Would Clinton really have done that much better than Obama in Appalachia? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 07:00:36 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Trends (Moderator: 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Would Clinton really have done that much better than Obama in Appalachia? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Would Clinton really have done that much better than Obama in Appalachia?  (Read 3573 times)
The Mikado
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,774
« on: November 30, 2012, 01:35:40 AM »
Quote from: Oldiesfreak1854 on November 29, 2012, 01:46:05 PM
Yes, but because she was more centrist than Obama.  Obama far and away is just not a good fit for the region politically--he's WAY too liberal.  Not that Hillary Clinton's not pretty far-left herself, but just not as much as Obama.  So, although she probably wouldn't have done a whole lot better, she would have performed better than he did.

Name an issue where Obama and Clinton have substantively different positions.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 13 queries.