Virginia Governor's Race 2013 -Who's Gonna Win? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 29, 2024, 08:22:22 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Gubernatorial/State Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Virginia Governor's Race 2013 -Who's Gonna Win? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Who do you think is most likely to win this November?
#1
Terry McAuliffe (D)
 
#2
Ken Cuccinelli (R)
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 168

Author Topic: Virginia Governor's Race 2013 -Who's Gonna Win?  (Read 67275 times)
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« on: August 04, 2013, 12:15:52 AM »

Here's looking forward to 2017!

Hey Hey, Ho Ho
TBD has got to go.

Yeah, great rallying cry considering Virginia has one term term limits for their Governor.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« Reply #1 on: September 18, 2013, 09:41:47 AM »

McAuliffe now only leads Cuccinelli 44% to 41%. That's down from 48% to 42% last month. The Libertarian is at 7%.

Cuccinelli still has horrible favor ability ratings (34% to 51%) while voters are split 38% to 38% on McAuliffe. I think this says way more about Terry's unpopularity since he can only muster a three point lead against an even more personally unpopular candidate.

http://www.politico.com/story/2013/09/ken-cuccinelli-terry-mcauliffe-virginia-governor-2013-poll-96976.html
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« Reply #2 on: September 18, 2013, 10:24:36 AM »

Yeah, I think people are starting to realize that the alternative is, you know, Terry McAuliffe.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« Reply #3 on: September 26, 2013, 06:28:41 PM »


Considering the hatred for both candidates, maybe sixteen Virginians (not counting campaign staffers).
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« Reply #4 on: October 04, 2013, 09:58:13 AM »

There's a (university) poll out showing Terry up five.

http://m.washingtonpost.com/local/dc-politics/hampton-university-poll-shows-mcauliffe-with-an-edge-in-close-virginia-governors-race/2013/10/03/366f0ed8-2c7b-11e3-b139-029811dbb57f_story.html
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« Reply #5 on: October 11, 2013, 07:59:21 AM »

The thought of Terry McAuliffe winning any elected public office (let alone Governor of a swing state) is astonishing and all of you would agree if you set aside your feelings on Cuccinelli.

Anyway, Terry will be an unquestionably disastrous Governor, most likely scandal plagued and extremely unpopular. VA Dems will be tagged as "McAuliffe Democrats" over the next few years and the GOP will benefit.

Cuccinelli is simply falling on his sword to ensure greater days to come. You all talk about the day that marked the end of this campaign. That's fine. I look at it this way though: Inauguration Day is when the VA GOP will be reborn.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« Reply #6 on: October 11, 2013, 11:42:23 AM »

You claim to know the future but what's stopping the Republicans in Virginia to be labelled "Cuccinelli Republicans" now? You always roll your eyes at people for making stupid predictions, but you just made one right there.

It's a feeling I have based on McAuliffe's history and demeanor. It's not like the repeated idiotic predictions made with complete certitude about U.S. Senate elections that are three to five years away.

And...uh...I'm sure there are plenty of Republicans being labeled "Cuccinelli Republicans" now. That's a cool attack for now, I guess. It's going to be a different story when you have four years of the other guy in power.


Uh, no. The idea that McAuliffe will be unpopular or scandal plagued isn't some hack point. You can disagree but that doesn't make the suggestion a joke.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« Reply #7 on: October 11, 2013, 04:24:36 PM »

Dems love referencing 2004. "It's not 2004 anymore!" It's their way of saying, "We've moved on from the Bush years/once pretty popular culturally conservative positions motivating the nation." It was a GOP base-driven time. You'll remember how exit polls showed that "moral issues" were the top concern for many voters that year. Gay marriage bans were on the ballot in many states, helping to turn out social conservatives. This was a low point for their party so they're naturally going to enjoy reminding themselves that those days are over.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« Reply #8 on: October 11, 2013, 05:07:15 PM »

This was a low point for their party so they're naturally going to enjoy reminding themselves that those days are over.

Everybody who doesn't prey on hate enjoys being reminded of that.

Love it when you speak über hack to me, baby.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« Reply #9 on: October 11, 2013, 06:32:56 PM »


Well, being gay married myself, my priority is for my own life and not for "my own party's lows." Yes, I enjoy reminding myself that we don't have a majority of Americans voting on my rights and blaming me for their own problems. What a partisan I am.

You were speaking as a partisan when you referred to Cuccinelli's style of politics, my friend. And I was generally referring to Dems, not specifically gays or gay Dems, when they say, "It isn't 2004 anymore!" They're obviously speaking from a partisan perspective.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« Reply #10 on: October 23, 2013, 08:54:04 AM »


"It's not over yet..."
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« Reply #11 on: October 23, 2013, 01:34:24 PM »


...I was mocking my infamous comment from 2006, pal.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« Reply #12 on: October 23, 2013, 02:27:19 PM »


Then you really don't matter.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« Reply #13 on: October 28, 2013, 08:44:10 PM »

Terry McAuilffe winning in a landslide is almost literally nauseating.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« Reply #14 on: October 29, 2013, 07:40:46 AM »

Terry McAuilffe winning in a landslide is almost literally nauseating.

You brought it upon yourselves.

It's our fault Virginians are Italophobic? That's what this is really about.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« Reply #15 on: October 29, 2013, 02:28:27 PM »

Terry McAuilffe winning in a landslide is almost literally nauseating.

You brought it upon yourselves.

It's our fault Virginians are Italophobic? That's what this is really about.
Ah yes, because Cuccinelli's swarthy complexion is what's really the issue.

I'm glad someone understands.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« Reply #16 on: October 30, 2013, 11:39:59 AM »

Shades of Phil circa 2006 with the PA Senate race but...

New Quinnipiac shows McAuliffe only up 45% to 41% with 4% undecided - http://www.politico.com/story/2013/10/virginia-governor-race-ken-cuccinelli-terry-mcauliffe-poll-99080.html?hp=r3

With Sarvis out of the question, McAuliffe's lead is down to two points. Only 62% of Sarvis voters are said to be definitely voting for him.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« Reply #17 on: October 31, 2013, 01:04:59 PM »

From RRH. Two of the worst-regarded pollsters have their (I'm assuming) final polls out:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

And the worst of them all has Cuccinelli down by one. 41-40-10.

I'm honestly questioning whether they're making numbers up or not. Phil's poll says it's an outlier, but it's actually semi-reasonable for a floor. This is just based completely out of reality.

Phil's poll. Has a nice ring to it. Maybe Phil's Political Polling or PPP.

Sadly, though, it wasn't "Phil's poll." It was Quinnipiac.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« Reply #18 on: November 01, 2013, 10:22:33 AM »

Does anyone know if McAuliffe is for or against the death penalty ?

Didn't find a lot on Google ...

Hmmm. Not entirely sure but Bill and Hillary are still for it, right? That probably gives you your answer.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« Reply #19 on: November 01, 2013, 03:27:27 PM »

Virginia Dems have released a new ad highlighting Santorum's campaigning on behalf of Cuccinelli.

Remember what I said about Italophobia...?
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« Reply #20 on: November 06, 2013, 08:55:42 AM »


Being Terry McAuliffe didn't help, for one.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« Reply #21 on: November 08, 2013, 10:54:39 AM »

Ken Cuccinelli won 18-24 year olds by six points.

If that doesn't shoot down some talking points, I don't know what will.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.045 seconds with 13 queries.