NC-PPP: Hagan leads all by at least 5
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 02:06:24 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2014 Gubernatorial Election Polls
  2014 Senatorial Election Polls
  NC-PPP: Hagan leads all by at least 5
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: NC-PPP: Hagan leads all by at least 5  (Read 1284 times)
Obamanation
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 411
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: February 12, 2013, 03:48:19 PM »
« edited: February 12, 2013, 03:57:22 PM by Obamanation »

Approve..............39%
Disapprove..........38%



Hagan....................45%
Patrick McHenry......40%

Hagan...................49%
Phil Berger.............38%

Hagan....................46%
Cherie Berry...........38%

Hagan....................48%
Greg Brannon..........35%

Hagan....................47%
Renee Elmers.........38%

Hagan....................48%
Terry Embler...........33%

Hagan....................48%
Virginia Foxx...........38%

Hagan.....................46%
George Holding........36%

Hagan....................46%
Thom Tillis...............38%


GOP Primary

Phil Berger..............7%
Cherie Berry...........18%
Greg Brannon.........5%
Renee Elmers.........10%
Terry Embler............1%
Virginia Foxx............16%
George Holding........3%
Patrick McHenry.......10%
Thom Tillis................3%

Undecided...............27%

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/2011/PPP_Release_NC_021213.pdf
Logged
Maxwell
mah519
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,459
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: February 12, 2013, 04:48:57 PM »

This should not be overly satisfying numbers. McHenry could make this very competitive should he run. Plus it seems her margins keep decreasing, though those margin decreases are within the margin of error, but still.
Logged
DrScholl
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,137
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -3.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: February 12, 2013, 05:56:15 PM »

These are the same type of numbers Burr had in 2009, but still he won re-election.
Logged
tmthforu94
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,402
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.26, S: -4.52

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: February 12, 2013, 07:10:25 PM »

These are the same type of numbers Burr had in 2009, but still he won re-election.
That increase was largely due to a more favorable environment. That's the thing - it's hard to tell how these races will turn out because we don't know what the environment will be.

If the environment is even close to what 2010 was, I don't see Hagan making it through. These numbers aren't solid enough to get her through what could be a tough midterm.
Logged
Maxwell
mah519
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,459
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: February 12, 2013, 07:28:28 PM »

If the environment is even close to what 2010 was, I don't see Hagan making it through.

I don't think it will be, unfortunately. Nevertheless, I think she barely hangs on to her seat, should someone not named Virginia Foxx be nominated.
Logged
tmthforu94
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,402
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.26, S: -4.52

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: February 12, 2013, 07:42:33 PM »

If the environment is even close to what 2010 was, I don't see Hagan making it through.

I don't think it will be, unfortunately. Nevertheless, I think she barely hangs on to her seat, should someone not named Virginia Foxx be nominated.
Wait, why does everyone think Foxx may run? I keep seeing her name brought up, has she indicated she will? She'll be over 70 on Election Day.
Logged
Miles
MilesC56
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,325
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: February 12, 2013, 07:52:13 PM »

If the environment is even close to what 2010 was, I don't see Hagan making it through.

I don't think it will be, unfortunately. Nevertheless, I think she barely hangs on to her seat, should someone not named Virginia Foxx be nominated.
Wait, why does everyone think Foxx may run? I keep seeing her name brought up, has she indicated she will? She'll be over 70 on Election Day.

Its just her relatively high name rec. I think the Foxx stuff is just hot air.
Logged
Miles
MilesC56
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,325
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: February 12, 2013, 08:03:02 PM »

These are the same type of numbers Burr had in 2009, but still he won re-election.
If the environment is even close to what 2010 was, I don't see Hagan making it through. These numbers aren't solid enough to get her through what could be a tough midterm.

Well, don't forget that the DSCC pretty much punted on NC in 2010. Hagan benefit from being the incumbent and having massive personal $$$.
Logged
Holmes
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,754
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -5.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: February 12, 2013, 08:37:12 PM »

Team Hagan. She'll pull through easily.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.246 seconds with 15 queries.