MT-PPP: Schweitzer & Clinton would be competetive against Christie & Bush
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 28, 2024, 02:18:17 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  MT-PPP: Schweitzer & Clinton would be competetive against Christie & Bush
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: MT-PPP: Schweitzer & Clinton would be competetive against Christie & Bush  (Read 898 times)
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,173
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: June 28, 2013, 12:54:53 AM »

Brian Schweitzer ............................................. 42%
Chris Christie .................................................. 41%

Brian Schweitzer ............................................. 48%
Jeb Bush......................................................... 41%

...

Chris Christie .................................................. 45%
Hillary Clinton.................................................. 40%

Hillary Clinton.................................................. 45%
Jeb Bush......................................................... 45%

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/2011/PPP_Release_MT_628.pdf
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,073
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: June 28, 2013, 02:20:34 AM »

Why are they polling a general election matchup with Bush and Christie, but not Rubio?  They did do a 2016 national poll before this one, which still hasn't been released yet.  (Maybe tomorrow?)  Maybe in that national poll, Bush and Christie are the top two for the GOP nomination?

Also, the gender gap continues to be enormous in general election matchups with Clinton.  But with Schweitzer, it's notably narrower.
Logged
Kleine Scheiße
PeteHam
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,770
United States


Political Matrix
E: -9.16, S: -1.74

P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: June 30, 2013, 12:18:43 AM »
« Edited: June 30, 2013, 12:20:20 AM by PeteHam »

Why are they polling a general election matchup with Bush and Christie, but not Rubio?


Rubio may have lost favor due to the immigration/amnesty thing.
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,073
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: June 30, 2013, 12:20:22 AM »

Why are they polling a general election matchup with Bush and Christie, but not Rubio?  They did do a 2016 national poll before this one, which still hasn't been released yet.  (Maybe tomorrow?)  Maybe in that national poll, Bush and Christie are the top two for the GOP nomination?

Also, the gender gap continues to be enormous in general election matchups with Clinton.  But with Schweitzer, it's notably narrower.


Rubio may have lost favor due to the immigration/amnesty thing.

Right, but how would PPP know that without a new national poll?  That's why I'm wondering if they conducted a national poll but forgot to release it:

https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=175579.0
Logged
politicallefty
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,200
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.87, S: -9.22

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: June 30, 2013, 08:37:30 AM »

Those are pretty good numbers for Hillary, especially considering PPP hasn't been particularly favourable to her. I do hope she can get some strong results in the Intermountain West. Democrats winning four or even five of those states would be very significant.
Logged
barfbag
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,611
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.26, S: -0.87

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: July 05, 2013, 08:02:04 PM »

Those are pretty good numbers for Hillary, especially considering PPP hasn't been particularly favourable to her. I do hope she can get some strong results in the Intermountain West. Democrats winning four or even five of those states would be very significant.

Would be, but is it over for the GOP in MT now because of a poll taken in 2013? I think it would be better to wait until the election and then see who wins.
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,842
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: July 12, 2013, 03:27:50 AM »

Those are pretty good numbers for Hillary, especially considering PPP hasn't been particularly favourable to her. I do hope she can get some strong results in the Intermountain West. Democrats winning four or even five of those states would be very significant.

Would be, but is it over for the GOP in MT now because of a poll taken in 2013? I think it would be better to wait until the election and then see who wins.

...which is like saying that you might as well not talk about the baseball World Series until the last out is made.
Logged
barfbag
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,611
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.26, S: -0.87

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: July 13, 2013, 12:13:49 AM »

Those are pretty good numbers for Hillary, especially considering PPP hasn't been particularly favourable to her. I do hope she can get some strong results in the Intermountain West. Democrats winning four or even five of those states would be very significant.

Would be, but is it over for the GOP in MT now because of a poll taken in 2013? I think it would be better to wait until the election and then see who wins.

...which is like saying that you might as well not talk about the baseball World Series until the last out is made.

It's like talking about it before knowing the playoff teams though as the primaries haven't even started yet. Most states start out close and then move apart if they aren't already battleground states. Maybe I was being a grump before.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.034 seconds with 14 queries.