2019 Japan Unified Local Elections(April) and Upper House elections (July 21st)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 23, 2024, 04:05:15 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  International Elections (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  2019 Japan Unified Local Elections(April) and Upper House elections (July 21st)
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 22 23 24 25 26 [27]
Author Topic: 2019 Japan Unified Local Elections(April) and Upper House elections (July 21st)  (Read 48206 times)
jaichind
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,484
United States


Political Matrix
E: 9.03, S: -5.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #650 on: December 18, 2019, 06:37:30 PM »

I can understand why DPP wouldn’t want to merge, but why are SDP and CDP still individual parties?

SDP base these days are in the South and fairly rural.  So SDP-CDP might not be that different in terms of ideology the SDP view that CDP is too urban bases would be a problem plus SDP being the successor party of SPJ gives it a historical legacy that it might not want to throw away.

Anyway these merger talks

https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?action=post;quote=7096005;topic=298240.650;num_replies=651;sesc=ab9e995c3a96f7e2d1998839d333afd6

always tend to take place toward the end of he year.  The reason is after New Years the government subsidies for political parties are doled out based on the number of MPs a party has on Jan 1st.  So the thinking is "if we all merge we can get a very large bloc of money !!!" followed by "wait, we actually do not agree on policy and even if we do not merge we will still get the same amount of money but just spread out over several parties"   Of course there is an argument of economy of scale argument that organizational cost overhead of a party is such so that if all like minded parties unite the combined money can be spent more efficiently.
Logged
jaichind
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,484
United States


Political Matrix
E: 9.03, S: -5.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #651 on: December 18, 2019, 06:46:35 PM »

https://asia.nikkei.com/Politics/Japan-s-progressive-upstart-rattles-political-establishment

"Japan's progressive upstart rattles political establishment"

There is talk of RS leader 山本太郎(Yamamoto Tarō) running for Tokyo governor next year.  The article I think overestimates  his chances even if the the opposition-JCP consolidates behind him.  The reason is the LDP tends to back the Center or Center-Right incumbent in governor/mayor elections even if the LDP ran against said incumbent in the previous elections.  LDP-KP are most likely to back Koike and with de facto JRP support Koike should defeat 山本太郎(Yamamoto Tarō) with ease even if it became a 1-to-1 battle.  Koike would have lost some of the novelty factor since 2016 but if LDP-KP and JRP back her she should win.
Logged
Former President tack50
tack50
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,891
Spain


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #652 on: December 19, 2019, 05:29:32 AM »

I wonder if the 2020 Olympics will give Abe and/or the LDP a nice approval boost and Abe will call an election for late 2020 or early 2021.

After all the Socialists here benefited quite a bit from the 1992 Olympics, which won them the 1993 elections.
Logged
jaichind
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,484
United States


Political Matrix
E: 9.03, S: -5.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #653 on: December 19, 2019, 05:39:05 AM »

I wonder if the 2020 Olympics will give Abe and/or the LDP a nice approval boost and Abe will call an election for late 2020 or early 2021.

After all the Socialists here benefited quite a bit from the 1992 Olympics, which won them the 1993 elections.

That is exactly the Abe/LDP plan.  That is why most do not buy the latest snap election rumors.
Logged
urutzizu
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 587
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #654 on: December 19, 2019, 10:53:31 AM »

I could actually see the opposite narrative working better, that returning the strong and stable incumbent Government is needed to see the Olympics through. This argument was instrumental in returning Korean pro-military President Roh Tae-woo (노태우) in 1987, ahead of the Seoul Olympics. Given the Cultural Similarities, the Idea that screwing up an Olympics would be perhaps the worst way of collectively losing face, a nightmare in E.Asian cultures, and the Fact that the Japanese Opposition is seen as anything but a safe pair of hands, I could see this working very well. 
Logged
jaichind
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,484
United States


Political Matrix
E: 9.03, S: -5.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #655 on: January 02, 2020, 10:12:58 AM »

KP leader 山口 那津男(Yamaguchi Natsuo) just stated that Abe will likely hold a lower house election after the Olympics. 

I guess, KP, correctly assumes that with time and the aura of a successful Olympics Abe Approval support levels will rise from Dec 2019 levels

Logged
Pages: 1 ... 22 23 24 25 26 [27]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.215 seconds with 12 queries.