North Korea declares War on South Korea
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 06:01:52 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  International General Discussion (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  North Korea declares War on South Korea
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9
Author Topic: North Korea declares War on South Korea  (Read 13946 times)
bullmoose88
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,515


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #50 on: April 03, 2013, 09:20:49 PM »

Do we think the PLA amassing on the border is a good sign or a bad one.

Logged
Incipimus iterum
1236
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,096
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #51 on: April 03, 2013, 11:42:58 PM »

Do we think the PLA amassing on the border is a good sign or a bad one.


a good sign
Logged
dead0man
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,564
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #52 on: April 04, 2013, 12:16:40 AM »

Do we think the PLA amassing on the border is a good sign or a bad one.
Probably a good sign, but we're not 100% sure.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,876


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #53 on: April 04, 2013, 03:28:19 AM »

Haven't they been at a state of war for 63 years now?
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,876


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #54 on: April 04, 2013, 03:36:10 AM »


I think the most likely reason would be to stop millions of refuges from entering China from North Korea.
Logged
dead0man
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,564
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #55 on: April 04, 2013, 03:55:08 AM »
« Edited: April 04, 2013, 04:15:27 AM by dead0man »

That would make the most sense, but....we still should keep an eye on it.

Plausibly they could be planning a regime change of their own in N.Korea.  Make contact with a few high ranking people, tell them the deal.  March into Pyongyang untouched and replace Un with one of the brothers that is more willing to play ball with the PRC.

But really, we don't know.  Your guess is the most likely though.
Logged
afleitch
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,958


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #56 on: April 04, 2013, 04:09:04 AM »

China could remove Kim from power very easily. He would be deposed the moment they crossed the border. North Korea has no real friends or allies so no one would be particularly upset at such a regime change.
Logged
dead0man
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,564
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #57 on: April 04, 2013, 04:15:15 AM »

That would probably be best for all concerned, but I'm not sure if the PRC wants that or if they could pull it off as easy as we are making it out to be.  I mean, it could be easy as a phone call to the right guy or as hard as the N.Korea Army can possibly make it.
Logged
Zanas
Zanas46
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,947
France


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #58 on: April 04, 2013, 05:26:48 AM »

There's also a non trivial possibility that at least some part of the North Korean people would rebel against invading China to protect their leader and national integrity... They are conditioned to believe in that from cradle to tomb after all...
Logged
Cory
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,708


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #59 on: April 04, 2013, 12:16:23 PM »

Do we think the PLA amassing on the border is a good sign or a bad one.

A good one I think. They are there to either...

A.) Contain the massive flow of refugees from North Korea in the case of war.

or

B.) Invade North Korea if they use nuclear weapons.
Logged
Bleach Blonde Bad Built Butch Bodies for Biden
Just Passion Through
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,481
Norway


P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #60 on: April 04, 2013, 05:20:24 PM »

China could remove Kim from power very easily. He would be deposed the moment they crossed the border. North Korea has no real friends or allies so no one would be particularly upset at such a regime change.

I suppose if they wanted to, they could do that, yes.  But hasn't China been aiding North Korea for years?
Logged
Smid
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,151
Australia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #61 on: April 04, 2013, 06:09:02 PM »

Do we think the PLA amassing on the border is a good sign or a bad one.

A good one I think. They are there to either...

A.) Contain the massive flow of refugees from North Korea in the case of war.

or

B.) Invade North Korea if they use nuclear weapons.

Or C, annex North Korea if America attacks?
Logged
Benj
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 979


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #62 on: April 04, 2013, 06:52:53 PM »
« Edited: April 04, 2013, 06:56:31 PM by Benj »

Do we think the PLA amassing on the border is a good sign or a bad one.

A good one I think. They are there to either...

A.) Contain the massive flow of refugees from North Korea in the case of war.

or

B.) Invade North Korea if they use nuclear weapons.

Or C, annex North Korea if America attacks?

I don't see why they'd do that. China likes having North Korea around as a buffer state, but if they annexed North Korea, there'd be no buffer any more. And no one really wants to deal with the extremely impoverished people of North Korea, China included; only South Korea would be able to overcome that disinclination with nationalism.

I know I sound paranoid here, but could this potentially lead to a draft?

We don't need the draft to beat North Korea to a pulp if necessary.
Logged
Joe Biden is your president. Deal with it.
diskymike44
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,838


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #63 on: April 04, 2013, 07:02:31 PM »

Someone needs to cap Kim Jong Un to shut up him up lol
Logged
Middle-aged Europe
Old Europe
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,282
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #64 on: April 05, 2013, 09:39:49 AM »

It seems that in order to stay in power, Kim Jong Un has to prove to the generals that he's not afraid of seeking military conflict with the United States. Of course, seeking military conflict with the United States could eventually cause the downfall of him and his regime. He's playing an insane game in which he could lose no matter what he does.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #65 on: April 05, 2013, 09:49:13 AM »

The biggest clue for North Korea's intentions is the Kaesong Industrial Complex. They need tha t revenue far too badly to cut themselves off via saber-rattling. Since it was built it's remained open through every escalation.

North Korea is now messing with Kaesong: http://www.cnn.com/2013/04/03/world/asia/koreas-tensions/index.html?hpt=hp_t1

This period of saber rattling seems like its gone on longer and gotten more heated then normal; I don't know what could possibly make the regime think this much brinksmanship is necessary.
Prob'ly it's just that the US hasn't signed the cheque yet.
Logged
dead0man
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,564
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #66 on: April 05, 2013, 11:28:59 AM »
« Edited: April 05, 2013, 12:53:54 PM by dead0man »

Report: North Korea loads missiles onto launchers
Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
This is a big step in a bad direction.
Logged
Silent Hunter
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,394
United Kingdom


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #67 on: April 05, 2013, 12:50:41 PM »

At the moment, I'd say the DPRK is trying to do everything military and political it can without doing anything pretty much irreversible e.g. call up reserves.
Logged
Beet
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,018


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #68 on: April 05, 2013, 03:22:41 PM »

I see parallels between this and the July crisis (1914). No one really expects anything serious, but once the rhetoric and military mobilization reach a certain point, it becomes harder and harder to climb down. It is really impossible to imagine what is going on internally inside North Korea, what the top leadership is thinking. A war would certainly lead to the death of all of them.
Logged
Silent Hunter
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,394
United Kingdom


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #69 on: April 05, 2013, 04:37:00 PM »

I see parallels between this and the July crisis (1914). No one really expects anything serious, but once the rhetoric and military mobilization reach a certain point, it becomes harder and harder to climb down. It is really impossible to imagine what is going on internally inside North Korea, what the top leadership is thinking. A war would certainly lead to the death of all of them.

I had a similar thought about 1914. As for a war leading to the death of all of them, I doubt it. There are usually some survivors from dictatorships that lose wars - and many dictators end up in exile rather than dead.
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,066
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #70 on: April 05, 2013, 06:44:14 PM »

There are usually some survivors from dictatorships that lose wars - and many dictators end up in exile rather than dead.

Though it's less common in today's world than in the days of yore.  Now that there's the ICC and similar international courts, it's harder for deposed dictators to find a safe place to escape to.
Logged
Fmr President & Senator Polnut
polnut
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,489
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -2.71, S: -5.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #71 on: April 05, 2013, 07:36:49 PM »

The only problem with escalation having to lead somewhere (a la 1914) is that it requires both coming from a place of relative strength... most sensible analysts stress that this would be 'suicidal' for NK.

Part of this could be trying to get South Korea and the US to blink and attack... perhaps thinking they'd pull China in on their side.
Logged
retromike22
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,469
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #72 on: April 06, 2013, 01:16:06 PM »

I wonder if any of this is Dennis Rodman's fault...
Logged
John Dibble
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,732
Japan


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #73 on: April 06, 2013, 04:38:47 PM »

I wonder if any of this is Dennis Rodman's fault...

...maybe.

http://www.policymic.com/articles/33239/3-ways-dennis-rodman-might-have-started-the-north-korean-crisis
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,198
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #74 on: April 07, 2013, 05:13:31 AM »

Kim "Eric Cartman" Jong-un needs the dog-whisperer treatment:

http://www.southparkstudios.com/full-episodes/s10e07-tsst
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.055 seconds with 12 queries.