2004 Democratic Primary
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 11:30:14 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2004 U.S. Presidential Election
  2004 Democratic Primary
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 21 22 23 24 25 [26] 27 28 29 30 31 ... 59
Author Topic: 2004 Democratic Primary  (Read 440015 times)
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #625 on: January 03, 2004, 11:13:40 AM »

1-Bernie Sanders of vermont, who is a socialist.
Logged
DarthKosh
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 902


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #626 on: January 03, 2004, 01:07:32 PM »

1-Bernie Sanders of vermont, who is a socialist.

That tells you alot about Vermont.
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #627 on: January 03, 2004, 01:15:12 PM »

1-Bernie Sanders of vermont, who is a socialist.

That tells you alot about Vermont.
Why's that?  You think vermont is a commie hideout?
Logged
NHPolitico
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,303


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #628 on: January 03, 2004, 02:49:22 PM »

1-Bernie Sanders of vermont, who is a socialist.

That tells you alot about Vermont.
Why's that?  You think vermont is a commie hideout?

They call it social justice, not communism/socialism.
Logged
12th Doctor
supersoulty
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,584
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #629 on: January 03, 2004, 03:17:27 PM »

1-Bernie Sanders of vermont, who is a socialist.

That tells you alot about Vermont.
Why's that?  You think vermont is a commie hideout?

They call it social justice, not communism/socialism.

A rose by any other name....
Logged
jravnsbo
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,888


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #630 on: January 03, 2004, 05:02:33 PM »

VT- bernie sanders socialist

Sen Leahy, next best thing to Bernie

Sen Jumping Jim Jeffords, Independant to give Dem power


Civil union laws

Howard Dean

enough said about VT and its lefties
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #631 on: January 03, 2004, 05:14:21 PM »

VT- bernie sanders socialist

Sen Leahy, next best thing to Bernie

Sen Jumping Jim Jeffords, Independant to give Dem power


Civil union laws

Howard Dean

enough said about VT and its lefties
How is Jeffords a lefty?  He is an anti-GOP centrist libertarian.  McCain hates his own party too, and he isn't a lefty.
Logged
jravnsbo
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,888


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #632 on: January 03, 2004, 06:28:41 PM »

First off Mccain does not hate his party.  That is a bit over the top.  Plus he has a great convservative voting record.  He disagrees with them ona  few issues which the press loves to trumpet but not on a great majority of them.

Jeffords has some extreme environmental views for one and that is one of the reasons he switched to get control of that committee, when GOP didn't give it to him he was fuming.  

VT- bernie sanders socialist

Sen Leahy, next best thing to Bernie

Sen Jumping Jim Jeffords, Independant to give Dem power


Civil union laws

Howard Dean

enough said about VT and its lefties
How is Jeffords a lefty?  He is an anti-GOP centrist libertarian.  McCain hates his own party too, and he isn't a lefty.
Logged
ABD
Rookie
**
Posts: 34


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #633 on: January 04, 2004, 03:52:50 AM »

Labour would be unwise to remove Tony Blair.  The UK is essentially a small-c conservative country.  Blair is the face of Labour acceptability and electability.  Remove Blair and Labour will make it that much harder for itself.
Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Er....I've been called far worse than a "rightist" (and although I am a tribal party "true believer", I would definitely describe myself as centre-right in Australian politics, and saw myself as a fairly moderate  Tory in the UK).  "Leftie" ain't exactly a damning term.  And  I seem to recall a few people looking benignly on Mark Latham's fairly bald statements, listed on this site shortly after he became leader.... about how Aussies are outspoken in a way only we can be.... : )
[/quote][/quote][/quote]
Logged
RhodeRage
Rookie
**
Posts: 31


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #634 on: January 04, 2004, 01:43:25 PM »

Wow!  Realpolitic has my total respect as an international observer.  Anyone who can take interest in THAT much politics is good in my books
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #635 on: January 04, 2004, 03:47:23 PM »

Wow!  Realpolitic has my total respect as an international observer.  Anyone who can take interest in THAT much politics is good in my books
And he isn't even 20 years old yet.
Logged
Swing low, sweet chariot. Comin' for to carry me home.
jmfcst
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,212
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #636 on: January 04, 2004, 07:45:18 PM »
« Edited: January 06, 2004, 12:38:55 PM by jmfcst »

Factory New Orders at 54 year high!

The Institute for Supply Management (ISM) said its new orders index jumped to 77.6, the highest level since 80.3 in July 1950, from 73.7 in November.

The ISM index of manufacturing activity jumped to 66.2 from 62.8 in November. Economists, on average, expected an ISM index of 61, the highest since 69.9 in December 1983 and has been above 50, a number that indicates expansion in the sector, for six straight months.

The ISM's employment index rose to 55.5 from 51 in November, marking the second straight month above 50, following 37 months below that mark. That raises the chances that December saw the first gain in manufacturing payrolls since July 2000.

http://money.cnn.com/2004/01/02/news/economy/ism/index.htm
Logged
afleitch
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,860


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #637 on: January 04, 2004, 08:54:44 PM »

Blair may not be universally popular, that is true, but he is far far more popular (and populist) than Michael Howard. Even with a low turn out in 2005/06, Labour are a shoe in. What we do have is a 'Blair Effect'. In the 1980's as Thatcher herself once admitted to a backbencher, people voted for her, rather than for the party, or even for their own MP. This same effect is apparent with Blair, leader for 10 years, Prime Minister for 7, people are comfortable with him, especially when faced with the alternatives.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,722
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #638 on: January 05, 2004, 04:30:28 AM »

A bit scary though Wink
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #639 on: January 05, 2004, 04:22:12 PM »

How old are you?
Logged
Gustaf
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,779


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #640 on: January 05, 2004, 06:09:13 PM »

Wow!  Realpolitic has my total respect as an international observer.  Anyone who can take interest in THAT much politics is good in my books

He even read up on Finnish and Swedish politics recently...

Damn! He will soon know more about that than I do! Sad
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #641 on: January 05, 2004, 08:19:20 PM »

Wow!  Realpolitic has my total respect as an international observer.  Anyone who can take interest in THAT much politics is good in my books

He even read up on Finnish and Swedish politics recently...

Damn! He will soon know more about that than I do! Sad
He knows just as much or more about American politics than most Americans at the forum do.
Logged
Swing low, sweet chariot. Comin' for to carry me home.
jmfcst
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,212
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #642 on: January 05, 2004, 08:58:44 PM »

Construction spending at ALL TIME HIGH for 5th straight month!

Construction spending jumped 1.2 percent to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of $934.5 billion in the month from an upwardly revised $923.8 billion in October, the Commerce Department said. Analysts polled by Reuters were expecting a 0.5 percent increase.

It was the fifth month in a row in which total construction spending hit a new high. Total private construction, total public construction, private residential construction and state and local construction all climbed to fresh records.

http://money.cnn.com/2004/01/05/news/economy/construction.reut/index.htm
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,722
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #643 on: January 06, 2004, 04:19:59 AM »

I'm under 20. No more information will be given Smiley

And I don't think that knowing more about U.S politics than PD is much of an achievment Wink

Logged
English
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,187


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #644 on: January 06, 2004, 10:14:20 AM »

I can't either. But it's a possibility.
Isn't the NDP popular in Nova Scotia?  

I understand the NDP are popular in Halifax NS, but not so elsewhere in Nova Scotia, except perhaps Sydney. Personally I love Nova Scotia, it suffers high unemployment especially in Cape Breton however the people are incredibly friendly. Nova Scotia is one of the few places were the Tories still do fairly well. The NDP's best province is Saskatchewan. Largely due to the socialist voting farmers.
Logged
English
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,187


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #645 on: January 06, 2004, 10:21:35 AM »

I agree, everything points to another Labour win in 2005. Labour are unpopular, but not so unpopular that people would kick them out in favour of the most hated politician of the 1990's! (Howard).
Logged
Peter
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,030


Political Matrix
E: -0.77, S: -7.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #646 on: January 06, 2004, 12:17:28 PM »

Been away for a while, so just catching up:

What I meant by good job with reference to Peter Hain is that (at the time) the EU Constitution looked a rather dangerous prospect for Britain, and therefore Peter Hain would not be viable as he negoitiated it on the UKs behalf.

I see Milburn as the longer term successor to Blair, however, I do wonder whether Labour could elect another Blairite. Brown is still waiting in the shadows, and if anything were to happen to Blair (politically or health), then he would take over. I dont see Estelle Morris as a viable candidate, especially after the A-levels fiasco (I had to live thro' that, didnt really endear me to her). Stephen Twigg is an intereting thought, although I think the country may need twenty more years to be ready for a gay PM (not that is a good thing).

Whoever has been reading the Mail ought to stop buying it, it just encourages the right wing lunatics to print more of their crap.
Logged
English
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,187


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #647 on: January 06, 2004, 12:52:47 PM »

Twigg hardly features at all. I can't imagine him being very popular. Morris and Milburn made a hash of their departments so would be out of the running. Robin Cook looks like a garden knome and Blunkett is too authoritarian. There's only Brown who looks like leader material.
Logged
opebo
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,009


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #648 on: January 06, 2004, 01:55:48 PM »

Speaking of statistics that may effect the election - check out the unemployement rate by state and its change over the year:
http://www.bls.gov/web/laumstch.htm

I think this has a strong effect on certain swing states, though all states may be so improved by November it won't matter.
Logged
Michael Z
Mike
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,288
Political Matrix
E: -5.88, S: -4.72

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #649 on: January 06, 2004, 07:19:38 PM »
« Edited: January 06, 2004, 07:21:06 PM by Michael Zeigermann »

"Leftie" ain't exactly a damning term.

Sorry, I'll admit I am quite sensitive about the term. It just reminds me of when The Sun were at their most slanderous. More of a connotation thing.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 21 22 23 24 25 [26] 27 28 29 30 31 ... 59  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.067 seconds with 13 queries.