Roe v. Wade

[Emsworth]

I think a good way to look at that concept would be to ask outside of having a law on the books just to make a point, how would you be able to enforce such a law without violating the constitution. Could you be able to enforce a law like this without searching without a warrant? Could you be able to substantiate all the elements of the crime you claim to beyond a reasonable doubt...

It is, perhaps, impossible to perfectly enforce any law, with or without violating the Constitution. However, it is clear that an anti-abortion law can be at least partially enforced without violating the Constitution. For instance, one could only prosecute when a woman confesses to performing an abortion.

[Person Man]

Yes, but how can one get a confession. That sounds kinda shady. Also, are you really going to prosecute women? I don't think there has ever been a pro-life law like that in our country, at least the Texas law that was struck down allowed women to perform abortions on themselves. Although I see where you are going. I believe that a "don't ask, don't tell" law could be constitutional and a good middle ground if Roe was overturned.

[Kaine for Senate '18]

Pro Choice/Anti Roe.

The decision was poorly written, and legally unsound.  The opinion would have been much better off in the hands of a justice like Brennan; Blackmun was a capable justice, he was not strong enough at that stage in his career to craft a strong opinion.