Who's the most underperforming House incumbent of them all?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
July 10, 2025, 10:13:09 AM
News: Election Calculator 3.0 with county/house maps is now live. For more info, click here

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Virginiá, KaiserDave)
  Who's the most underperforming House incumbent of them all?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Who's the most underperforming House incumbent of them all?  (Read 1344 times)
Torie
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,493
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: November 09, 2012, 11:42:22 AM »

I have no idea, but Bachmann ran 7 points behind Romney. Is anyone else out there on the Fruited Plain who generated more negative vibes than she did?

Logged
krazen1211
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,372


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: November 09, 2012, 12:24:31 PM »

Jesse Jackson only got 63%.
Logged
Where's the Epstein Client List?
independentTX
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,655
United States



Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: November 09, 2012, 07:46:09 PM »


It's hard to get reelected when you're mentally unstable (whether certifiably so, as with Jackson, or anecdotally so, as with Bachmann.)
Logged
Niemeyerite
JulioMadrid
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,843
Spain


Political Matrix
E: -8.65, S: -9.04

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: November 09, 2012, 09:20:31 PM »

Henry Waxman.
Logged
Chief Justice PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,964
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: November 10, 2012, 09:59:33 PM »


     100% may not be that impressive, but I think he can survive with that kind of margin.
Logged
MaxQue
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,973
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: November 11, 2012, 01:23:56 AM »


     100% may not be that impressive, but I think he can survive with that kind of margin.

He won 54-46 against an independant.
Logged
Small Business Owner of Any Repute
Mr. Moderate
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,431
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: November 11, 2012, 04:01:07 AM »

Baca got slaughtered, but considering I saw about 100 unanswered ads for his opponent (with a far more Latino-friendly name) ...
Logged
Holmes
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,431
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -5.74


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: November 11, 2012, 08:11:28 AM »


It's hard to get reelected when you're mentally unstable (whether certifiably so, as with Jackson, or anecdotally so, as with Bachmann.)

It's not hard to get reelected in that district for a black Democrat.
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,849


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: November 11, 2012, 10:10:52 AM »

I'd look at Tierney and Cicilline, too.
Logged
adma
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,686
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: November 11, 2012, 11:47:36 AM »


Relative to earlier elections.  But relative to earlier *predictions*, they actually *over*performed (Tierney esp.)
Logged
nclib
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,416
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: November 11, 2012, 01:09:58 PM »

DesJarlais certainly underperformed Romney, though perhaps overperformed (or at least met) expectations.
Logged
Meeker
meekermariner
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,164


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: November 11, 2012, 05:09:52 PM »

I guess this depends on how we define underperforming. It terms of raw percentage difference, it was probably Colleen Hanabusa in HI-01 - only got 55% when Obama likely got 67-70% or more in the district. That result is probably mostly due to the strength of her opponent, however, and not weakness on her part.

Tulsi Gabbard in neighboring HI-02 got an astounding 81% of the vote.
Logged
nclib
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,416
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: January 01, 2013, 11:01:17 PM »

These incumbents have been confirmed to have run behind Obama/Romney. I'm surprised there are (already) so many, but redistricting decreased the incumbent's share of the district.

DEMS:
Grijalva, AZ-3
Garamendi, CA-3
McNerney, CA-9
Costa, CA-16
DeGette, CO-1
Polis, CO-2
Perlmutter, CO-7
Brown, FL-5
Johnson, GA-4
Hanabusa, HI-1
Rush, IL-1
Jackson, IL-2
Quigley, IL-5
Davis, IL-7
Carson, IN-7
Loebsack, IA-2
Edwards, MD-4
Tierney, MA-6
Conyers, MI-13
McCollum, MN-4
Clay, MO-1
Cicilline, RI-1
Langevin, RI-2
Cohen, TN-9
Moran, VA-8
Connelly, VA-11
Moore, WI-4


GOP:
Gosar, AZ-4
Crawford, AR-1
Bono Mack, CA-36
Webster, FL-10
Buchanan, FL-16
West, FL-18
Rivera, FL-26
Graves, GA-14
Labrador, ID-1
King, IA-4
Bartlett, MD-6
Benishek, MI-1
Bachmann, MN-6
Cravaack, MN-8
Nunnelee, MS-1
Palazzo, MS-4
Long, MO-7
Terry, NE-2
Guinta, NH-1
Ellmers, NC-2
Foxx, NC-5
McHenry, NC-10
Johnson, OH-6
Lankford, OK-5
Noem, SD-AL
Fleischmann, TN-3
DesJarlais, TN-4
Bishop, UT-1
Chaffetz, UT-3
Griffith, VA-9
Lummis, WY-AL
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,233
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: January 02, 2013, 06:37:57 AM »

I guess this depends on how we define underperforming. It terms of raw percentage difference, it was probably Colleen Hanabusa in HI-01 - only got 55% when Obama likely got 67-70% or more in the district. That result is probably mostly due to the strength of her opponent, however, and not weakness on her part.

Tulsi Gabbard in neighboring HI-02 got an astounding 81% of the vote.
Against a homeless man.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.039 seconds with 9 queries.