UK General Election - May 7th 2015
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 31, 2024, 09:50:44 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  International Elections (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  UK General Election - May 7th 2015
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 52 53 54 55 56 [57] 58 59 60 61 62 ... 75
Author Topic: UK General Election - May 7th 2015  (Read 278106 times)
Joe Republic
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,162
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1400 on: February 10, 2015, 04:25:04 AM »

^ Farage endorsed AV during the 2011 referendum.

http://blogs.spectator.co.uk/coffeehouse/2011/05/farage-av-is-the-thin-of-the-wedge-thats-why-we-support-it/
Logged
Zinneke
JosepBroz
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,088
Belgium


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1401 on: February 10, 2015, 08:25:41 AM »

Is Galloway heading for another Labour counter-attack in a GE or can he redo what he did in Bethnall Green? Who is the likely candidate to replace him?
Logged
ChrisDR68
PoshPaws68
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 395
United Kingdom
WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1402 on: February 10, 2015, 11:51:41 AM »


AV isn't a proportional system though. In fact in some ways it's FPTP on speed as it can easily result in an already one sided result being even more one sided Shocked

The Lib Dems were foolish to agree to a referendum on AV in 2010 (as well as foolish to agree to a number of essentially Tory policies in key areas at the same time... although that's a whole other discussion Cheesy).

I remember at the time William Hague told the Libs it was the Tories final offer on this issue and they could take it or leave it. In hindsight they should have called the Tories bluff as they were in quite a strong negotiating position at the time and insisted on a more proportional system being offered on the referendum ballot paper.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,890
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1403 on: February 10, 2015, 12:01:39 PM »

I think by this point its clear that we can just say that 'The LibDems were foolish' and leave it at that...
Logged
Phony Moderate
Obamaisdabest
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,298
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1404 on: February 10, 2015, 12:22:52 PM »
« Edited: February 10, 2015, 12:24:58 PM by Phony Moderate »

The Political Compass has published its 2015 UK party chart and analysis: http://www.politicalcompass.org/uk2015

Highlight:
Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

LOL
Logged
Serenity Now
tomm_86
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,174
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1405 on: February 10, 2015, 12:58:41 PM »

The Political Compass has published its 2015 UK party chart and analysis: http://www.politicalcompass.org/uk2015

Highlight:
Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

LOL

Their UK party charts are preposterous, to say the least.
Logged
You kip if you want to...
change08
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,940
United Kingdom
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1406 on: February 10, 2015, 01:11:03 PM »

The Political Compass has published its 2015 UK party chart and analysis: http://www.politicalcompass.org/uk2015

Highlight:
Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

LOL

AHA. That's bordering on offensive.
Logged
EPG
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 992
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1407 on: February 10, 2015, 03:34:26 PM »

Is Galloway heading for another Labour counter-attack in a GE or can he redo what he did in Bethnall Green? Who is the likely candidate to replace him?

There is little information about Bradford West abroad, though there are lots of Yorkshire delegates here whou might know.
Logged
morgieb
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,643
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -8.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1408 on: February 10, 2015, 03:48:11 PM »

The Political Compass has published its 2015 UK party chart and analysis: http://www.politicalcompass.org/uk2015

Highlight:
Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

LOL
hahahahahahahahh
Logged
🦀🎂🦀🎂
CrabCake
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,344
Kiribati


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1409 on: February 10, 2015, 04:23:30 PM »

The Political Compass has published its 2015 UK party chart and analysis: http://www.politicalcompass.org/uk2015

Highlight:
Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

LOL

Their UK party charts are preposterous, to say the least.

What are you saying that Labour was more left-wing under Foot than it was under Harold Wilson?Huh (They actually think that 1983 labour was to the right of a decade previous)

I do like the implied insult to Labour voters. 'Bloody plebs don't know what is good for them' Such tolerant lefties the Compass crew.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,890
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1410 on: February 10, 2015, 06:45:30 PM »

Is Galloway heading for another Labour counter-attack in a GE or can he redo what he did in Bethnall Green? Who is the likely candidate to replace him?

There is little information about Bradford West abroad, though there are lots of Yorkshire delegates here whou might know.

You wouldn't just need to be from Yorkshire (or even Bradford) to know, you'd need to be from the Mirpuri Pakistani community in Bradford...
Logged
doktorb
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,072
United Kingdom


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1411 on: February 10, 2015, 09:32:15 PM »

I think by this point its clear that we can just say that 'The LibDems were foolish' and leave it at that...


Providing stable government when the country needed it, not foolish
Logged
SNJ1985
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,277
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.19, S: 7.57

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1412 on: February 10, 2015, 10:08:52 PM »


Ah, thanks.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,890
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1413 on: February 11, 2015, 02:08:46 PM »

Galloway won the election openly condemning such tribalist politics. He might even have attracted white middle class votes from that stance. I imagine Labour have learned their lesson.

Ahahaha, yeah, right. What he actually did (and quite brilliantly) was use clan politics while also loudly condemning it. In his own very, very specific way he may actually be a genius (e.g. he claimed to be a better Muslim than his (Muslim) opponent despite not actually being a Muslim. It was a devastatingly successful personal attack).
Logged
EPG
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 992
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1414 on: February 11, 2015, 02:40:23 PM »

Look at the man's M.O., touring the country looking for hotspots - he would be dangerous if he were, like Farage, less obviously repulsive.
Logged
ChrisDR68
PoshPaws68
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 395
United Kingdom
WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1415 on: February 11, 2015, 03:20:14 PM »

It's amazing Gorgeous George has had any sort of career in politics after this episode in the presence of a certain late Iraqi leader Shocked

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IIy_GmvUElE

He also comes across a slightly mad and very angry on shows like Question Time. A bit of a nutter? Hmm... yes I think so Cheesy
Logged
Phony Moderate
Obamaisdabest
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,298
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1416 on: February 12, 2015, 06:40:31 AM »

Ipsos-MORI:

Labour - 36% (+2)
Tories - 34% (+1)
UKIP - 9% (-2)
Greens - 7% (-1)
Lib Dems - 6% (-2)

So UKIP may be showing signs of decline, but it doesn't seem to be helping the Tories.
Logged
You kip if you want to...
change08
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,940
United Kingdom
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1417 on: February 12, 2015, 06:52:03 AM »

Ipsos-MORI:

Labour - 36% (+2)
Tories - 34% (+1)
UKIP - 9% (-2)
Greens - 7% (-1)
Lib Dems - 6% (-2)

So UKIP may be showing signs of decline, but it doesn't seem to be helping the Tories.

One poll. No one else is showing this.

Still no maj for Labour though.
Logged
Gary J
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 286
United Kingdom
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1418 on: February 12, 2015, 09:07:49 AM »

Presumably if Lib Dem pressure in 2010 had got a PR referendum, it would have faced exactly the same Tory misrepresentation as the AV referendum did. At least there is still the remote chance that at some future date PR will re-emerge on to the agenda, which would have been prevented if a PR referendum had been lost.
Logged
You kip if you want to...
change08
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,940
United Kingdom
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1419 on: February 12, 2015, 09:43:52 AM »

Presumably if Lib Dem pressure in 2010 had got a PR referendum, it would have faced exactly the same Tory misrepresentation as the AV referendum did. At least there is still the remote chance that at some future date PR will re-emerge on to the agenda, which would have been prevented if a PR referendum had been lost.

AV was lost because it was too complicated a system and it looked desperately self serving on the part of the LibDems.
Logged
ChrisDR68
PoshPaws68
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 395
United Kingdom
WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1420 on: February 12, 2015, 11:24:18 AM »

Presumably if Lib Dem pressure in 2010 had got a PR referendum, it would have faced exactly the same Tory misrepresentation as the AV referendum did. At least there is still the remote chance that at some future date PR will re-emerge on to the agenda, which would have been prevented if a PR referendum had been lost.

PR for Westminster elections is probably inevitable given the ongoing decline in the Tories' and Labour's vote share. That decline generally makes hung parliaments more likely and as all the smaller parties are in favour of it the two big parties will come under ever increasing pressure to adopt it as a condition of their support in a potential coalition government.

My prediction is we'll have FPTP for the next three UK general elections then some form of PR thereafter (with probably something similar to the system used to elect the Scottish parliament).
Logged
Gary J
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 286
United Kingdom
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1421 on: February 12, 2015, 11:48:54 AM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

AV is much simpler than any system of PR. The pro AV campaign probably failed to explain it adequately. It also failed to provide an emotional case for why people should support it (ie the Tory fat cats do not like it, so it must be good).

If the AV system was perceived as self serving for Lib Dems, then the anti-AV campaign did succeed in making an emotional case against the change.

In fact many Lib Dems were distinctly lukewarm about AV because it was an inadequate move towards change/fair votes, which would have provided minimal benefit at best and might have been less favourable to the party than FPTP in other circumstances. Certainly AV would have been less favourable to the Lib Dems than any form of PR.

However in an environment where there are multiple medium sized parties, an argument based on antipathy to any one of them is less likely to be persuasive than if there was only one which seemed likely to benefit. If we continue to have a series of inconclusive elections then electoral reform may eventually come back on the agenda.
Logged
doktorb
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,072
United Kingdom


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1422 on: February 12, 2015, 11:52:23 AM »

Presumably if Lib Dem pressure in 2010 had got a PR referendum, it would have faced exactly the same Tory misrepresentation as the AV referendum did. At least there is still the remote chance that at some future date PR will re-emerge on to the agenda, which would have been prevented if a PR referendum had been lost.

AV was lost because it was too complicated a system and it looked desperately self serving on the part of the LibDems.

AV was lost because of self serving media manipulation and a spineless, bitter, timid Labour Party. There is nothing complicated about AV. There is nothing duplicitous or suspicious about it.

I can never, ever, forgive Labour for their role in killing off constitutional reform.
Logged
DL
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,461
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1423 on: February 12, 2015, 11:54:42 AM »

Ipsos-MORI:

Labour - 36% (+2)
Tories - 34% (+1)
UKIP - 9% (-2)
Greens - 7% (-1)
Lib Dems - 6% (-2)

So UKIP may be showing signs of decline, but it doesn't seem to be helping the Tories.

One poll. No one else is showing this.

Still no maj for Labour though.

Actually a lot of recent polls have shown UKIP declining bit by bit...some of that would be anti-Tory voters going back to Labour
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,890
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1424 on: February 12, 2015, 11:58:24 AM »

AV was lost because of self serving media manipulation and a spineless, bitter, timid Labour Party. There is nothing complicated about AV. There is nothing duplicitous or suspicious about it.

I can never, ever, forgive Labour for their role in killing off constitutional reform.

lol
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 52 53 54 55 56 [57] 58 59 60 61 62 ... 75  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.051 seconds with 10 queries.