Opposite Party Presidential Candidates You'd Consider Voting For

[Orser67]

Which of these candidates of the opposite party could you plausibly see yourself voting for?

[IceSpear]

Out of this list, only Huntsman. I've voted for Charlie Dent in the past and would consider voting for a Republican like Murkowski or Snowe.

[H. Ross Peron]

None although I might find Christie tolerable.

[Atlas Has Shrugged]

Biden, Schweitzer, and Gillibrand.

[FEMA Camp Administrator]

Only voted Biden. That said, I can see myself going for Schweitzer or Cuomo should the Republicans happen to strangely disappear or they nominate Bernie Sanders in an upset.

[Napoleon]

Christie has more personality than O'Malley, but I just wouldn't vote for a Republican

[Orser67]

I'm somewhere between "I'd never vote for a Republican in any national race" and "I could see myself voting for maybe Christie and Huntsman if I really didn't like the Democrat." If either pledged to nominate relatively moderate judges (i.e. no one much to the right of Anthony Kennedy), I could consider voting for them.

[Del Tachi]

I'd vote for Biden, Clinton, or Warner over some Tea Party Republicans.

[Warren 4 Secretary of Everything]

Rand Paul because he is the sperm of Ron Paul.

[Brewer]

Jon Huntsman

[Person Man]

I'd vote for Condi. A neo-con is better than just bloodthirsty hawk  and, rumor has it,  she's socially moderate. Basically she is the female version of Rudy. Maybe Scott Walker, but he seems to be a douche. I thought about Chris Christie, but he just seems more and more like a cheap Reagan clone than anything we have seen in years, even more so than Romney or W.

[Donerail]

Huntsman, Paul, Brown, Portman.

[Napoleon]

If Alan Keyes runs, I will consider him.

[LeBron]

The only Republican I would vote for in 2016 is Rand Paul, but I would probably only do that in the case that the Democratic nominee is a DINO like Manchin or Schweitzer. Not to say that I don't like Senator Paul because he's a great politician, but I would stay loyal to the Democratic Party as long as they stayed loyal to their voters with quality, liberal candidates.

I would consider Susana Martinez as well, but since the best shot she has is being named as VP, it would have to be a no then.

The others mainly Cruz, Christie, Perry, Santorum, Kasich, Portman, Jindal, and the other Republican potentials are hell no's.

[NewYorkExpress]

Condi, Christie Huntsman, Hagel (he hasn't actually switched parties has he?) and Sandoval

[Goldwater]

Clinton, Schweitzer, and Cuomo.

[Maxwell]

Dean, Schweitzer, and Cuomo.

[CatoMinor]

Dean, Schweitzer, and Cuomo.

[morgieb]

I could at least consider Huntsman or Christie.

[Pessimistic Antineutrino]

If the Republican is inexcusably (Akin-level, beyond even Cruz and Santorum) bad, I might consider Dean or Warner.

[Mr. Illini]

I am confident to say that I would vote for Huntsman over almost any potential Democrat. Would consider Christie against a bad Democrat. Maybe Paul Ryan. If Rand Paul were more like his dad I would, but unfortunately he is way too conservative right now. Need a little more libertarianism to consider.

[Flake]

Jon Huntsman, Chris Christie, Susana Martinez, and Portman.

[badgate]

Huntsman as an Independent, and I'm a Democrat and Wouldn't Vote For A Republican

[Lief 🗽]

Any Republican President will just be a rubber stamp for whatever right-wing legislation their teabag congress passes. I wouldn't vote for any of them.

[Horus]

Christie, Huntsman, Paul, Portman