"Lean" Democratic states

[I Will Not Be Wrong]

Nah, New Hampshire, Iowa, and Pennsylvania are the "lean" Democratic states in my opinion. Perhaps Virginia too.

[I Will Not Be Wrong]

Nice argument on Virginia, but if Iowa is a tossup state, then PA is also.
Nevada is going to be hard for Republicans, unless we start really focusing on the latino vote. I think the minority vote is 48% in Nevada.

[I Will Not Be Wrong]

Anyway, here are what I think will be the big nine states of 2016:
New Hampshire
Pennsylvania (especially if Christie is GOP nominee)
Ohio
Wisconsin (especially if Walker is GOP nominee)
Iowa
Virginia
Florida
Colorado
And in a GOP blowout:
Minnesota
Note that nine states went from Republican to Democratic from 2004 to 2008

[I Will Not Be Wrong]

Some states like Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin or even Minnesota have long since been considered toss-ups or "lean Democratic" by the media / polling agencies before a presidential election. After election night, however, the rude awakening comes. Every time.
Why do some people not accept that those states are ineradicably Democratic?
And are there any counterparts on the Republican side?

Because they're only slightly more Democratic than the national average, and Democratic hacks think that winning or having close losses in the last few elections indicates a pro-Democratic national average, rather than just small sample sizes. It would be like someone saying before 1992 that Illinois was solidly Republican, because it hadn't gone Democratic since 1964. In reality, it had a Democratic lean overall for those elections, and predictably it went Democratic when a Democrat won in 1992.

Right! Winning the U.S. Popular Vote only once in the last six election cycles means the Republicans have the advantage in presidential elections.

The type of answer Nichlemn just gave answers for excelsus why, if anyone from this thread is trying to be a hack, it's Nichlemn.

I posted a number of months ago the status of the two parties' states nowadays with the electoral map, and Nichlemn bitched up a storm that I had the nerve to say that, because Pennsylvania has had a Democratic tilt since after the 1940s and that Indiana did flip and carry Democratic in 2008, it was Indiana going Democratic before Pennsylvania would go Republican. Oh, no! We're supposed to be swayed that Pennsylvania will be going Republican because it was less than a full two points above the national margin with the re-election of Barack Obama in 2012 while that was also the case with the re-election of Bill Clinton in 1996.

Emotionally wound up Republican forum posters like Nichlemn would prefer to ignore numerous electoral histories, acknowledge whatever is figured to be a fine example here or there and which suits one's narrative, and then continue to double down on one's messaging that the Republicans are still kicking electoral ass in this period just as they had with the previous one and two generations ago.

We're in a new era, Nichelmn, where it's not the Republicans but the Democrats with overwhelming electoral-map advantage. No amount of your efforts to attempt to say otherwise will persuade those who respect facts to believe you.

This guy isn't for real, right?