SENATE BILL: Pacific Deconstruction Resolution (Passed)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 06:41:11 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  SENATE BILL: Pacific Deconstruction Resolution (Passed)
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3
Author Topic: SENATE BILL: Pacific Deconstruction Resolution (Passed)  (Read 2564 times)
Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
Moderator
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 54,118
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: January 20, 2014, 03:01:59 AM »
« edited: February 04, 2014, 07:45:56 PM by Senator North Carolina Yankee »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.


Sponsor: TyriontheImperialist
Logged
Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
Moderator
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 54,118
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: January 20, 2014, 03:02:58 AM »

The sponsor has 24 hours to begin advocating for this.
Logged
President Tyrion
TyrionTheImperialist
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,787


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: January 20, 2014, 04:31:12 AM »

Oops, I totally intended to go back and edit this. The constitution requires the consent of the regions and Senate for regional borders to be changed, which is why we're discussing this.

At first, my thought was to just take all the continental states and give them to the Midwest, while leaving Alaska, Hawaii, and Oceania to comprise the new Pacific, which can later dissolve (or remain a personal fiefdom without Senatorial representation) without really affecting the game dynamic.

However, just leaving those non-continental territories off seems like it would be a pretty aesthetically unpleasing move, so I'm going to make an amendment.

Quote from: Restricted
You must be logged in to read this quote.

The Pacific and Midwest are the two regions most in support of consolidation in the first place, so I figure this is worthy of discussion.
Logged
Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
Moderator
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 54,118
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: January 20, 2014, 04:34:10 AM »

How would the Senate balance be preserved? Either we go down to eight total members, up to sixteen total members or revive the Duke Plan's bicameralism.
Logged
tmthforu94
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,402
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.26, S: -4.52

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: January 20, 2014, 01:42:12 PM »

As a proud Midwesterner, I can't support this invasion of our region. I would support just giving us New Mexico, though.
Logged
Fmr. Pres. Duke
AHDuke99
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,172


Political Matrix
E: -1.94, S: -3.13

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: January 20, 2014, 01:46:40 PM »

We could discuss this, but at this point, seeing as how difficult passing any sort of consolidation has proven to be, I am more favorable to giving the Pacific a chance to succeed after passing their stimulus bill before talking of consolidation again.

If we did go this route, we may want to look at changing the game's structure again. We would have to reduce the senate and maybe explore some of the proposals I made in the October election once again.
Logged
PJ
Politics Junkie
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,795
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: January 20, 2014, 07:07:02 PM »

As a proud Midwesterner, I can't support this invasion of our region. I would support just giving us New Mexico, though.
Roll Eyes Yeah, because taking away land from the smallest region is totally the answer to activity issues.
Logged
Talleyrand
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,523


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: January 20, 2014, 07:14:18 PM »

Would this precipitate a situation where we'd have two regions, two Senators, and 1 regional government?
Logged
President Tyrion
TyrionTheImperialist
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,787


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: January 20, 2014, 07:29:07 PM »

Would this precipitate a situation where we'd have two regions, two Senators, and 1 regional government?

It's possible, but we'd need to pass an amendment allowing that to be the case.
Logged
Fritz
JLD
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,668
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: January 20, 2014, 08:04:45 PM »

Would this precipitate a situation where we'd have two regions, two Senators, and 1 regional government?

It's possible, but we'd need to pass an amendment allowing that to be the case.

I don't think it would.  In fact, I don't think the senate even needs to be involved for this scenario.  The 2 regions would agree to combine their regional governments, and remain separate for senate representation.  Simple.  Smiley

I would be in favor of such a plan (in fact I proposed it once, a few years back.)
Logged
PJ
Politics Junkie
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,795
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: January 20, 2014, 08:06:02 PM »

Would this precipitate a situation where we'd have two regions, two Senators, and 1 regional government?

It's possible, but we'd need to pass an amendment allowing that to be the case.

I don't think it would.  In fact, I don't think the senate even needs to be involved for this scenario.  The 2 regions would agree to combine their regional governments, and remain separate for senate representation.  Simple.  Smiley

I would be in favor of such a plan (in fact I proposed it once, a few years back.)
Would you care to elaborate on how exactly this combination would work?
Logged
Fritz
JLD
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,668
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: January 20, 2014, 08:07:28 PM »

I don't know what needs elaborating- do you have a specific question?
Logged
PJ
Politics Junkie
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,795
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: January 20, 2014, 08:09:00 PM »

I don't know what needs elaborating- do you have a specific question?
Never mind, I just got it. Would the RG still treat the regions as separate?
Logged
Fritz
JLD
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,668
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: January 20, 2014, 08:11:10 PM »

I don't know what needs elaborating- do you have a specific question?
Never mind, I just got it. Would the RG still treat the regions as separate?

Yes.
Logged
PJ
Politics Junkie
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,795
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: January 20, 2014, 08:12:24 PM »

I don't know what needs elaborating- do you have a specific question?
Never mind, I just got it. Would the RG still treat the regions as separate?

Yes.
Okay, I think this is something I could support.
Logged
President Tyrion
TyrionTheImperialist
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,787


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: January 20, 2014, 08:21:12 PM »

Well, regions are established for both governmental and electoral purposes. I don't know that I agree with Fritz's interpretation, but allow me a moment to collect my thoughts on the matter.
Logged
Fritz
JLD
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,668
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: January 20, 2014, 08:29:12 PM »

Taking a quick look at the Constitution:

Quote from: Restricted
You must be logged in to read this quote.

So I was wrong- the senate must consent to this first.
Logged
President Tyrion
TyrionTheImperialist
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,787


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: January 20, 2014, 08:41:03 PM »

Well, any such plan, as Fritz pointed out, requires Senatorial consent, so I suggest we give it, on the condition that the regions actually want it Tongue
Logged
Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
Moderator
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 54,118
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: January 21, 2014, 07:24:46 PM »

How tdoes the check need to change, if any, to supply the appopriate "consent"?
Logged
President Tyrion
TyrionTheImperialist
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,787


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: January 22, 2014, 06:43:36 PM »
« Edited: January 22, 2014, 07:54:02 PM by Senator Tyrion »

Quote from: Restricted
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Does this work?
Logged
Talleyrand
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,523


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: January 22, 2014, 07:43:24 PM »

That seems to work, and it meets the constitutional requirement that regions have to provide consent for their boundaries to be "altered", even if this is not exactly what is happening in that case. A "two region, 1 government" solution seems fine to me.
Logged
President Tyrion
TyrionTheImperialist
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,787


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: January 22, 2014, 07:49:06 PM »

That seems to work, and it meets the constitutional requirement that regions have to provide consent for their boundaries to be "altered", even if this is not exactly what is happening in that case. A "two region, 1 government" solution seems fine to me.

Yeah, regardless, the regions must provide consent.
Logged
Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
Moderator
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 54,118
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: January 23, 2014, 03:25:55 AM »

Quote from: Restricted
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Sponsor Feedback: Origination
Status: Senators have 24 hours to object.
Logged
GAworth
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,755
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: January 23, 2014, 10:16:22 PM »

Is there a way to include language about it must be approved by a referendum of the two regions, if a majority of citizens in one region object, then the union will not go through.
Logged
President Tyrion
TyrionTheImperialist
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,787


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: January 23, 2014, 10:49:12 PM »

Is there a way to include language about it must be approved by a referendum of the two regions, if a majority of citizens in one region object, then the union will not go through.

Presumably, the regions can approve it however they want. The Senate I think should not interfere because this is a process explicitly left to the regions once we give consent.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.045 seconds with 12 queries.