Future Senate races you're most looking forward to
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 10, 2024, 09:59:01 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Future Senate races you're most looking forward to
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Poll
Question: Which 2016 or 2018 Senate race are you most looking forward to?
#1
Alaska 2016: Murkowski's seat
 
#2
Arizona 2016: McCain
 
#3
Colorado 2016: Bennet
 
#4
Florida 2016: Rubio
 
#5
Illinois 2016: Kirk
 
#6
Iowa 2016: Grassley
 
#7
Kentucky 2016: Paul
 
#8
Nevada 2016: Reid
 
#9
New Hampshire 2016: Ayotte
 
#10
North Carolina 2016: Burr
 
#11
Ohio 2016: Portman
 
#12
Pennsylvania 2016: Toomey
 
#13
Wisconsin 2016: Johnson
 
#14
Washington 2016: Murray
 
#15
Missouri 2016: Blunt
 
#16
Indiana 2018: Donnelly
 
#17
Maine 2018: King
 
#18
Michigan 2018: Stabenow
 
#19
Missouri 2018: McCaskill
 
#20
Montana 2018: Tester
 
#21
Nevada 2018: Heller
 
#22
New Jersey 2018: Menendez
 
#23
North Dakota 2018: Heitkamp
 
#24
Ohio 2018: Brown
 
#25
Pennsylvania 2018: Casey
 
#26
Texas 2018: Cruz
 
#27
Virginia 2018: Kaine
 
#28
Wisconsin 2018: Baldwin
 
#29
New Mexico 2018: Heinrich
 
#30
Minnesota 2018: Klobuchar
 
#31
Connecticut 2018: Murphy
 
#32
California 2018: Feinstein
 
#33
Florida 2018: Nelson
 
#34
Other
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 33

Calculate results by number of options selected
Author Topic: Future Senate races you're most looking forward to  (Read 2018 times)
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 90,275
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: July 29, 2013, 07:54:48 PM »

Also, because 2012 went so well, in the event that Democrats only have a net loss of 2 or 3 seats in 2014 (very possible, especially if we pick up in KY or GA), we could get a fillibuster-proof majority of 60 seats in 2016. Depending on certain retirements, certain candidates who are giving up their seat to run for POTUS, certain possible candidates who could run, and certain incumbents who could be vulnerable, AZ, FL, GA, IA, KY, MO, NH, NC, OH, PA, and WI are all states where Democrats could potentially have pickup opportunities. Certainly, a lot of them would hinge on certain circumstances (i.e. Nixon running in MO, Rubio/Paul/Ayotte being on the national ticket for FL/KY/NH to be competitive, McCain and Grassley retiring for AZ or IA to be competitive, etc etc.)

I don't see the Dems reaching 60 votes and I can see us winning 55 votes in the senate. Best bets are Simon in Illinois, feingold in Wisconsin, and Sestak in Pennsylvania. Maggie Hassen or Tim Ryan can win in Ohio and NH but odds are less than 50/50.
Logged
Bleach Blonde Bad Built Butch Bodies for Biden
Just Passion Through
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,540
Norway


P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: July 29, 2013, 08:04:44 PM »

Moderate heroism will not save Kirk or Donnelly. Just ask Scott Brown.

Donnelly is anything but a shoe-in, but look at Evan Bayh.  He was able to serve a term and then get reelected in a landslide in a state that voted for Bush by double digits.  I think Donnelly's chances will largely depend on the climate in 2018.
Logged
Orser67
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,946
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: July 29, 2013, 09:44:17 PM »
« Edited: July 29, 2013, 09:51:16 PM by Orser67 »

AZ, FL, GA, IA, KY, MO, NH, NC, OH, PA, and WI

Agreed that Dems have another shot at 60 seats if 2014 goes well. From most likely to go D to least likely to go D, I think I'd go:

Illinois
Iowa (almost falls off the list if Grassley doesn't retire)
Wisconsin
Pennsylvania
New Hampshire
Florida
Kentucky
Ohio
Arizona
Missouri
North Carolina
Indiana
Georgia
Alaska (only if Murkowski isn't in the general election)
South Dakota (only competitive if Thune doesn't run)

Some pretty good targets there, all of which are at least Likely Republican (except for those in parantheses). Lots of first-term senators, many of whom don't have particularly strong approval ratings. Obviously 60 seats is unlikely, but people said the same thing in 2008.

Meanwhile Republicans only really have Nevada and Colorado as obvious targets.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.032 seconds with 13 queries.