Would Clinton really have done that much better than Obama in Appalachia? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 04:48:15 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Trends (Moderator: 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Would Clinton really have done that much better than Obama in Appalachia? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Would Clinton really have done that much better than Obama in Appalachia?  (Read 3565 times)
ReelectCarterMondale!
Rookie
**
Posts: 22


« on: November 23, 2012, 04:47:31 PM »

I ask this because while many of these voters are registered as Democrats, they vote consistently conservatively both in primaries and in the general election. Furthermore, the last few cycles seem to indicate that this region is down more on the national party and what it stands for and that even conservative Democrats have had a difficult time electorally-speaking. These people supported neither Gore nor Kerry, both white men - one a southerner. Would they really have supported Hillary in greater numbers than they supported Barack? And if so, by how much?

I get that Sarah Palin wouldn't have been picked with Clinton as the nominee, would this have given her an opening against "moderate McCain" in the region? Discuss...
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 11 queries.