A couple of questions about Neo-Conservatism
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 24, 2024, 08:27:33 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  A couple of questions about Neo-Conservatism
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: A couple of questions about Neo-Conservatism  (Read 319 times)
DevotedDemocrat
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 442
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.00, S: 0.02

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: September 24, 2013, 02:29:06 AM »

1) What, exactly, is the definition of Neo-Conservatism, and how does it differ from Liberaism, traditional Conservatism, and Libertarianism? Are Compassionate Conservatives the same as Neo-Cons?

2) Going by their records, would JFK, LBJ, Nixon, Ford, Reagan and Bush I be considered Neo-Cons?

Finally

3) Is Obama a Neo-Con?
Logged
FEMA Camp Administrator
Cathcon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,354
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: September 24, 2013, 02:50:38 AM »

The only advantage in knowledge that the vast majority of potential responders have to you is having read wikipedia articles. You can quickly make up this possible gap by going there yourself, reading about the desired subject, and applying that to your other thoughts. I sure as Hell ain't gonna consult wikipedia again after doing it like three years ago on this exact topic.
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,066
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: September 24, 2013, 03:10:54 AM »

Traditionally, at least in the American context, it refers to a group of (mostly Jewish) intellectuals who, decades ago, migrated from the left to the right.  They were "neoconservatives" because they were newly conservative, having previously been on the left.  The prototypical example is Irving Kristol:

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/06/05/neoconservative-needs-to-be-retired-why-not-try-imperialist.html

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

However, since the 1990s, people started talking about a so-called second generation of neocons (like Irving Kristol's son, Bill), who adopted the same domestic political agenda as "regular" conservatives, but really only diverged on foreign policy, where they advocated a hawkish posture.  Anyway, read that Peter Beinart column that I linked to, and you'll get the gist of it.  This column might also be useful: http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/206955/neoconservative-invention/jonah-goldberg
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.031 seconds with 12 queries.