The OFFICIAL 2013 Election Results Thread
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 28, 2024, 07:56:03 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Gubernatorial/State Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  The OFFICIAL 2013 Election Results Thread
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 21 22 23 24 25 [26] 27
Author Topic: The OFFICIAL 2013 Election Results Thread  (Read 46994 times)
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,107
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #625 on: November 12, 2013, 11:05:25 PM »

The Fairfax County provisionals went 160-103 Herring.   So the final tally going into the recount should be Herring +163.

Cry
Logged
johnbuterbaugh
Rookie
**
Posts: 47
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #626 on: November 12, 2013, 11:14:26 PM »

njelections.org just released the U.S. Senate special election results by municipality.

Also this:
Logged
Miles
MilesC56
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,324
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #627 on: November 13, 2013, 01:21:13 AM »

Tulsa by precinct:

Logged
smoltchanov
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,376
Russian Federation


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #628 on: November 13, 2013, 02:36:01 AM »

Miles, what will you say about Arkansas SD-21 election? I know that Republican nominee is very much a "tea party man" (big minus from my personal view, but, probably, not too much from NE Arkansas people view) and that, contrary to the norm, more people voted in Republican primary then in Democratic. What about Democratic nominee (Rockwell)? A Democrat must be of rather conservative type (IMHO) to have a chance there.
Logged
Miles
MilesC56
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,324
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #629 on: November 13, 2013, 05:48:57 AM »

Miles, what will you say about Arkansas SD-21 election? I know that Republican nominee is very much a "tea party man" (big minus from my personal view, but, probably, not too much from NE Arkansas people view) and that, contrary to the norm, more people voted in Republican primary then in Democratic. What about Democratic nominee (Rockwell)? A Democrat must be of rather conservative type (IMHO) to have a chance there.

Wow, the runoff was super close. Rockwell won by 24 votes and Cooper won by 67 votes.

Rockwell strikes me as a type of business-oriented Democrat that could win here.

This is one of those areas that hasn't had Republican local representation since Reconstruction...I hate to see these seats flip.
Logged
cinyc
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,721


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #630 on: November 13, 2013, 03:06:35 PM »

Presumably final update from the Virginia State Board of Elections' Website before the recount:

Obenshain   1,103,613   49.88%   
Herring   1,103,777   49.89%   
Write-in   4,926   0.22%   
Total Votes   2,212,316

Herring +164
Logged
🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸
shua
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,663
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 1.29, S: -0.70

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #631 on: November 14, 2013, 01:01:25 PM »

The caucuses for the special election in Lt Gov-elect Ralph Northam's 6th district will be on Nov 16 for the Democrats and Nov 21 for the Republicans. Any voter in the district will be allowed to vote in either - or both!
Logged
Miles
MilesC56
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,324
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #632 on: November 14, 2013, 01:10:11 PM »

The caucuses for the special election in Lt Gov-elect Ralph Northam's 6th district will be on Nov 16 for the Democrats and Nov 21 for the Republicans. Any voter in the district will be allowed to vote in either - or both!

Democrats have three candidates
Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

I personally like McClellan the most.
Logged
Miles
MilesC56
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,324
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #633 on: November 14, 2013, 05:47:06 PM »

Turnout for the Gov. race 2009 vs. 2013

Logged
Skill and Chance
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,521
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #634 on: November 14, 2013, 06:47:19 PM »

The caucuses for the special election in Lt Gov-elect Ralph Northam's 6th district will be on Nov 16 for the Democrats and Nov 21 for the Republicans. Any voter in the district will be allowed to vote in either - or both!

Democrats have three candidates
Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

I personally like McClellan the most.

Hey Miles, I have one more request for you.  In light of the upcoming special elections, could you do McAuliffe/Cuccinelli numbers for SD-06 (Northam), SD-33 (Herring) and just in case, SD-26 (Obenshain)?
Logged
JacobNC
psychicpanda
Rookie
**
Posts: 175
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #635 on: November 14, 2013, 06:56:07 PM »

Miles!  I almost didn't recognize you.  When did you become a Republican?!
Logged
Miles
MilesC56
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,324
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #636 on: November 14, 2013, 07:10:34 PM »

Miles!  I almost didn't recognize you.  When did you become a Republican?!

Could you tell it was me by my signature? Wink

Its a Forum Community thing. Its not permanent; some of us are showing solidarity with the Mods.
Logged
Miles
MilesC56
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,324
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #637 on: November 14, 2013, 07:59:22 PM »


Hey Miles, I have one more request for you.  In light of the upcoming special elections, could you do McAuliffe/Cuccinelli numbers for SD-06 (Northam), SD-33 (Herring) and just in case, SD-26 (Obenshain)?

McAuliffe-Cuccinelli-Sarvis

SD06: 52-41-7
SD26: 35-59-6
SD33: 55-39-6

Calculations.
Logged
Hatman 🍁
EarlAW
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,977
Canada


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #638 on: November 14, 2013, 08:36:46 PM »

62% of the results in for Tulsa Mayor, and the results are strong for the incumbent mayor and bad for the Oklahoma Democrats next big hope:

Mayor Dewey Bartlett (R): 57%
Former Mayor Kathy Taylor (D): 43%

This is inspite of the endorsement of the city's biggest newspaper for Taylor, a former Republican city councilor for Taylor, and Taylor being able to spend over $3 Million in this mayors race. The race to look at more closely is the City Auditor race, where Dewey Bartlett's appointee may go down.


$3 million??? For a city of what, 1 million? Where the turnout will probably be what, 20%?
Logged
PulaskiSkywayDriver
Rookie
**
Posts: 111


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #639 on: November 15, 2013, 12:00:36 AM »

Here is the Hudson Data. Notice the MASSIVE swing in Union City because of the Stack machine help but also the huge swing in Hoboken which seems to be trending Republican at the top of the ticket with the exception of the Booker-Lonegan race. The Harrison mayoral endorsement made for a mini Union City in that town. The smaller swing toward Christie in Bayonne and Kearny (only two below trend) is interesting.


Hudson County Data for Gov Race (W/o Provisionals)
Town     Buo  Chr   Total        Margin       Swing       Trend (Vs. State)
Bayonne 5262   5302   10564   0.38%   15.94%   -2.86%
East Newark 145   75   220   -31.82%   19.44%   0.64%
Guttenberg 732   638   1370   -6.86%   41.88%   23.08%
Harrison 755   893   1648   8.37%   53.63%   34.83%
Hoboken 5467   6439   11906   8.16%   42.18%   23.38%
Jersey City 20225   9709   29934   -35.13%   23.39%   4.59%
Kearny 2655   2624   5279   -0.59%   14.35%   -4.45%
North Bergen 6764   4278   11042   -22.51%   30.27%   11.47%
Secaucus 1723   2207   3930   12.32%   28.39%   9.59%
Union City 4624   6604   11228   17.63%   75.18%   56.38%
Weehawken 1395   1065   2460   -13.41%   32.00%   13.20%
WNY 3168   2403   5571   -13.73%   32.93%   14.13%
Logged
🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸
shua
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,663
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 1.29, S: -0.70

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #640 on: November 15, 2013, 12:13:13 AM »

Turnout for the Gov. race 2009 vs. 2013



I'm surprised there were so many places with greatly increased turnout.  People did not like these candidates.
Logged
Small Business Owner of Any Repute
Mr. Moderate
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,431
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #641 on: November 15, 2013, 12:18:42 AM »

Here is the Hudson Data. Notice the MASSIVE swing in Union City because of the Stack machine help but also the huge swing in Hoboken which seems to be trending Republican at the top of the ticket with the exception of the Booker-Lonegan race. The Harrison mayoral endorsement made for a mini Union City in that town. The smaller swing toward Christie in Bayonne and Kearny (only two below trend) is interesting.


Hudson County Data for Gov Race (W/o Provisionals)
Town     Buo  Chr   Total        Margin       Swing       Trend (Vs. State)
Bayonne 5262   5302   10564   0.38%   15.94%   -2.86%
East Newark 145   75   220   -31.82%   19.44%   0.64%
Guttenberg 732   638   1370   -6.86%   41.88%   23.08%
Harrison 755   893   1648   8.37%   53.63%   34.83%
Hoboken 5467   6439   11906   8.16%   42.18%   23.38%
Jersey City 20225   9709   29934   -35.13%   23.39%   4.59%
Kearny 2655   2624   5279   -0.59%   14.35%   -4.45%
North Bergen 6764   4278   11042   -22.51%   30.27%   11.47%
Secaucus 1723   2207   3930   12.32%   28.39%   9.59%
Union City 4624   6604   11228   17.63%   75.18%   56.38%
Weehawken 1395   1065   2460   -13.41%   32.00%   13.20%
WNY 3168   2403   5571   -13.73%   32.93%   14.13%

Naturally, the areas of Hudson where Christie did best are those with the most middle class and affluent white voters (Hoboken). Union City is especially interesting because it's 84.7% Hispanic. There's a huge concentration of Cuban voters there that haven't voted Republican since 1985.
Logged
DINGO Joe
dingojoe
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,700
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #642 on: November 15, 2013, 01:07:46 AM »

Turnout for the Gov. race 2009 vs. 2013



I'm surprised there were so many places with greatly increased turnout.  People did not like these candidates.

Part of the change in turnout was population gain or loss.  Plus, it was a more competitive campaign.
Logged
Miles
MilesC56
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,324
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #643 on: November 17, 2013, 12:24:30 AM »

The turnout maps looks a lot like the swing map to me:



I know I happened to use red for more votes, but still.
Logged
johnbuterbaugh
Rookie
**
Posts: 47
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #644 on: November 18, 2013, 03:31:29 PM »

The population decrease and Creigh Deeds of Bath County not being a candidate resulted in fewer voters in Bath, Highland, and Allegany Counties. Southwest Virginia is experiencing population decline and, as a result, fewer voters. Loudoun and Prince William Counties are seeing significant population increase, and significantly more voters turned out as a result.
Logged
Flake
JacobTiver
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,688
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #645 on: November 19, 2013, 10:16:50 PM »

There is a vote right now in Albuquerque trying to restrict women's access to abortions.

No election day votes have been counted yet, but so far:

Absentee Voting:

For: 4,046
Against: 2,273
Total: 6,319

For: 69.73%
Against: 30.27%


Early Voting:
For: 18,078
Against: 25,719

Total: 43,797

For: 41.28%
Against: 58.72%


Total vote:

For: 44.15%
Against: 55.85%


Note: The election day vote is still not available.
Logged
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,107
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #646 on: November 19, 2013, 10:21:20 PM »

There is a vote right now in Albuquerque trying to restrict women's access to abortions.

No election day votes have been counted yet, but so far:

Absentee Voting:

For: 4,046
Against: 2,273
Total: 6,319

For: 69.73%
Against: 30.27%


Early Voting:
For: 18,078
Against: 25,719

Total: 43,797

For: 41.28%
Against: 58.72%


Total vote:

For: 44.15%
Against: 55.85%


Note: The election day vote is still not available.

This will probably go down in flames.
Logged
Flake
JacobTiver
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,688
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #647 on: November 19, 2013, 10:26:19 PM »

There is a vote right now in Albuquerque trying to restrict women's access to abortions.

No election day votes have been counted yet, but so far:

Absentee Voting:

For: 4,046
Against: 2,273
Total: 6,319

For: 69.73%
Against: 30.27%


Early Voting:
For: 18,078
Against: 25,719

Total: 43,797

For: 41.28%
Against: 58.72%


Total vote:

For: 44.15%
Against: 55.85%


Note: The election day vote is still not available.

This will probably go down in flames.

I hope so.
Logged
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,107
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #648 on: November 19, 2013, 10:39:25 PM »

There is a vote right now in Albuquerque trying to restrict women's access to abortions.

No election day votes have been counted yet, but so far:

Absentee Voting:

For: 4,046
Against: 2,273
Total: 6,319

For: 69.73%
Against: 30.27%


Early Voting:
For: 18,078
Against: 25,719

Total: 43,797

For: 41.28%
Against: 58.72%


Total vote:

For: 44.15%
Against: 55.85%


Note: The election day vote is still not available.

This will probably go down in flames.

I hope so.

Is this a local ballot initiative? If so, the republicans must control the municipality (which seems highly unlikely), otherwise, why would democrats put up a vote like this?
Logged
publicunofficial
angryGreatness
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,010
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #649 on: November 19, 2013, 10:48:36 PM »

There is a vote right now in Albuquerque trying to restrict women's access to abortions.

No election day votes have been counted yet, but so far:

Absentee Voting:

For: 4,046
Against: 2,273
Total: 6,319

For: 69.73%
Against: 30.27%


Early Voting:
For: 18,078
Against: 25,719

Total: 43,797

For: 41.28%
Against: 58.72%


Total vote:

For: 44.15%
Against: 55.85%


Note: The election day vote is still not available.

This will probably go down in flames.

I hope so.

Is this a local ballot initiative? If so, the republicans must control the municipality (which seems highly unlikely), otherwise, why would democrats put up a vote like this?

It's a citizen's referendum
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 21 22 23 24 25 [26] 27  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.057 seconds with 12 queries.