Would Clinton really have done that much better than Obama in Appalachia? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 09:37:59 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Trends (Moderator: 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Would Clinton really have done that much better than Obama in Appalachia? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Would Clinton really have done that much better than Obama in Appalachia?  (Read 3581 times)
Indy Texas
independentTX
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,269
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.52, S: -3.48

« on: November 26, 2012, 05:43:45 PM »

Is it too much of a bother just to go to your registrar and ask to switch party identification? 

Yes

Not just that but many small towns in the South still have Democratic local officials. If you don't vote in the Democratic primary, you basically have no say over who your mayor, county sheriff, state legislator, etc, is. I read an article shortly after election day saying that even though Republicans won all statewide offices in Alabama (for the first time since Reconstruction) and both chambers of the legislature there, the Democrats still have a majority of district court judgeships. I'd imagine they still have most of the other obscure local offices in rural areas.

Old habits die hard. A 65 year old Yellow Dog Democrat isn't going to start calling himself a Republican, even if his own party's most powerful elected official is a pointy-headed mulatto Yankee with Harvard learnin' who looks down his nose at plain folks like him.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 12 queries.