[Fmr President & Senator Polnut]

For MoveOn.org?  So much for PPP being a "good" and "unbiased" pollster.

Why wouldn't you judge them by actual studies of pollster bias, rather than "OMG one time they did something for moveon!!!!!1" ?

Because then he'd have to use his brain, and that's hard because he doesn't have one.

.....Was that really necessary? Oldies obsession with PPP being a terrible pollster gets annoying, but that's an outright insult and I recommend you apologize to him.

And considering the Gov polls by MoveOn were a few points off, McConnell is probably up by about 1-2 points, but still very much in trouble. As for Warner, he's polling below 50 against the underdog and sensational Gillespie, so it's undoubtedly a tossup! Can't be anything else!

Are you being serious.... don't be such a wuss.

On topic, I have serious issues with PPP's national polls (I think with good reason) but their state-level polls are among the best.