1996 United States Presidential Election

[Goldwater]

Perot.

[Lief 🗽]

Nader/Sanders is the only good ticket! I hope the liberals abandon Cuomo and vote Nader.

Guys this is probably the only way we get to have Bernie Sanders for president in 2004. Don't screw this up!!!

[H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY]

Hm. I'm torn between Nader and Cuomo, but seeing as Nader's in 2nd and Cuomo's in 3rd, I'm leaning towards calling the whole left to rally behind Nader/Sanders, if we must rally around one of them.

[H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY]

Come on, left!

[LastVoter]

Nader/Sanders is the only good ticket! I hope the liberals abandon Cuomo and vote Nader.

Guys this is probably the only way we get to have Bernie Sanders for president in 2004. Don't screw this up!!!

[Kaine for Senate '18]

Cuomo

[BluegrassBlueVote]

Couldn't resist.

[H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY]

Will this split in the left elect Perot? Stay tuned to find out!

[Napoleon]

Cuomo. Lol at the Republican ticket.

[OAM]

Vote Perot and protest election fraud.  The Republicans should be with us on this.

What election fraud?

Buchanan and Nader in the Reform slot.

But they both won.

By fraud....?  Even if you don't agree, you see what the implication I was going for was, yes?

I see the implication, yes; I was saying that they won in their own right. The only nominee who it could be argued was nominated fraudulently was Leonard Wood.

Now say that again with a straight face

[morgieb]

Nader!

[politicallefty]

I vote to reelect the President and Vice President. I really cannot stand Ralph Nader, so he does not get my vote.

[TNF]

Nader is a union-busting prick. Voted Cuomo without a second thought.

[Maxwell]

Mecham?  seriously?  cause this election didn't have quite enough crazy?

Browne I guess.

[MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!]

Cuomo/Brown

[H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY]

Vote Perot and protest election fraud.  The Republicans should be with us on this.

What election fraud?

Buchanan and Nader in the Reform slot.

But they both won.

By fraud....?  Even if you don't agree, you see what the implication I was going for was, yes?

I see the implication, yes; I was saying that they won in their own right. The only nominee who it could be argued was nominated fraudulently was Leonard Wood.

Now say that again with a straight face

Gladly. What evidence do you have that Buchanan and Nader were nominated fraudulently? Also, do you think all those Clinton votes in the 1992 and 1996 Democratic primaries were frauds or real?

[SUSAN CRUSHBONE]

15-15-15! No matter how this ends up, it needs to go to the House.

[H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY]

15-15-15! No matter how this ends up, it needs to go to the House.

Perot will probably win there - the five other votes are for Buchanan and Browne.

[OAM]

Vote Perot and protest election fraud.  The Republicans should be with us on this.

What election fraud?

Buchanan and Nader in the Reform slot.

But they both won.

By fraud....?  Even if you don't agree, you see what the implication I was going for was, yes?

I see the implication, yes; I was saying that they won in their own right. The only nominee who it could be argued was nominated fraudulently was Leonard Wood.

Now say that again with a straight face

Gladly. What evidence do you have that Buchanan and Nader were nominated fraudulently? Also, do you think all those Clinton votes in the 1992 and 1996 Democratic primaries were frauds or real?

Perhaps the fact that people have been admitting to it?

[H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY]

Vote Perot and protest election fraud.  The Republicans should be with us on this.

What election fraud?

Buchanan and Nader in the Reform slot.

But they both won.

By fraud....?  Even if you don't agree, you see what the implication I was going for was, yes?

I see the implication, yes; I was saying that they won in their own right. The only nominee who it could be argued was nominated fraudulently was Leonard Wood.

Now say that again with a straight face

Gladly. What evidence do you have that Buchanan and Nader were nominated fraudulently? Also, do you think all those Clinton votes in the 1992 and 1996 Democratic primaries were frauds or real?

Perhaps the fact that people have been admitting to it?

Uh, who has been admitting to it? Show me proof.

[OAM]

Vote Perot and protest election fraud.  The Republicans should be with us on this.

What election fraud?

Buchanan and Nader in the Reform slot.

But they both won.

By fraud....?  Even if you don't agree, you see what the implication I was going for was, yes?

I see the implication, yes; I was saying that they won in their own right. The only nominee who it could be argued was nominated fraudulently was Leonard Wood.

Now say that again with a straight face

Gladly. What evidence do you have that Buchanan and Nader were nominated fraudulently? Also, do you think all those Clinton votes in the 1992 and 1996 Democratic primaries were frauds or real?

Perhaps the fact that people have been admitting to it?

Uh, who has been admitting to it? Show me proof.

Read the Republican run off thread.  Even if you guys were voting for not-Buchanan, it doesn't matter.

[SUSAN CRUSHBONE]

Vote Perot and protest election fraud.  The Republicans should be with us on this.

What election fraud?

Buchanan and Nader in the Reform slot.

But they both won.

By fraud....?  Even if you don't agree, you see what the implication I was going for was, yes?

I see the implication, yes; I was saying that they won in their own right. The only nominee who it could be argued was nominated fraudulently was Leonard Wood.

Now say that again with a straight face

Gladly. What evidence do you have that Buchanan and Nader were nominated fraudulently? Also, do you think all those Clinton votes in the 1992 and 1996 Democratic primaries were frauds or real?

Perhaps the fact that people have been admitting to it?

Uh, who has been admitting to it? Show me proof.

Read the Republican run off thread.  Even if you guys were voting for not-Buchanan, it doesn't matter.

I, for one, genuinely would've voted Specter in the general.

[H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY]

Vote Perot and protest election fraud.  The Republicans should be with us on this.

What election fraud?

Buchanan and Nader in the Reform slot.

But they both won.

By fraud....?  Even if you don't agree, you see what the implication I was going for was, yes?

I see the implication, yes; I was saying that they won in their own right. The only nominee who it could be argued was nominated fraudulently was Leonard Wood.

Now say that again with a straight face

Gladly. What evidence do you have that Buchanan and Nader were nominated fraudulently? Also, do you think all those Clinton votes in the 1992 and 1996 Democratic primaries were frauds or real?

Perhaps the fact that people have been admitting to it?

Uh, who has been admitting to it? Show me proof.

Read the Republican run off thread.  Even if you guys were voting for not-Buchanan, it doesn't matter.

So...Buchanan was nominated fraudulently because Democrats voted against him? How does that work?

[OAM]

Vote Perot and protest election fraud.  The Republicans should be with us on this.

What election fraud?

Buchanan and Nader in the Reform slot.

But they both won.

By fraud....?  Even if you don't agree, you see what the implication I was going for was, yes?

I see the implication, yes; I was saying that they won in their own right. The only nominee who it could be argued was nominated fraudulently was Leonard Wood.

Now say that again with a straight face

Gladly. What evidence do you have that Buchanan and Nader were nominated fraudulently? Also, do you think all those Clinton votes in the 1992 and 1996 Democratic primaries were frauds or real?

Perhaps the fact that people have been admitting to it?

Uh, who has been admitting to it? Show me proof.

Read the Republican run off thread.  Even if you guys were voting for not-Buchanan, it doesn't matter.

So...Buchanan was nominated fraudulently because Democrats voted against him? How does that work?

Well, there's two points.

1)  It could be a cover up

2)  Others who did not talk.

[H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY]

Vote Perot and protest election fraud.  The Republicans should be with us on this.

What election fraud?

Buchanan and Nader in the Reform slot.

But they both won.

By fraud....?  Even if you don't agree, you see what the implication I was going for was, yes?

I see the implication, yes; I was saying that they won in their own right. The only nominee who it could be argued was nominated fraudulently was Leonard Wood.

Now say that again with a straight face

Gladly. What evidence do you have that Buchanan and Nader were nominated fraudulently? Also, do you think all those Clinton votes in the 1992 and 1996 Democratic primaries were frauds or real?

Perhaps the fact that people have been admitting to it?

Uh, who has been admitting to it? Show me proof.

Read the Republican run off thread.  Even if you guys were voting for not-Buchanan, it doesn't matter.

So...Buchanan was nominated fraudulently because Democrats voted against him? How does that work?

Well, there's two points.

1)  It could be a cover up

2)  Others who did not talk.

Not sure if serious or just trolling.